HHS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

1847 Holdings LLC has a net margin of -5.17% compared to Harte-Hanks's net margin of 59.12%. Harte-Hanks's return on equity of -146.84% beat 1847 Holdings LLC's return on equity of --.

Harte-Hanks has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 263.83%. On the other hand 1847 Holdings LLC has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Harte-Hanks has higher upside potential than 1847 Holdings LLC, analysts believe Harte-Hanks is more attractive than 1847 Holdings LLC.

Harte-Hanks has a beta of 0.497, which suggesting that the stock is 50.291% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison 1847 Holdings LLC has a beta of 0.956, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.409%.

Harte-Hanks has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. 1847 Holdings LLC offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Harte-Hanks pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. 1847 Holdings LLC pays out -0.35% of its earnings as a dividend.

Harte-Hanks quarterly revenues are $47.1M, which are larger than 1847 Holdings LLC quarterly revenues of $4.8M. Harte-Hanks's net income of -$2.4M is lower than 1847 Holdings LLC's net income of $2.8M. Notably, Harte-Hanks's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while 1847 Holdings LLC's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Harte-Hanks is 0.19x versus 0.00x for 1847 Holdings LLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Matthews International has a net margin of -5.17% compared to Harte-Hanks's net margin of -0.86%. Harte-Hanks's return on equity of -146.84% beat Matthews International's return on equity of -12.82%.

Harte-Hanks has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 263.83%. On the other hand Matthews International has an analysts' consensus of $41.00 which suggests that it could grow by 76.57%. Given that Harte-Hanks has higher upside potential than Matthews International, analysts believe Harte-Hanks is more attractive than Matthews International.

Harte-Hanks has a beta of 0.497, which suggesting that the stock is 50.291% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Matthews International has a beta of 1.086, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.556%.

Harte-Hanks has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Matthews International offers a yield of 4.22% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Harte-Hanks pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Matthews International pays out -52.65% of its earnings as a dividend.

Harte-Hanks quarterly revenues are $47.1M, which are smaller than Matthews International quarterly revenues of $401.8M. Harte-Hanks's net income of -$2.4M is higher than Matthews International's net income of -$3.5M. Notably, Harte-Hanks's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Matthews International's PE ratio is 30.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Harte-Hanks is 0.19x versus 0.41x for Matthews International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Planet Green Holdings has a net margin of -5.17% compared to Harte-Hanks's net margin of -70.61%. Harte-Hanks's return on equity of -146.84% beat Planet Green Holdings's return on equity of -80.05%.

Harte-Hanks has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 263.83%. On the other hand Planet Green Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Harte-Hanks has higher upside potential than Planet Green Holdings, analysts believe Harte-Hanks is more attractive than Planet Green Holdings.

Harte-Hanks has a beta of 0.497, which suggesting that the stock is 50.291% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Planet Green Holdings has a beta of -0.498, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 149.833%.

Harte-Hanks has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Planet Green Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Harte-Hanks pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Planet Green Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Harte-Hanks quarterly revenues are $47.1M, which are larger than Planet Green Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.5M. Harte-Hanks's net income of -$2.4M is lower than Planet Green Holdings's net income of -$1.1M. Notably, Harte-Hanks's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Planet Green Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Harte-Hanks is 0.19x versus 5.88x for Planet Green Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Seaboard has a net margin of -5.17% compared to Harte-Hanks's net margin of 6.21%. Harte-Hanks's return on equity of -146.84% beat Seaboard's return on equity of 1.89%.

Harte-Hanks has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 263.83%. On the other hand Seaboard has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Harte-Hanks has higher upside potential than Seaboard, analysts believe Harte-Hanks is more attractive than Seaboard.

Harte-Hanks has a beta of 0.497, which suggesting that the stock is 50.291% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Seaboard has a beta of 0.281, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 71.922%.

Harte-Hanks has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Seaboard offers a yield of 0.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.25 per share. Harte-Hanks pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Seaboard pays out 10.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Seaboard's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Harte-Hanks quarterly revenues are $47.1M, which are smaller than Seaboard quarterly revenues of $2.5B. Harte-Hanks's net income of -$2.4M is lower than Seaboard's net income of $154M. Notably, Harte-Hanks's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Seaboard's PE ratio is 29.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Harte-Hanks is 0.19x versus 0.29x for Seaboard. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.