SDST Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Advanced Energy Industries has a net margin of -- compared to Stardust Power's net margin of 11.77%. Stardust Power's return on equity of -- beat Advanced Energy Industries's return on equity of 4.66%.

Stardust Power has a consensus price target of $2.89, signalling upside risk potential of 359.46%. On the other hand Advanced Energy Industries has an analysts' consensus of $125.70 which suggests that it could grow by 46.9%. Given that Stardust Power has higher upside potential than Advanced Energy Industries, analysts believe Stardust Power is more attractive than Advanced Energy Industries.

Stardust Power has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Advanced Energy Industries has a beta of 1.472, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.193%.

Stardust Power has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Advanced Energy Industries offers a yield of 0.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Stardust Power pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Advanced Energy Industries pays out 28.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Advanced Energy Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Stardust Power quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Advanced Energy Industries quarterly revenues of $415.4M. Stardust Power's net income of -$10.1M is lower than Advanced Energy Industries's net income of $48.9M. Notably, Stardust Power's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Advanced Energy Industries's PE ratio is 59.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Stardust Power is -- versus 2.18x for Advanced Energy Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ideal Power has a net margin of -- compared to Stardust Power's net margin of -47998.78%. Stardust Power's return on equity of -- beat Ideal Power's return on equity of -57.04%.

Stardust Power has a consensus price target of $2.89, signalling upside risk potential of 359.46%. On the other hand Ideal Power has an analysts' consensus of $4.20 which suggests that it could fall by -16.34%. Given that Stardust Power has higher upside potential than Ideal Power, analysts believe Stardust Power is more attractive than Ideal Power.

Stardust Power has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ideal Power has a beta of 1.052, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.241%.

Stardust Power has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ideal Power offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Stardust Power pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ideal Power pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Stardust Power quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Ideal Power quarterly revenues of $5.4K. Stardust Power's net income of -$10.1M is lower than Ideal Power's net income of -$2.6M. Notably, Stardust Power's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ideal Power's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Stardust Power is -- versus 480.97x for Ideal Power. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Plug Power has a net margin of -- compared to Stardust Power's net margin of -697.46%. Stardust Power's return on equity of -- beat Plug Power's return on equity of -77.08%.

Stardust Power has a consensus price target of $2.89, signalling upside risk potential of 359.46%. On the other hand Plug Power has an analysts' consensus of $2.18 which suggests that it could grow by 137.12%. Given that Stardust Power has higher upside potential than Plug Power, analysts believe Stardust Power is more attractive than Plug Power.

Stardust Power has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Plug Power has a beta of 2.070, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 107.009%.

Stardust Power has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Plug Power offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Stardust Power pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Plug Power pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Stardust Power quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Plug Power quarterly revenues of $191.5M. Stardust Power's net income of -$10.1M is higher than Plug Power's net income of -$1.3B. Notably, Stardust Power's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Plug Power's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Stardust Power is -- versus 1.15x for Plug Power. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ultralife has a net margin of -- compared to Stardust Power's net margin of 0.72%. Stardust Power's return on equity of -- beat Ultralife's return on equity of 6.98%.

Stardust Power has a consensus price target of $2.89, signalling upside risk potential of 359.46%. On the other hand Ultralife has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 231.75%. Given that Stardust Power has higher upside potential than Ultralife, analysts believe Stardust Power is more attractive than Ultralife.

Stardust Power has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ultralife has a beta of 0.959, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.121%.

Stardust Power has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ultralife offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Stardust Power pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ultralife pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Stardust Power quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Ultralife quarterly revenues of $35.7M. Stardust Power's net income of -$10.1M is lower than Ultralife's net income of $258K. Notably, Stardust Power's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ultralife's PE ratio is 10.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Stardust Power is -- versus 0.43x for Ultralife. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.