NYAX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Magic Software Enterprises has a net margin of 0.83% compared to Nayax's net margin of 5.9%. Nayax's return on equity of -7.81% beat Magic Software Enterprises's return on equity of 11.96%.

Nayax has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 19.83%. On the other hand Magic Software Enterprises has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 26.8%. Given that Magic Software Enterprises has higher upside potential than Nayax, analysts believe Magic Software Enterprises is more attractive than Nayax.

Nayax has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Magic Software Enterprises has a beta of 1.093, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.312%.

Nayax has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Magic Software Enterprises offers a yield of 3.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Nayax pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Magic Software Enterprises pays out 83.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Magic Software Enterprises's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Nayax quarterly revenues are $83M, which are smaller than Magic Software Enterprises quarterly revenues of $143M. Nayax's net income of $692K is lower than Magic Software Enterprises's net income of $8.4M. Notably, Nayax's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Magic Software Enterprises's PE ratio is 16.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nayax is 3.36x versus 1.09x for Magic Software Enterprises. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MIND C.T.I. has a net margin of 0.83% compared to Nayax's net margin of 17.84%. Nayax's return on equity of -7.81% beat MIND C.T.I.'s return on equity of 21.23%.

Nayax has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 19.83%. On the other hand MIND C.T.I. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Nayax has higher upside potential than MIND C.T.I., analysts believe Nayax is more attractive than MIND C.T.I..

Nayax has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MIND C.T.I. has a beta of 0.779, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.092%.

Nayax has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MIND C.T.I. offers a yield of 12.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Nayax pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MIND C.T.I. pays out 93.65% of its earnings as a dividend. MIND C.T.I.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Nayax quarterly revenues are $83M, which are larger than MIND C.T.I. quarterly revenues of $5.2M. Nayax's net income of $692K is lower than MIND C.T.I.'s net income of $929K. Notably, Nayax's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while MIND C.T.I.'s PE ratio is 9.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nayax is 3.36x versus 1.87x for MIND C.T.I.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SatixFy Communications has a net margin of 0.83% compared to Nayax's net margin of -539.62%. Nayax's return on equity of -7.81% beat SatixFy Communications's return on equity of --.

Nayax has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 19.83%. On the other hand SatixFy Communications has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 88.57%. Given that SatixFy Communications has higher upside potential than Nayax, analysts believe SatixFy Communications is more attractive than Nayax.

Nayax has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SatixFy Communications has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Nayax has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SatixFy Communications offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nayax pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SatixFy Communications pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Nayax quarterly revenues are $83M, which are larger than SatixFy Communications quarterly revenues of $2.5M. Nayax's net income of $692K is higher than SatixFy Communications's net income of -$13.3M. Notably, Nayax's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SatixFy Communications's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nayax is 3.36x versus 9.63x for SatixFy Communications. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Silynxcom has a net margin of 0.83% compared to Nayax's net margin of --. Nayax's return on equity of -7.81% beat Silynxcom's return on equity of --.

Nayax has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 19.83%. On the other hand Silynxcom has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 137.21%. Given that Silynxcom has higher upside potential than Nayax, analysts believe Silynxcom is more attractive than Nayax.

Nayax has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Silynxcom has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Nayax has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Silynxcom offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nayax pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Silynxcom pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Nayax quarterly revenues are $83M, which are larger than Silynxcom quarterly revenues of --. Nayax's net income of $692K is higher than Silynxcom's net income of --. Notably, Nayax's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Silynxcom's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nayax is 3.36x versus -- for Silynxcom. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.