AAON Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Donaldson has a net margin of 16.08% compared to AAON's net margin of 11%. AAON's return on equity of 25.53% beat Donaldson's return on equity of 29.12%.

AAON has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1.43%. On the other hand Donaldson has an analysts' consensus of $75.83 which suggests that it could grow by 11.49%. Given that Donaldson has higher upside potential than AAON, analysts believe Donaldson is more attractive than AAON.

AAON has a beta of 0.834, which suggesting that the stock is 16.562% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Donaldson has a beta of 1.042, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.206%.

AAON has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.26%. Donaldson offers a yield of 1.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. AAON pays 14.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Donaldson pays out 29.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AAON quarterly revenues are $327.3M, which are smaller than Donaldson quarterly revenues of $900.1M. AAON's net income of $52.6M is lower than Donaldson's net income of $99M. Notably, AAON's price-to-earnings ratio is 54.64x while Donaldson's PE ratio is 19.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AAON is 8.57x versus 2.29x for Donaldson. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Fuel Tech has a net margin of 16.08% compared to AAON's net margin of 1.02%. AAON's return on equity of 25.53% beat Fuel Tech's return on equity of -1.37%.

AAON has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1.43%. On the other hand Fuel Tech has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 284.62%. Given that Fuel Tech has higher upside potential than AAON, analysts believe Fuel Tech is more attractive than AAON.

AAON has a beta of 0.834, which suggesting that the stock is 16.562% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fuel Tech has a beta of 4.099, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 309.928%.

AAON has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.26%. Fuel Tech offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AAON pays 14.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Fuel Tech pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. AAON's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AAON quarterly revenues are $327.3M, which are larger than Fuel Tech quarterly revenues of $7.9M. AAON's net income of $52.6M is higher than Fuel Tech's net income of $80K. Notably, AAON's price-to-earnings ratio is 54.64x while Fuel Tech's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AAON is 8.57x versus 1.22x for Fuel Tech. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lennox International has a net margin of 16.08% compared to AAON's net margin of 15.95%. AAON's return on equity of 25.53% beat Lennox International's return on equity of 175.69%.

AAON has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1.43%. On the other hand Lennox International has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -1.41%. Given that AAON has higher upside potential than Lennox International, analysts believe AAON is more attractive than Lennox International.

AAON has a beta of 0.834, which suggesting that the stock is 16.562% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lennox International has a beta of 1.084, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.373%.

AAON has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.26%. Lennox International offers a yield of 0.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.15 per share. AAON pays 14.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Lennox International pays out 26% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AAON quarterly revenues are $327.3M, which are smaller than Lennox International quarterly revenues of $1.5B. AAON's net income of $52.6M is lower than Lennox International's net income of $239M. Notably, AAON's price-to-earnings ratio is 54.64x while Lennox International's PE ratio is 29.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AAON is 8.57x versus 4.37x for Lennox International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Limbach Holdings has a net margin of 16.08% compared to AAON's net margin of 5.59%. AAON's return on equity of 25.53% beat Limbach Holdings's return on equity of 20.67%.

AAON has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1.43%. On the other hand Limbach Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 18.8%. Given that Limbach Holdings has higher upside potential than AAON, analysts believe Limbach Holdings is more attractive than AAON.

AAON has a beta of 0.834, which suggesting that the stock is 16.562% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Limbach Holdings has a beta of 1.089, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.932%.

AAON has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.26%. Limbach Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AAON pays 14.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Limbach Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. AAON's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AAON quarterly revenues are $327.3M, which are larger than Limbach Holdings quarterly revenues of $133.9M. AAON's net income of $52.6M is higher than Limbach Holdings's net income of $7.5M. Notably, AAON's price-to-earnings ratio is 54.64x while Limbach Holdings's PE ratio is 41.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AAON is 8.57x versus 2.09x for Limbach Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.