FGF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Erie Indemnity has a net margin of -65.47% compared to Fundamental Global's net margin of 44.89%. Fundamental Global's return on equity of 40.42% beat Erie Indemnity's return on equity of 32.79%.

Fundamental Global has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Erie Indemnity has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fundamental Global has higher upside potential than Erie Indemnity, analysts believe Fundamental Global is more attractive than Erie Indemnity.

Fundamental Global has a beta of 0.817, which suggesting that the stock is 18.331% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Erie Indemnity has a beta of 0.471, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.925%.

Fundamental Global has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Erie Indemnity offers a yield of 1.28% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.37 per share. Fundamental Global pays -122.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Erie Indemnity pays out 39.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Erie Indemnity's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fundamental Global quarterly revenues are $17.5M, which are smaller than Erie Indemnity quarterly revenues of $338.7M. Fundamental Global's net income of $17.7M is lower than Erie Indemnity's net income of $152M. Notably, Fundamental Global's price-to-earnings ratio is 0.45x while Erie Indemnity's PE ratio is 35.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fundamental Global is 0.51x versus 5.74x for Erie Indemnity. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Root has a net margin of -65.47% compared to Fundamental Global's net margin of 6.77%. Fundamental Global's return on equity of 40.42% beat Root's return on equity of 17.79%.

Fundamental Global has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Root has an analysts' consensus of $105.20 which suggests that it could fall by -17.89%. Given that Root has higher upside potential than Fundamental Global, analysts believe Root is more attractive than Fundamental Global.

Fundamental Global has a beta of 0.817, which suggesting that the stock is 18.331% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Root has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Fundamental Global has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Root offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fundamental Global pays -122.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Root pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fundamental Global quarterly revenues are $17.5M, which are smaller than Root quarterly revenues of $326.7M. Fundamental Global's net income of $17.7M is lower than Root's net income of $22.1M. Notably, Fundamental Global's price-to-earnings ratio is 0.45x while Root's PE ratio is 74.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fundamental Global is 0.51x versus 1.73x for Root. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Skyward Specialty Insurance Group has a net margin of -65.47% compared to Fundamental Global's net margin of 4.73%. Fundamental Global's return on equity of 40.42% beat Skyward Specialty Insurance Group's return on equity of 16.2%.

Fundamental Global has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Skyward Specialty Insurance Group has an analysts' consensus of $56.50 which suggests that it could grow by 4.54%. Given that Skyward Specialty Insurance Group has higher upside potential than Fundamental Global, analysts believe Skyward Specialty Insurance Group is more attractive than Fundamental Global.

Fundamental Global has a beta of 0.817, which suggesting that the stock is 18.331% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Skyward Specialty Insurance Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Fundamental Global has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Skyward Specialty Insurance Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fundamental Global pays -122.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Skyward Specialty Insurance Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fundamental Global quarterly revenues are $17.5M, which are smaller than Skyward Specialty Insurance Group quarterly revenues of $304.5M. Fundamental Global's net income of $17.7M is higher than Skyward Specialty Insurance Group's net income of $14.4M. Notably, Fundamental Global's price-to-earnings ratio is 0.45x while Skyward Specialty Insurance Group's PE ratio is 18.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fundamental Global is 0.51x versus 1.95x for Skyward Specialty Insurance Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Trupanion has a net margin of -65.47% compared to Fundamental Global's net margin of 0.49%. Fundamental Global's return on equity of 40.42% beat Trupanion's return on equity of -3.1%.

Fundamental Global has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Trupanion has an analysts' consensus of $54.75 which suggests that it could grow by 60.18%. Given that Trupanion has higher upside potential than Fundamental Global, analysts believe Trupanion is more attractive than Fundamental Global.

Fundamental Global has a beta of 0.817, which suggesting that the stock is 18.331% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Trupanion has a beta of 1.665, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 66.468%.

Fundamental Global has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Trupanion offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fundamental Global pays -122.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Trupanion pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fundamental Global quarterly revenues are $17.5M, which are smaller than Trupanion quarterly revenues of $337.3M. Fundamental Global's net income of $17.7M is higher than Trupanion's net income of $1.7M. Notably, Fundamental Global's price-to-earnings ratio is 0.45x while Trupanion's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fundamental Global is 0.51x versus 1.12x for Trupanion. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.