LPLA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Innventure has a net margin of 7.71% compared to LPL Financial Holdings's net margin of -697.48%. LPL Financial Holdings's return on equity of 42.12% beat Innventure's return on equity of --.

LPL Financial Holdings has a consensus price target of $386.46, signalling upside risk potential of 24.37%. On the other hand Innventure has an analysts' consensus of $14.00 which suggests that it could grow by 283.56%. Given that Innventure has higher upside potential than LPL Financial Holdings, analysts believe Innventure is more attractive than LPL Financial Holdings.

LPL Financial Holdings has a beta of 0.639, which suggesting that the stock is 36.12% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Innventure has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

LPL Financial Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.39%. Innventure offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. LPL Financial Holdings pays 8.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Innventure pays out -0.78% of its earnings as a dividend. LPL Financial Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

LPL Financial Holdings quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are larger than Innventure quarterly revenues of $317K. LPL Financial Holdings's net income of $270.7M is higher than Innventure's net income of -$2.2M. Notably, LPL Financial Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.13x while Innventure's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LPL Financial Holdings is 1.89x versus 159.49x for Innventure. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

OFS Capital has a net margin of 7.71% compared to LPL Financial Holdings's net margin of 95.88%. LPL Financial Holdings's return on equity of 42.12% beat OFS Capital's return on equity of 18.05%.

LPL Financial Holdings has a consensus price target of $386.46, signalling upside risk potential of 24.37%. On the other hand OFS Capital has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 9.22%. Given that LPL Financial Holdings has higher upside potential than OFS Capital, analysts believe LPL Financial Holdings is more attractive than OFS Capital.

LPL Financial Holdings has a beta of 0.639, which suggesting that the stock is 36.12% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison OFS Capital has a beta of 1.294, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.361%.

LPL Financial Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.39%. OFS Capital offers a yield of 16.51% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. LPL Financial Holdings pays 8.48% of its earnings as a dividend. OFS Capital pays out 64.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

LPL Financial Holdings quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are larger than OFS Capital quarterly revenues of $26.6M. LPL Financial Holdings's net income of $270.7M is higher than OFS Capital's net income of $25.5M. Notably, LPL Financial Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.13x while OFS Capital's PE ratio is 3.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LPL Financial Holdings is 1.89x versus 3.36x for OFS Capital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Charles Schwab has a net margin of 7.71% compared to LPL Financial Holdings's net margin of 34.53%. LPL Financial Holdings's return on equity of 42.12% beat Charles Schwab's return on equity of 13.33%.

LPL Financial Holdings has a consensus price target of $386.46, signalling upside risk potential of 24.37%. On the other hand Charles Schwab has an analysts' consensus of $86.40 which suggests that it could grow by 12.39%. Given that LPL Financial Holdings has higher upside potential than Charles Schwab, analysts believe LPL Financial Holdings is more attractive than Charles Schwab.

LPL Financial Holdings has a beta of 0.639, which suggesting that the stock is 36.12% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Charles Schwab has a beta of 0.909, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.098%.

LPL Financial Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.39%. Charles Schwab offers a yield of 1.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. LPL Financial Holdings pays 8.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Charles Schwab pays out 38.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

LPL Financial Holdings quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are smaller than Charles Schwab quarterly revenues of $5.3B. LPL Financial Holdings's net income of $270.7M is lower than Charles Schwab's net income of $1.8B. Notably, LPL Financial Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.13x while Charles Schwab's PE ratio is 25.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LPL Financial Holdings is 1.89x versus 7.20x for Charles Schwab. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Stifel Financial has a net margin of 7.71% compared to LPL Financial Holdings's net margin of 18.1%. LPL Financial Holdings's return on equity of 42.12% beat Stifel Financial's return on equity of 13.44%.

LPL Financial Holdings has a consensus price target of $386.46, signalling upside risk potential of 24.37%. On the other hand Stifel Financial has an analysts' consensus of $105.57 which suggests that it could grow by 25.19%. Given that Stifel Financial has higher upside potential than LPL Financial Holdings, analysts believe Stifel Financial is more attractive than LPL Financial Holdings.

LPL Financial Holdings has a beta of 0.639, which suggesting that the stock is 36.12% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Stifel Financial has a beta of 0.998, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.247%.

LPL Financial Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.39%. Stifel Financial offers a yield of 2.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share. LPL Financial Holdings pays 8.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Stifel Financial pays out 31.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

LPL Financial Holdings quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are larger than Stifel Financial quarterly revenues of $1.3B. LPL Financial Holdings's net income of $270.7M is higher than Stifel Financial's net income of $244M. Notably, LPL Financial Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.13x while Stifel Financial's PE ratio is 13.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LPL Financial Holdings is 1.89x versus 1.91x for Stifel Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.