GEOS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Drilling Tools International has a net margin of 22.5% compared to Geospace Technologies's net margin of -3.38%. Geospace Technologies's return on equity of -7.74% beat Drilling Tools International's return on equity of 2.92%.

Geospace Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Drilling Tools International has an analysts' consensus of $5.37 which suggests that it could grow by 103.28%. Given that Drilling Tools International has higher upside potential than Geospace Technologies, analysts believe Drilling Tools International is more attractive than Geospace Technologies.

Geospace Technologies has a beta of 0.568, which suggesting that the stock is 43.175% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Drilling Tools International has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Geospace Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Drilling Tools International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Geospace Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Drilling Tools International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Geospace Technologies quarterly revenues are $37.2M, which are smaller than Drilling Tools International quarterly revenues of $39.8M. Geospace Technologies's net income of $8.4M is higher than Drilling Tools International's net income of -$1.3M. Notably, Geospace Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.06x while Drilling Tools International's PE ratio is 24.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Geospace Technologies is 0.79x versus 0.55x for Drilling Tools International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MRC Global has a net margin of 22.5% compared to Geospace Technologies's net margin of -3.99%. Geospace Technologies's return on equity of -7.74% beat MRC Global's return on equity of 6.88%.

Geospace Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand MRC Global has an analysts' consensus of $16.25 which suggests that it could grow by 36.44%. Given that MRC Global has higher upside potential than Geospace Technologies, analysts believe MRC Global is more attractive than Geospace Technologies.

Geospace Technologies has a beta of 0.568, which suggesting that the stock is 43.175% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MRC Global has a beta of 1.959, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 95.949%.

Geospace Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MRC Global offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Geospace Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MRC Global pays out 41.82% of its earnings as a dividend. MRC Global's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Geospace Technologies quarterly revenues are $37.2M, which are smaller than MRC Global quarterly revenues of $576M. Geospace Technologies's net income of $8.4M is higher than MRC Global's net income of -$23M. Notably, Geospace Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.06x while MRC Global's PE ratio is 39.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Geospace Technologies is 0.79x versus 0.34x for MRC Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Natural Gas Services Group has a net margin of 22.5% compared to Geospace Technologies's net margin of 7.05%. Geospace Technologies's return on equity of -7.74% beat Natural Gas Services Group's return on equity of 7.01%.

Geospace Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Natural Gas Services Group has an analysts' consensus of $36.00 which suggests that it could grow by 66.28%. Given that Natural Gas Services Group has higher upside potential than Geospace Technologies, analysts believe Natural Gas Services Group is more attractive than Geospace Technologies.

Geospace Technologies has a beta of 0.568, which suggesting that the stock is 43.175% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Natural Gas Services Group has a beta of 1.134, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.403%.

Geospace Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Natural Gas Services Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Geospace Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Natural Gas Services Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Geospace Technologies quarterly revenues are $37.2M, which are smaller than Natural Gas Services Group quarterly revenues of $40.7M. Geospace Technologies's net income of $8.4M is higher than Natural Gas Services Group's net income of $2.9M. Notably, Geospace Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.06x while Natural Gas Services Group's PE ratio is 15.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Geospace Technologies is 0.79x versus 1.73x for Natural Gas Services Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NOV has a net margin of 22.5% compared to Geospace Technologies's net margin of 6.93%. Geospace Technologies's return on equity of -7.74% beat NOV's return on equity of 9.94%.

Geospace Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand NOV has an analysts' consensus of $18.87 which suggests that it could grow by 28.89%. Given that NOV has higher upside potential than Geospace Technologies, analysts believe NOV is more attractive than Geospace Technologies.

Geospace Technologies has a beta of 0.568, which suggesting that the stock is 43.175% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NOV has a beta of 1.663, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 66.322%.

Geospace Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NOV offers a yield of 2.05% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Geospace Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NOV pays out 17.01% of its earnings as a dividend. NOV's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Geospace Technologies quarterly revenues are $37.2M, which are smaller than NOV quarterly revenues of $2.3B. Geospace Technologies's net income of $8.4M is lower than NOV's net income of $160M. Notably, Geospace Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.06x while NOV's PE ratio is 9.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Geospace Technologies is 0.79x versus 0.65x for NOV. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.