NNE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

GE Vernova has a net margin of -- compared to Nano Nuclear Energy's net margin of 3.16%. Nano Nuclear Energy's return on equity of -- beat GE Vernova's return on equity of 19.05%.

Nano Nuclear Energy has a consensus price target of $47.50, signalling upside risk potential of 107.24%. On the other hand GE Vernova has an analysts' consensus of $400.28 which suggests that it could grow by 7.48%. Given that Nano Nuclear Energy has higher upside potential than GE Vernova, analysts believe Nano Nuclear Energy is more attractive than GE Vernova.

Nano Nuclear Energy has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GE Vernova has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Nano Nuclear Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. GE Vernova offers a yield of 0.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Nano Nuclear Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. GE Vernova pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Nano Nuclear Energy quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than GE Vernova quarterly revenues of $8B. Nano Nuclear Energy's net income of -$3.1M is lower than GE Vernova's net income of $254M. Notably, Nano Nuclear Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while GE Vernova's PE ratio is 53.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nano Nuclear Energy is -- versus 2.90x for GE Vernova. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NET Power has a net margin of -- compared to Nano Nuclear Energy's net margin of -1793.28%. Nano Nuclear Energy's return on equity of -- beat NET Power's return on equity of 0.34%.

Nano Nuclear Energy has a consensus price target of $47.50, signalling upside risk potential of 107.24%. On the other hand NET Power has an analysts' consensus of $7.80 which suggests that it could grow by 350.87%. Given that NET Power has higher upside potential than Nano Nuclear Energy, analysts believe NET Power is more attractive than Nano Nuclear Energy.

Nano Nuclear Energy has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NET Power has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Nano Nuclear Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NET Power offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nano Nuclear Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NET Power pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Nano Nuclear Energy quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than NET Power quarterly revenues of $12K. Nano Nuclear Energy's net income of -$3.1M is higher than NET Power's net income of -$34.3M. Notably, Nano Nuclear Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NET Power's PE ratio is 36.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nano Nuclear Energy is -- versus -- for NET Power. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ocean Power Technologies has a net margin of -- compared to Nano Nuclear Energy's net margin of -814.55%. Nano Nuclear Energy's return on equity of -- beat Ocean Power Technologies's return on equity of -92.45%.

Nano Nuclear Energy has a consensus price target of $47.50, signalling upside risk potential of 107.24%. On the other hand Ocean Power Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Nano Nuclear Energy has higher upside potential than Ocean Power Technologies, analysts believe Nano Nuclear Energy is more attractive than Ocean Power Technologies.

Nano Nuclear Energy has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ocean Power Technologies has a beta of 2.514, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 151.394%.

Nano Nuclear Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ocean Power Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nano Nuclear Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ocean Power Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Nano Nuclear Energy quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Ocean Power Technologies quarterly revenues of $825K. Nano Nuclear Energy's net income of -$3.1M is higher than Ocean Power Technologies's net income of -$6.7M. Notably, Nano Nuclear Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ocean Power Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nano Nuclear Energy is -- versus 7.02x for Ocean Power Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SIFCO Industries has a net margin of -- compared to Nano Nuclear Energy's net margin of -11.09%. Nano Nuclear Energy's return on equity of -- beat SIFCO Industries's return on equity of -13.54%.

Nano Nuclear Energy has a consensus price target of $47.50, signalling upside risk potential of 107.24%. On the other hand SIFCO Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 380.74%. Given that SIFCO Industries has higher upside potential than Nano Nuclear Energy, analysts believe SIFCO Industries is more attractive than Nano Nuclear Energy.

Nano Nuclear Energy has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SIFCO Industries has a beta of 0.979, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.084%.

Nano Nuclear Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SIFCO Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nano Nuclear Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SIFCO Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Nano Nuclear Energy quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than SIFCO Industries quarterly revenues of $20.9M. Nano Nuclear Energy's net income of -$3.1M is lower than SIFCO Industries's net income of -$2.3M. Notably, Nano Nuclear Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SIFCO Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nano Nuclear Energy is -- versus 0.20x for SIFCO Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.