POCI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Daxor has a net margin of -21.42% compared to Precision Optics's net margin of --. Precision Optics's return on equity of -38.36% beat Daxor's return on equity of 1.57%.

Precision Optics has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Daxor has an analysts' consensus of $23.50 which suggests that it could grow by 192.03%. Given that Daxor has higher upside potential than Precision Optics, analysts believe Daxor is more attractive than Precision Optics.

Precision Optics has a beta of 0.188, which suggesting that the stock is 81.244% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Daxor has a beta of -0.059, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 105.928%.

Precision Optics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Daxor offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Precision Optics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Daxor pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Precision Optics quarterly revenues are $4.5M, which are larger than Daxor quarterly revenues of --. Precision Optics's net income of -$969.7K is higher than Daxor's net income of --. Notably, Precision Optics's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Daxor's PE ratio is 25.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Precision Optics is 1.30x versus 18.44x for Daxor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Milestone Scientific has a net margin of -21.42% compared to Precision Optics's net margin of -58.13%. Precision Optics's return on equity of -38.36% beat Milestone Scientific's return on equity of -61.33%.

Precision Optics has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Milestone Scientific has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 136.11%. Given that Milestone Scientific has higher upside potential than Precision Optics, analysts believe Milestone Scientific is more attractive than Precision Optics.

Precision Optics has a beta of 0.188, which suggesting that the stock is 81.244% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Milestone Scientific has a beta of 1.124, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.429%.

Precision Optics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Milestone Scientific offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Precision Optics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Milestone Scientific pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Precision Optics quarterly revenues are $4.5M, which are larger than Milestone Scientific quarterly revenues of $2.5M. Precision Optics's net income of -$969.7K is higher than Milestone Scientific's net income of -$1.5M. Notably, Precision Optics's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Milestone Scientific's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Precision Optics is 1.30x versus 7.95x for Milestone Scientific. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sanara MedTech has a net margin of -21.42% compared to Precision Optics's net margin of -5.85%. Precision Optics's return on equity of -38.36% beat Sanara MedTech's return on equity of -23.3%.

Precision Optics has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sanara MedTech has an analysts' consensus of $48.50 which suggests that it could grow by 66.95%. Given that Sanara MedTech has higher upside potential than Precision Optics, analysts believe Sanara MedTech is more attractive than Precision Optics.

Precision Optics has a beta of 0.188, which suggesting that the stock is 81.244% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sanara MedTech has a beta of 1.470, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.998%.

Precision Optics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sanara MedTech offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Precision Optics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sanara MedTech pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Precision Optics quarterly revenues are $4.5M, which are smaller than Sanara MedTech quarterly revenues of $26.3M. Precision Optics's net income of -$969.7K is higher than Sanara MedTech's net income of -$1.5M. Notably, Precision Optics's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sanara MedTech's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Precision Optics is 1.30x versus 2.84x for Sanara MedTech. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Warby Parker has a net margin of -21.42% compared to Precision Optics's net margin of -3.61%. Precision Optics's return on equity of -38.36% beat Warby Parker's return on equity of -6.28%.

Precision Optics has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Warby Parker has an analysts' consensus of $26.86 which suggests that it could grow by 81.47%. Given that Warby Parker has higher upside potential than Precision Optics, analysts believe Warby Parker is more attractive than Precision Optics.

Precision Optics has a beta of 0.188, which suggesting that the stock is 81.244% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Warby Parker has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Precision Optics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Warby Parker offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Precision Optics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Warby Parker pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Precision Optics quarterly revenues are $4.5M, which are smaller than Warby Parker quarterly revenues of $190.6M. Precision Optics's net income of -$969.7K is higher than Warby Parker's net income of -$6.9M. Notably, Precision Optics's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Warby Parker's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Precision Optics is 1.30x versus 2.31x for Warby Parker. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.