HWKN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Green Plains has a net margin of 6.64% compared to Hawkins's net margin of -9.41%. Hawkins's return on equity of 19.29% beat Green Plains's return on equity of -9%.

Hawkins has a consensus price target of $127.00, signalling upside risk potential of 21.11%. On the other hand Green Plains has an analysts' consensus of $11.11 which suggests that it could grow by 121.56%. Given that Green Plains has higher upside potential than Hawkins, analysts believe Green Plains is more attractive than Hawkins.

Hawkins has a beta of 0.766, which suggesting that the stock is 23.389% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Green Plains has a beta of 1.552, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.169%.

Hawkins has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.67%. Green Plains offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hawkins pays 17.57% of its earnings as a dividend. Green Plains pays out -6.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Hawkins's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hawkins quarterly revenues are $226.2M, which are smaller than Green Plains quarterly revenues of $584M. Hawkins's net income of $15M is higher than Green Plains's net income of -$54.9M. Notably, Hawkins's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.75x while Green Plains's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hawkins is 2.30x versus 0.13x for Green Plains. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

International Flavors & Fragrances has a net margin of 6.64% compared to Hawkins's net margin of -1.66%. Hawkins's return on equity of 19.29% beat International Flavors & Fragrances's return on equity of 1.69%.

Hawkins has a consensus price target of $127.00, signalling upside risk potential of 21.11%. On the other hand International Flavors & Fragrances has an analysts' consensus of $99.86 which suggests that it could grow by 25.54%. Given that International Flavors & Fragrances has higher upside potential than Hawkins, analysts believe International Flavors & Fragrances is more attractive than Hawkins.

Hawkins has a beta of 0.766, which suggesting that the stock is 23.389% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison International Flavors & Fragrances has a beta of 1.209, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.948%.

Hawkins has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.67%. International Flavors & Fragrances offers a yield of 2.01% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Hawkins pays 17.57% of its earnings as a dividend. International Flavors & Fragrances pays out 211.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Hawkins's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but International Flavors & Fragrances's is not.

Hawkins quarterly revenues are $226.2M, which are smaller than International Flavors & Fragrances quarterly revenues of $2.8B. Hawkins's net income of $15M is higher than International Flavors & Fragrances's net income of -$46M. Notably, Hawkins's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.75x while International Flavors & Fragrances's PE ratio is 84.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hawkins is 2.30x versus 1.78x for International Flavors & Fragrances. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Gold Nevada has a net margin of 6.64% compared to Hawkins's net margin of --. Hawkins's return on equity of 19.29% beat Paramount Gold Nevada's return on equity of --.

Hawkins has a consensus price target of $127.00, signalling upside risk potential of 21.11%. On the other hand Paramount Gold Nevada has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 215.79%. Given that Paramount Gold Nevada has higher upside potential than Hawkins, analysts believe Paramount Gold Nevada is more attractive than Hawkins.

Hawkins has a beta of 0.766, which suggesting that the stock is 23.389% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Gold Nevada has a beta of 1.923, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 92.323%.

Hawkins has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.67%. Paramount Gold Nevada offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hawkins pays 17.57% of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Gold Nevada pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hawkins's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hawkins quarterly revenues are $226.2M, which are larger than Paramount Gold Nevada quarterly revenues of --. Hawkins's net income of $15M is higher than Paramount Gold Nevada's net income of -$2M. Notably, Hawkins's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.75x while Paramount Gold Nevada's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hawkins is 2.30x versus -- for Paramount Gold Nevada. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Solitario Resources has a net margin of 6.64% compared to Hawkins's net margin of --. Hawkins's return on equity of 19.29% beat Solitario Resources's return on equity of --.

Hawkins has a consensus price target of $127.00, signalling upside risk potential of 21.11%. On the other hand Solitario Resources has an analysts' consensus of $1.50 which suggests that it could grow by 136.52%. Given that Solitario Resources has higher upside potential than Hawkins, analysts believe Solitario Resources is more attractive than Hawkins.

Hawkins has a beta of 0.766, which suggesting that the stock is 23.389% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solitario Resources has a beta of 0.921, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.928%.

Hawkins has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.67%. Solitario Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hawkins pays 17.57% of its earnings as a dividend. Solitario Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hawkins's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hawkins quarterly revenues are $226.2M, which are larger than Solitario Resources quarterly revenues of --. Hawkins's net income of $15M is higher than Solitario Resources's net income of -$2.3M. Notably, Hawkins's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.75x while Solitario Resources's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hawkins is 2.30x versus -- for Solitario Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.