Is AMD Stock an All-Time Buy?
Advanced Micro Devices (NASDAQ:AMD) is a high-growth AI stock that…
Sell
49
MGIC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$11.67
Seasonality move
:
7.35%
Day range:
$11.78 - $11.91
52-week range:
$9.38 - $13.40
Dividend yield:
3.72%
P/E ratio:
16.90x
P/S ratio:
1.09x
P/B ratio:
2.08x
Volume:
22.3K
Avg. volume:
58.5K
1-year change:
13.97%
Market cap:
$580.8M
Revenue:
$535.1M
EPS (TTM):
$0.70
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MGIC
Magic Software Enterprises
|
$137.3M | $0.25 | 9.12% | 43.82% | -- |
|
FORTY
Formula Systems (1985)
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MNDO
MIND C.T.I.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NYAX
Nayax
|
$87.9M | $0.04 | 37.99% | -79.65% | -- |
|
SATX
SatixFy Communications
|
$5M | -$0.12 | 463.99% | -29.41% | -- |
|
SYNX
Silynxcom
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MGIC
Magic Software Enterprises
|
$11.83 | -- | $580.8M | 16.90x | $0.24 | 3.72% | 1.09x |
|
FORTY
Formula Systems (1985)
|
$93.35 | -- | $1.4B | 19.37x | $0.63 | 1.33% | 0.54x |
|
MNDO
MIND C.T.I.
|
$1.99 | -- | $40.3M | 9.02x | $0.24 | 12.09% | 1.87x |
|
NYAX
Nayax
|
$28.08 | -- | $1B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 3.36x |
|
SATX
SatixFy Communications
|
$1.19 | -- | $101.2M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 9.63x |
|
SYNX
Silynxcom
|
$3.37 | -- | $17.1M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MGIC
Magic Software Enterprises
|
19.05% | 0.351 | 10.86% | 1.76x |
|
FORTY
Formula Systems (1985)
|
43.74% | 1.066 | 26.62% | 1.29x |
|
MNDO
MIND C.T.I.
|
-- | 0.050 | -- | 4.50x |
|
NYAX
Nayax
|
23.02% | -0.509 | 5.34% | 0.86x |
|
SATX
SatixFy Communications
|
-305.75% | 2.641 | 115.09% | 0.28x |
|
SYNX
Silynxcom
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MGIC
Magic Software Enterprises
|
$39.7M | $15.1M | 9.5% | 11.96% | 10.54% | $6.6M |
|
FORTY
Formula Systems (1985)
|
$172.9M | $71M | 4.12% | 5.77% | 10.15% | -- |
|
MNDO
MIND C.T.I.
|
$2.3M | $743K | 21.23% | 21.23% | 14.27% | $947K |
|
NYAX
Nayax
|
$38M | $1.8M | -5.43% | -7.81% | 1.75% | $10.1M |
|
SATX
SatixFy Communications
|
$1.7M | -$9.4M | -- | -- | -382.33% | -- |
|
SYNX
Silynxcom
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Magic Software Enterprises vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns MGIC or FORTY?
Formula Systems (1985) has a net margin of 5.9% compared to Magic Software Enterprises's net margin of 3.37%. Magic Software Enterprises's return on equity of 11.96% beat Formula Systems (1985)'s return on equity of 5.77%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MGICMagic Software Enterprises27.76% $0.17 $370.3M FORTYFormula Systems (1985)24.7% $1.51 $1.9B -
What do Analysts Say About MGIC or FORTY?
Magic Software Enterprises has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 26.8%. On the other hand Formula Systems (1985) has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Magic Software Enterprises has higher upside potential than Formula Systems (1985), analysts believe Magic Software Enterprises is more attractive than Formula Systems (1985).
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MGICMagic Software Enterprises0 0 0 FORTYFormula Systems (1985)0 0 0 -
Is MGIC or FORTY More Risky?
Magic Software Enterprises has a beta of 1.093, which suggesting that the stock is 9.312% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Formula Systems (1985) has a beta of 1.080, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.002%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MGIC or FORTY?
