GPRE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Dow has a net margin of -9.41% compared to Green Plains's net margin of -0.51%. Green Plains's return on equity of -9% beat Dow's return on equity of 5.97%.

Green Plains has a consensus price target of $11.11, signalling upside risk potential of 121.56%. On the other hand Dow has an analysts' consensus of $45.29 which suggests that it could grow by 26.7%. Given that Green Plains has higher upside potential than Dow, analysts believe Green Plains is more attractive than Dow.

Green Plains has a beta of 1.552, which suggesting that the stock is 55.169% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dow has a beta of 1.180, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.993%.

Green Plains has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Dow offers a yield of 7.83% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share. Green Plains pays -6.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Dow pays out 176.17% of its earnings as a dividend.

Green Plains quarterly revenues are $584M, which are smaller than Dow quarterly revenues of $10.4B. Green Plains's net income of -$54.9M is lower than Dow's net income of -$53M. Notably, Green Plains's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Dow's PE ratio is 22.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Green Plains is 0.13x versus 0.59x for Dow. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gevo has a net margin of -9.41% compared to Green Plains's net margin of -1076.64%. Green Plains's return on equity of -9% beat Gevo's return on equity of -14.73%.

Green Plains has a consensus price target of $11.11, signalling upside risk potential of 121.56%. On the other hand Gevo has an analysts' consensus of $6.22 which suggests that it could grow by 409.56%. Given that Gevo has higher upside potential than Green Plains, analysts believe Gevo is more attractive than Green Plains.

Green Plains has a beta of 1.552, which suggesting that the stock is 55.169% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gevo has a beta of 2.721, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 172.065%.

Green Plains has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Gevo offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Green Plains pays -6.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Gevo pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Green Plains quarterly revenues are $584M, which are larger than Gevo quarterly revenues of $2M. Green Plains's net income of -$54.9M is lower than Gevo's net income of -$21.2M. Notably, Green Plains's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Gevo's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Green Plains is 0.13x versus 18.78x for Gevo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Gold Nevada has a net margin of -9.41% compared to Green Plains's net margin of --. Green Plains's return on equity of -9% beat Paramount Gold Nevada's return on equity of --.

Green Plains has a consensus price target of $11.11, signalling upside risk potential of 121.56%. On the other hand Paramount Gold Nevada has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 215.79%. Given that Paramount Gold Nevada has higher upside potential than Green Plains, analysts believe Paramount Gold Nevada is more attractive than Green Plains.

Green Plains has a beta of 1.552, which suggesting that the stock is 55.169% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Gold Nevada has a beta of 1.923, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 92.323%.

Green Plains has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Paramount Gold Nevada offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Green Plains pays -6.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Gold Nevada pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Green Plains quarterly revenues are $584M, which are larger than Paramount Gold Nevada quarterly revenues of --. Green Plains's net income of -$54.9M is lower than Paramount Gold Nevada's net income of -$2M. Notably, Green Plains's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Paramount Gold Nevada's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Green Plains is 0.13x versus -- for Paramount Gold Nevada. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

REX American Resources has a net margin of -9.41% compared to Green Plains's net margin of 14.01%. Green Plains's return on equity of -9% beat REX American Resources's return on equity of 11.22%.

Green Plains has a consensus price target of $11.11, signalling upside risk potential of 121.56%. On the other hand REX American Resources has an analysts' consensus of $55.00 which suggests that it could grow by 52.27%. Given that Green Plains has higher upside potential than REX American Resources, analysts believe Green Plains is more attractive than REX American Resources.

Green Plains has a beta of 1.552, which suggesting that the stock is 55.169% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison REX American Resources has a beta of 0.919, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.053%.

Green Plains has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. REX American Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Green Plains pays -6.26% of its earnings as a dividend. REX American Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Green Plains quarterly revenues are $584M, which are larger than REX American Resources quarterly revenues of $174.9M. Green Plains's net income of -$54.9M is lower than REX American Resources's net income of $24.5M. Notably, Green Plains's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while REX American Resources's PE ratio is 9.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Green Plains is 0.13x versus 0.95x for REX American Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.