SITM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Broadcom has a net margin of -33.48% compared to SiTime's net margin of 30.77%. SiTime's return on equity of -13.53% beat Broadcom's return on equity of 9.91%.

SiTime has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -6.83%. On the other hand Broadcom has an analysts' consensus of $237.19 which suggests that it could fall by -1.65%. Given that SiTime has more downside risk than Broadcom, analysts believe Broadcom is more attractive than SiTime.

SiTime has a beta of 1.861, which suggesting that the stock is 86.107% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Broadcom has a beta of 1.127, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.725%.

SiTime has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Broadcom offers a yield of 0.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.59 per share. SiTime pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Broadcom pays out 166.48% of its earnings as a dividend.

SiTime quarterly revenues are $57.7M, which are smaller than Broadcom quarterly revenues of $14.1B. SiTime's net income of -$19.3M is lower than Broadcom's net income of $4.3B. Notably, SiTime's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Broadcom's PE ratio is 195.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SiTime is 29.38x versus 22.03x for Broadcom. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

inTest has a net margin of -33.48% compared to SiTime's net margin of 1.64%. SiTime's return on equity of -13.53% beat inTest's return on equity of 2.9%.

SiTime has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -6.83%. On the other hand inTest has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 40.42%. Given that inTest has higher upside potential than SiTime, analysts believe inTest is more attractive than SiTime.

SiTime has a beta of 1.861, which suggesting that the stock is 86.107% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison inTest has a beta of 1.887, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.712%.

SiTime has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. inTest offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SiTime pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. inTest pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

SiTime quarterly revenues are $57.7M, which are larger than inTest quarterly revenues of $30.3M. SiTime's net income of -$19.3M is lower than inTest's net income of $495K. Notably, SiTime's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while inTest's PE ratio is 37.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SiTime is 29.38x versus 0.82x for inTest. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MaxLinear has a net margin of -33.48% compared to SiTime's net margin of -93.44%. SiTime's return on equity of -13.53% beat MaxLinear's return on equity of -35.28%.

SiTime has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -6.83%. On the other hand MaxLinear has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -0.94%. Given that SiTime has more downside risk than MaxLinear, analysts believe MaxLinear is more attractive than SiTime.

SiTime has a beta of 1.861, which suggesting that the stock is 86.107% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MaxLinear has a beta of 1.874, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 87.352%.

SiTime has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MaxLinear offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SiTime pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MaxLinear pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

SiTime quarterly revenues are $57.7M, which are smaller than MaxLinear quarterly revenues of $81.1M. SiTime's net income of -$19.3M is higher than MaxLinear's net income of -$75.8M. Notably, SiTime's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while MaxLinear's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SiTime is 29.38x versus 4.27x for MaxLinear. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NVIDIA has a net margin of -33.48% compared to SiTime's net margin of 55.04%. SiTime's return on equity of -13.53% beat NVIDIA's return on equity of 126.43%.

SiTime has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -6.83%. On the other hand NVIDIA has an analysts' consensus of $172.80 which suggests that it could grow by 23.24%. Given that NVIDIA has higher upside potential than SiTime, analysts believe NVIDIA is more attractive than SiTime.

SiTime has a beta of 1.861, which suggesting that the stock is 86.107% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NVIDIA has a beta of 1.635, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.477%.

SiTime has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NVIDIA offers a yield of 0.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. SiTime pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA pays out 1.33% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SiTime quarterly revenues are $57.7M, which are smaller than NVIDIA quarterly revenues of $35.1B. SiTime's net income of -$19.3M is lower than NVIDIA's net income of $19.3B. Notably, SiTime's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NVIDIA's PE ratio is 55.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SiTime is 29.38x versus 30.78x for NVIDIA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.