KE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hubbell has a net margin of 0.84% compared to Kimball Electronics's net margin of 15.21%. Kimball Electronics's return on equity of 2.39% beat Hubbell's return on equity of 25.27%.

Kimball Electronics has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 30.65%. On the other hand Hubbell has an analysts' consensus of $417.02 which suggests that it could grow by 11.24%. Given that Kimball Electronics has higher upside potential than Hubbell, analysts believe Kimball Electronics is more attractive than Hubbell.

Kimball Electronics has a beta of 1.250, which suggesting that the stock is 25.017% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hubbell has a beta of 0.907, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.274%.

Kimball Electronics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hubbell offers a yield of 1.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.32 per share. Kimball Electronics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hubbell pays out 32.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Hubbell's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kimball Electronics quarterly revenues are $374.3M, which are smaller than Hubbell quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Kimball Electronics's net income of $3.2M is lower than Hubbell's net income of $219.4M. Notably, Kimball Electronics's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.02x while Hubbell's PE ratio is 30.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kimball Electronics is 0.28x versus 4.09x for Hubbell. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Orbit International has a net margin of 0.84% compared to Kimball Electronics's net margin of --. Kimball Electronics's return on equity of 2.39% beat Orbit International's return on equity of --.

Kimball Electronics has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 30.65%. On the other hand Orbit International has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 2.27%. Given that Kimball Electronics has higher upside potential than Orbit International, analysts believe Kimball Electronics is more attractive than Orbit International.

Kimball Electronics has a beta of 1.250, which suggesting that the stock is 25.017% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Orbit International has a beta of 0.494, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.624%.

Kimball Electronics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Orbit International offers a yield of 1.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Kimball Electronics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Orbit International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Kimball Electronics quarterly revenues are $374.3M, which are larger than Orbit International quarterly revenues of --. Kimball Electronics's net income of $3.2M is higher than Orbit International's net income of --. Notably, Kimball Electronics's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.02x while Orbit International's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kimball Electronics is 0.28x versus 0.87x for Orbit International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Powell Industries has a net margin of 0.84% compared to Kimball Electronics's net margin of 16.74%. Kimball Electronics's return on equity of 2.39% beat Powell Industries's return on equity of 37%.

Kimball Electronics has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 30.65%. On the other hand Powell Industries has an analysts' consensus of $128.00 which suggests that it could grow by 0.79%. Given that Kimball Electronics has higher upside potential than Powell Industries, analysts believe Kimball Electronics is more attractive than Powell Industries.

Kimball Electronics has a beta of 1.250, which suggesting that the stock is 25.017% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Powell Industries has a beta of 0.855, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.486%.

Kimball Electronics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Powell Industries offers a yield of 0.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. Kimball Electronics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Powell Industries pays out 8.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Powell Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kimball Electronics quarterly revenues are $374.3M, which are larger than Powell Industries quarterly revenues of $275.1M. Kimball Electronics's net income of $3.2M is lower than Powell Industries's net income of $46.1M. Notably, Kimball Electronics's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.02x while Powell Industries's PE ratio is 20.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kimball Electronics is 0.28x versus 2.96x for Powell Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RF Industries has a net margin of 0.84% compared to Kimball Electronics's net margin of -4.19%. Kimball Electronics's return on equity of 2.39% beat RF Industries's return on equity of -19.23%.

Kimball Electronics has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 30.65%. On the other hand RF Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 23.46%. Given that Kimball Electronics has higher upside potential than RF Industries, analysts believe Kimball Electronics is more attractive than RF Industries.

Kimball Electronics has a beta of 1.250, which suggesting that the stock is 25.017% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RF Industries has a beta of 0.986, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.367%.

Kimball Electronics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. RF Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kimball Electronics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. RF Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Kimball Electronics quarterly revenues are $374.3M, which are larger than RF Industries quarterly revenues of $16.8M. Kimball Electronics's net income of $3.2M is higher than RF Industries's net income of -$705K. Notably, Kimball Electronics's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.02x while RF Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kimball Electronics is 0.28x versus 0.61x for RF Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.