IEP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Clean Energy Fuels has a net margin of -3.91% compared to Icahn Enterprises LP's net margin of -27.59%. Icahn Enterprises LP's return on equity of -8.39% beat Clean Energy Fuels's return on equity of -11.4%.

Icahn Enterprises LP has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 54.8%. On the other hand Clean Energy Fuels has an analysts' consensus of $6.73 which suggests that it could grow by 302.86%. Given that Clean Energy Fuels has higher upside potential than Icahn Enterprises LP, analysts believe Clean Energy Fuels is more attractive than Icahn Enterprises LP.

Icahn Enterprises LP has a beta of 0.846, which suggesting that the stock is 15.379% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Clean Energy Fuels has a beta of 2.347, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 134.669%.

Icahn Enterprises LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 30.96%. Clean Energy Fuels offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Icahn Enterprises LP pays -87.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Clean Energy Fuels pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Icahn Enterprises LP quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than Clean Energy Fuels quarterly revenues of $109.3M. Icahn Enterprises LP's net income of -$98M is lower than Clean Energy Fuels's net income of -$30.2M. Notably, Icahn Enterprises LP's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Clean Energy Fuels's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Icahn Enterprises LP is 0.46x versus 0.90x for Clean Energy Fuels. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CVR Energy has a net margin of -3.91% compared to Icahn Enterprises LP's net margin of 1.49%. Icahn Enterprises LP's return on equity of -8.39% beat CVR Energy's return on equity of 0.82%.

Icahn Enterprises LP has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 54.8%. On the other hand CVR Energy has an analysts' consensus of $19.83 which suggests that it could fall by -6.45%. Given that Icahn Enterprises LP has higher upside potential than CVR Energy, analysts believe Icahn Enterprises LP is more attractive than CVR Energy.

Icahn Enterprises LP has a beta of 0.846, which suggesting that the stock is 15.379% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CVR Energy has a beta of 1.570, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.044%.

Icahn Enterprises LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 30.96%. CVR Energy offers a yield of 9.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Icahn Enterprises LP pays -87.87% of its earnings as a dividend. CVR Energy pays out 2157.14% of its earnings as a dividend.

Icahn Enterprises LP quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than CVR Energy quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Icahn Enterprises LP's net income of -$98M is lower than CVR Energy's net income of $29M. Notably, Icahn Enterprises LP's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CVR Energy's PE ratio is 353.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Icahn Enterprises LP is 0.46x versus 0.28x for CVR Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Geospace Technologies has a net margin of -3.91% compared to Icahn Enterprises LP's net margin of 22.5%. Icahn Enterprises LP's return on equity of -8.39% beat Geospace Technologies's return on equity of -7.74%.

Icahn Enterprises LP has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 54.8%. On the other hand Geospace Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Icahn Enterprises LP has higher upside potential than Geospace Technologies, analysts believe Icahn Enterprises LP is more attractive than Geospace Technologies.

Icahn Enterprises LP has a beta of 0.846, which suggesting that the stock is 15.379% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Geospace Technologies has a beta of 0.568, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.175%.

Icahn Enterprises LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 30.96%. Geospace Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Icahn Enterprises LP pays -87.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Geospace Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Icahn Enterprises LP quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than Geospace Technologies quarterly revenues of $37.2M. Icahn Enterprises LP's net income of -$98M is lower than Geospace Technologies's net income of $8.4M. Notably, Icahn Enterprises LP's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Geospace Technologies's PE ratio is 13.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Icahn Enterprises LP is 0.46x versus 0.79x for Geospace Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Phillips 66 has a net margin of -3.91% compared to Icahn Enterprises LP's net margin of 0.02%. Icahn Enterprises LP's return on equity of -8.39% beat Phillips 66's return on equity of 7%.

Icahn Enterprises LP has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 54.8%. On the other hand Phillips 66 has an analysts' consensus of $139.29 which suggests that it could grow by 10.99%. Given that Icahn Enterprises LP has higher upside potential than Phillips 66, analysts believe Icahn Enterprises LP is more attractive than Phillips 66.

Icahn Enterprises LP has a beta of 0.846, which suggesting that the stock is 15.379% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Phillips 66 has a beta of 1.309, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.884%.

Icahn Enterprises LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 30.96%. Phillips 66 offers a yield of 3.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.15 per share. Icahn Enterprises LP pays -87.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Phillips 66 pays out 88.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Phillips 66's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Icahn Enterprises LP quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are smaller than Phillips 66 quarterly revenues of $33.7B. Icahn Enterprises LP's net income of -$98M is lower than Phillips 66's net income of $8M. Notably, Icahn Enterprises LP's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Phillips 66's PE ratio is 25.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Icahn Enterprises LP is 0.46x versus 0.37x for Phillips 66. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.