GRHI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Blink Charging has a net margin of 30.92% compared to Gold Rock Holdings's net margin of -361.04%. Gold Rock Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Blink Charging's return on equity of -56.43%.

Gold Rock Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Blink Charging has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 144.57%. Given that Blink Charging has higher upside potential than Gold Rock Holdings, analysts believe Blink Charging is more attractive than Gold Rock Holdings.

Gold Rock Holdings has a beta of 5,718.571, which suggesting that the stock is 571757.147% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Blink Charging has a beta of 2.612, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 161.226%.

Gold Rock Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Blink Charging offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Gold Rock Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Blink Charging pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Gold Rock Holdings quarterly revenues are $66K, which are smaller than Blink Charging quarterly revenues of $24.2M. Gold Rock Holdings's net income of $20.4K is higher than Blink Charging's net income of -$87.4M. Notably, Gold Rock Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Blink Charging's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gold Rock Holdings is -- versus 1.10x for Blink Charging. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CRA International has a net margin of 30.92% compared to Gold Rock Holdings's net margin of 6.82%. Gold Rock Holdings's return on equity of -- beat CRA International's return on equity of 20.97%.

Gold Rock Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CRA International has an analysts' consensus of $211.00 which suggests that it could grow by 14.64%. Given that CRA International has higher upside potential than Gold Rock Holdings, analysts believe CRA International is more attractive than Gold Rock Holdings.

Gold Rock Holdings has a beta of 5,718.571, which suggesting that the stock is 571757.147% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CRA International has a beta of 1.138, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.783%.

Gold Rock Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CRA International offers a yield of 0.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share. Gold Rock Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CRA International pays out 28.08% of its earnings as a dividend. CRA International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Gold Rock Holdings quarterly revenues are $66K, which are smaller than CRA International quarterly revenues of $167.7M. Gold Rock Holdings's net income of $20.4K is lower than CRA International's net income of $11.4M. Notably, Gold Rock Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CRA International's PE ratio is 29.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gold Rock Holdings is -- versus 1.90x for CRA International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Forrester Research has a net margin of 30.92% compared to Gold Rock Holdings's net margin of -5.66%. Gold Rock Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Forrester Research's return on equity of -2.91%.

Gold Rock Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Forrester Research has an analysts' consensus of $23.00 which suggests that it could grow by 35.32%. Given that Forrester Research has higher upside potential than Gold Rock Holdings, analysts believe Forrester Research is more attractive than Gold Rock Holdings.

Gold Rock Holdings has a beta of 5,718.571, which suggesting that the stock is 571757.147% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Forrester Research has a beta of 0.911, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.853%.

Gold Rock Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Forrester Research offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Gold Rock Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Forrester Research pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Gold Rock Holdings quarterly revenues are $66K, which are smaller than Forrester Research quarterly revenues of $102.5M. Gold Rock Holdings's net income of $20.4K is higher than Forrester Research's net income of -$5.8M. Notably, Gold Rock Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Forrester Research's PE ratio is 239.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gold Rock Holdings is -- versus 0.64x for Forrester Research. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

One World Universe has a net margin of 30.92% compared to Gold Rock Holdings's net margin of --. Gold Rock Holdings's return on equity of -- beat One World Universe's return on equity of --.

Gold Rock Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand One World Universe has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Gold Rock Holdings has higher upside potential than One World Universe, analysts believe Gold Rock Holdings is more attractive than One World Universe.

Gold Rock Holdings has a beta of 5,718.571, which suggesting that the stock is 571757.147% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison One World Universe has a beta of 2.024, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 102.356%.

Gold Rock Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. One World Universe offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Gold Rock Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. One World Universe pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Gold Rock Holdings quarterly revenues are $66K, which are larger than One World Universe quarterly revenues of --. Gold Rock Holdings's net income of $20.4K is higher than One World Universe's net income of --. Notably, Gold Rock Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while One World Universe's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gold Rock Holdings is -- versus -- for One World Universe. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.