LMB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CECO Environmental has a net margin of 6.85% compared to Limbach Holdings's net margin of 3.08%. Limbach Holdings's return on equity of 22.87% beat CECO Environmental's return on equity of 5.35%.

Limbach Holdings has a consensus price target of $107.00, signalling upside risk potential of 28.93%. On the other hand CECO Environmental has an analysts' consensus of $35.80 which suggests that it could grow by 47.27%. Given that CECO Environmental has higher upside potential than Limbach Holdings, analysts believe CECO Environmental is more attractive than Limbach Holdings.

Limbach Holdings has a beta of 1.182, which suggesting that the stock is 18.159% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CECO Environmental has a beta of 1.429, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.919%.

Limbach Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CECO Environmental offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Limbach Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CECO Environmental pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Limbach Holdings quarterly revenues are $143.7M, which are smaller than CECO Environmental quarterly revenues of $158.6M. Limbach Holdings's net income of $9.8M is higher than CECO Environmental's net income of $4.9M. Notably, Limbach Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.17x while CECO Environmental's PE ratio is 69.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Limbach Holdings is 1.92x versus 1.59x for CECO Environmental. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Donaldson has a net margin of 6.85% compared to Limbach Holdings's net margin of 11.02%. Limbach Holdings's return on equity of 22.87% beat Donaldson's return on equity of 28.11%.

Limbach Holdings has a consensus price target of $107.00, signalling upside risk potential of 28.93%. On the other hand Donaldson has an analysts' consensus of $73.83 which suggests that it could grow by 9.86%. Given that Limbach Holdings has higher upside potential than Donaldson, analysts believe Limbach Holdings is more attractive than Donaldson.

Limbach Holdings has a beta of 1.182, which suggesting that the stock is 18.159% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Donaldson has a beta of 1.040, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.969%.

Limbach Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Donaldson offers a yield of 1.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. Limbach Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Donaldson pays out 29.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Donaldson's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Limbach Holdings quarterly revenues are $143.7M, which are smaller than Donaldson quarterly revenues of $870M. Limbach Holdings's net income of $9.8M is lower than Donaldson's net income of $95.9M. Notably, Limbach Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.17x while Donaldson's PE ratio is 19.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Limbach Holdings is 1.92x versus 2.26x for Donaldson. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Fuel Tech has a net margin of 6.85% compared to Limbach Holdings's net margin of -35.64%. Limbach Holdings's return on equity of 22.87% beat Fuel Tech's return on equity of -4.48%.

Limbach Holdings has a consensus price target of $107.00, signalling upside risk potential of 28.93%. On the other hand Fuel Tech has an analysts' consensus of $4.00 which suggests that it could grow by 310.59%. Given that Fuel Tech has higher upside potential than Limbach Holdings, analysts believe Fuel Tech is more attractive than Limbach Holdings.

Limbach Holdings has a beta of 1.182, which suggesting that the stock is 18.159% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fuel Tech has a beta of 4.246, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 324.613%.

Limbach Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Fuel Tech offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Limbach Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fuel Tech pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Limbach Holdings quarterly revenues are $143.7M, which are larger than Fuel Tech quarterly revenues of $5.3M. Limbach Holdings's net income of $9.8M is higher than Fuel Tech's net income of -$1.9M. Notably, Limbach Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.17x while Fuel Tech's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Limbach Holdings is 1.92x versus 1.19x for Fuel Tech. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lennox International has a net margin of 6.85% compared to Limbach Holdings's net margin of 14.7%. Limbach Holdings's return on equity of 22.87% beat Lennox International's return on equity of 142.28%.

Limbach Holdings has a consensus price target of $107.00, signalling upside risk potential of 28.93%. On the other hand Lennox International has an analysts' consensus of $613.89 which suggests that it could grow by 7.79%. Given that Limbach Holdings has higher upside potential than Lennox International, analysts believe Limbach Holdings is more attractive than Lennox International.

Limbach Holdings has a beta of 1.182, which suggesting that the stock is 18.159% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lennox International has a beta of 1.133, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.296%.

Limbach Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lennox International offers a yield of 0.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.15 per share. Limbach Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lennox International pays out 19.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Lennox International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Limbach Holdings quarterly revenues are $143.7M, which are smaller than Lennox International quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Limbach Holdings's net income of $9.8M is lower than Lennox International's net income of $197.7M. Notably, Limbach Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.17x while Lennox International's PE ratio is 25.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Limbach Holdings is 1.92x versus 3.82x for Lennox International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.