Magic Software Enterprises has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.72%. Formula Systems (1985) offers a yield of 1.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share. Magic Software Enterprises pays 83.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Formula Systems (1985) pays out 15.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MGIC or FORTY?
Magic Software Enterprises quarterly revenues are $143M, which are smaller than Formula Systems (1985) quarterly revenues of $699.9M. Magic Software Enterprises's net income of $8.4M is lower than Formula Systems (1985)'s net income of $23.6M. Notably, Magic Software Enterprises's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.90x while Formula Systems (1985)'s PE ratio is 19.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Magic Software Enterprises is 1.09x versus 0.54x for Formula Systems (1985). Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MGICMagic Software Enterprises1.09x 16.90x $143M $8.4M FORTYFormula Systems (1985)0.54x 19.37x $699.9M $23.6M
-
Which has Higher Returns MGIC or MNDO?
MIND C.T.I. has a net margin of 5.9% compared to Magic Software Enterprises's net margin of 17.84%. Magic Software Enterprises's return on equity of 11.96% beat MIND C.T.I.'s return on equity of 21.23%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MGICMagic Software Enterprises27.76% $0.17 $370.3M MNDOMIND C.T.I.43.32% $0.04 $23.2M -
What do Analysts Say About MGIC or MNDO?
Magic Software Enterprises has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 26.8%. On the other hand MIND C.T.I. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Magic Software Enterprises has higher upside potential than MIND C.T.I., analysts believe Magic Software Enterprises is more attractive than MIND C.T.I..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MGICMagic Software Enterprises0 0 0 MNDOMIND C.T.I.0 0 0 -
Is MGIC or MNDO More Risky?
Magic Software Enterprises has a beta of 1.093, which suggesting that the stock is 9.312% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MIND C.T.I. has a beta of 0.779, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.092%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MGIC or MNDO?
Magic Software Enterprises has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.72%. MIND C.T.I. offers a yield of 12.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Magic Software Enterprises pays 83.17% of its earnings as a dividend. MIND C.T.I. pays out 93.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MGIC or MNDO?
Magic Software Enterprises quarterly revenues are $143M, which are larger than MIND C.T.I. quarterly revenues of $5.2M. Magic Software Enterprises's net income of $8.4M is higher than MIND C.T.I.'s net income of $929K. Notably, Magic Software Enterprises's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.90x while MIND C.T.I.'s PE ratio is 9.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Magic Software Enterprises is 1.09x versus 1.87x for MIND C.T.I.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MGICMagic Software Enterprises1.09x 16.90x $143M $8.4M MNDOMIND C.T.I.1.87x 9.02x $5.2M $929K
-
Which has Higher Returns MGIC or NYAX?
Nayax has a net margin of 5.9% compared to Magic Software Enterprises's net margin of 0.83%. Magic Software Enterprises's return on equity of 11.96% beat Nayax's return on equity of -7.81%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MGICMagic Software Enterprises27.76% $0.17 $370.3M NYAXNayax45.75% $0.02 $212.1M -
What do Analysts Say About MGIC or NYAX?
Magic Software Enterprises has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 26.8%. On the other hand Nayax has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 19.83%. Given that Magic Software Enterprises has higher upside potential than Nayax, analysts believe Magic Software Enterprises is more attractive than Nayax.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MGICMagic Software Enterprises0 0 0 NYAXNayax0 0 0 -
Is MGIC or NYAX More Risky?
Magic Software Enterprises has a beta of 1.093, which suggesting that the stock is 9.312% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nayax has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MGIC or NYAX?
Magic Software Enterprises has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.72%. Nayax offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Magic Software Enterprises pays 83.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Nayax pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Magic Software Enterprises's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MGIC or NYAX?
Magic Software Enterprises quarterly revenues are $143M, which are larger than Nayax quarterly revenues of $83M. Magic Software Enterprises's net income of $8.4M is higher than Nayax's net income of $692K. Notably, Magic Software Enterprises's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.90x while Nayax's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Magic Software Enterprises is 1.09x versus 3.36x for Nayax. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MGICMagic Software Enterprises1.09x 16.90x $143M $8.4M NYAXNayax3.36x -- $83M $692K
-
Which has Higher Returns MGIC or SATX?
