FORR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Blink Charging has a net margin of 0.4% compared to Forrester Research's net margin of -244.28%. Forrester Research's return on equity of -2.45% beat Blink Charging's return on equity of -56.43%.

Forrester Research has a consensus price target of $15.00, signalling upside risk potential of 62.16%. On the other hand Blink Charging has an analysts' consensus of $2.79 which suggests that it could grow by 307.51%. Given that Blink Charging has higher upside potential than Forrester Research, analysts believe Blink Charging is more attractive than Forrester Research.

Forrester Research has a beta of 0.932, which suggesting that the stock is 6.814% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Blink Charging has a beta of 2.940, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 193.966%.

Forrester Research has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Blink Charging offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Forrester Research pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Blink Charging pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Forrester Research quarterly revenues are $108M, which are larger than Blink Charging quarterly revenues of $30.1M. Forrester Research's net income of $432K is higher than Blink Charging's net income of -$73.5M. Notably, Forrester Research's price-to-earnings ratio is 239.75x while Blink Charging's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Forrester Research is 0.41x versus 0.55x for Blink Charging. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gold Rock Holdings has a net margin of 0.4% compared to Forrester Research's net margin of -3.79%. Forrester Research's return on equity of -2.45% beat Gold Rock Holdings's return on equity of --.

Forrester Research has a consensus price target of $15.00, signalling upside risk potential of 62.16%. On the other hand Gold Rock Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Forrester Research has higher upside potential than Gold Rock Holdings, analysts believe Forrester Research is more attractive than Gold Rock Holdings.

Forrester Research has a beta of 0.932, which suggesting that the stock is 6.814% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gold Rock Holdings has a beta of 6,050.483, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 604948.33%.

Forrester Research has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Gold Rock Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Forrester Research pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gold Rock Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Forrester Research quarterly revenues are $108M, which are larger than Gold Rock Holdings quarterly revenues of $66K. Forrester Research's net income of $432K is higher than Gold Rock Holdings's net income of -$2.5K. Notably, Forrester Research's price-to-earnings ratio is 239.75x while Gold Rock Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Forrester Research is 0.41x versus -- for Gold Rock Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

One World Universe has a net margin of 0.4% compared to Forrester Research's net margin of --. Forrester Research's return on equity of -2.45% beat One World Universe's return on equity of --.

Forrester Research has a consensus price target of $15.00, signalling upside risk potential of 62.16%. On the other hand One World Universe has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Forrester Research has higher upside potential than One World Universe, analysts believe Forrester Research is more attractive than One World Universe.

Forrester Research has a beta of 0.932, which suggesting that the stock is 6.814% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison One World Universe has a beta of 3.089, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 208.883%.

Forrester Research has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. One World Universe offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Forrester Research pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. One World Universe pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Forrester Research quarterly revenues are $108M, which are larger than One World Universe quarterly revenues of --. Forrester Research's net income of $432K is higher than One World Universe's net income of --. Notably, Forrester Research's price-to-earnings ratio is 239.75x while One World Universe's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Forrester Research is 0.41x versus -- for One World Universe. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SBC Medical Group Holdings has a net margin of 0.4% compared to Forrester Research's net margin of 5.34%. Forrester Research's return on equity of -2.45% beat SBC Medical Group Holdings's return on equity of 25.89%.

Forrester Research has a consensus price target of $15.00, signalling upside risk potential of 62.16%. On the other hand SBC Medical Group Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $6.00 which suggests that it could grow by 35.14%. Given that Forrester Research has higher upside potential than SBC Medical Group Holdings, analysts believe Forrester Research is more attractive than SBC Medical Group Holdings.

Forrester Research has a beta of 0.932, which suggesting that the stock is 6.814% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SBC Medical Group Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Forrester Research has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SBC Medical Group Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Forrester Research pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SBC Medical Group Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Forrester Research quarterly revenues are $108M, which are larger than SBC Medical Group Holdings quarterly revenues of $53.1M. Forrester Research's net income of $432K is lower than SBC Medical Group Holdings's net income of $2.8M. Notably, Forrester Research's price-to-earnings ratio is 239.75x while SBC Medical Group Holdings's PE ratio is 10.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Forrester Research is 0.41x versus 2.08x for SBC Medical Group Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.