SatixFy Communications has a net margin of 5.9% compared to Magic Software Enterprises's net margin of -539.62%. Magic Software Enterprises's return on equity of 11.96% beat SatixFy Communications's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MGICMagic Software Enterprises27.76% $0.17 $370.3M SATXSatixFy Communications67.59% -$0.16 -$22.6M -
What do Analysts Say About MGIC or SATX?
Magic Software Enterprises has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 26.8%. On the other hand SatixFy Communications has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 88.57%. Given that SatixFy Communications has higher upside potential than Magic Software Enterprises, analysts believe SatixFy Communications is more attractive than Magic Software Enterprises.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MGICMagic Software Enterprises0 0 0 SATXSatixFy Communications0 0 0 -
Is MGIC or SATX More Risky?
Magic Software Enterprises has a beta of 1.093, which suggesting that the stock is 9.312% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SatixFy Communications has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MGIC or SATX?
Magic Software Enterprises has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.72%. SatixFy Communications offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Magic Software Enterprises pays 83.17% of its earnings as a dividend. SatixFy Communications pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Magic Software Enterprises's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MGIC or SATX?
Magic Software Enterprises quarterly revenues are $143M, which are larger than SatixFy Communications quarterly revenues of $2.5M. Magic Software Enterprises's net income of $8.4M is higher than SatixFy Communications's net income of -$13.3M. Notably, Magic Software Enterprises's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.90x while SatixFy Communications's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Magic Software Enterprises is 1.09x versus 9.63x for SatixFy Communications. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MGICMagic Software Enterprises1.09x 16.90x $143M $8.4M SATXSatixFy Communications9.63x -- $2.5M -$13.3M
-
Which has Higher Returns MGIC or SYNX?
Silynxcom has a net margin of 5.9% compared to Magic Software Enterprises's net margin of --. Magic Software Enterprises's return on equity of 11.96% beat Silynxcom's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MGICMagic Software Enterprises27.76% $0.17 $370.3M SYNXSilynxcom-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MGIC or SYNX?
Magic Software Enterprises has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 26.8%. On the other hand Silynxcom has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 137.21%. Given that Silynxcom has higher upside potential than Magic Software Enterprises, analysts believe Silynxcom is more attractive than Magic Software Enterprises.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MGICMagic Software Enterprises0 0 0 SYNXSilynxcom0 0 0 -
Is MGIC or SYNX More Risky?
Magic Software Enterprises has a beta of 1.093, which suggesting that the stock is 9.312% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Silynxcom has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MGIC or SYNX?
Magic Software Enterprises has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.72%. Silynxcom offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Magic Software Enterprises pays 83.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Silynxcom pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Magic Software Enterprises's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MGIC or SYNX?
Magic Software Enterprises quarterly revenues are $143M, which are larger than Silynxcom quarterly revenues of --. Magic Software Enterprises's net income of $8.4M is higher than Silynxcom's net income of --. Notably, Magic Software Enterprises's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.90x while Silynxcom's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Magic Software Enterprises is 1.09x versus -- for Silynxcom. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MGICMagic Software Enterprises1.09x 16.90x $143M $8.4M SYNXSilynxcom-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
How High Will Airbnb Stock Go?
Airbnb, Inc. (NASDAQ:ABNB) share price has seen substantial turbulence over…
Why Is SoundHound AI Stock Up So Much?
Like many companies improving AI technologies and exploring ways to…
Stock Ideas
Buy
65
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 43x
Buy
56
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 117x
Buy
57
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Buy
64
ARQQ alert for Dec 27
Arqit Quantum [ARQQ] is down 6.46% over the past day.
Buy
64
QMCO alert for Dec 27
Quantum [QMCO] is up 3.22% over the past day.
Buy
65
ALGS alert for Dec 27
Aligos Therapeutics [ALGS] is down 3.76% over the past day.
