FLWS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Citi Trends has a net margin of -14.12% compared to 1-800-Flowers.com's net margin of -3.99%. 1-800-Flowers.com's return on equity of -1.94% beat Citi Trends's return on equity of -17.37%.

1-800-Flowers.com has a consensus price target of $10.88, signalling upside risk potential of 46.96%. On the other hand Citi Trends has an analysts' consensus of $28.00 which suggests that it could grow by 7.49%. Given that 1-800-Flowers.com has higher upside potential than Citi Trends, analysts believe 1-800-Flowers.com is more attractive than Citi Trends.

1-800-Flowers.com has a beta of 1.580, which suggesting that the stock is 57.975% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Citi Trends has a beta of 2.274, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 127.383%.

1-800-Flowers.com has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Citi Trends offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. 1-800-Flowers.com pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Citi Trends pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

1-800-Flowers.com quarterly revenues are $242.1M, which are larger than Citi Trends quarterly revenues of $179.1M. 1-800-Flowers.com's net income of -$34.2M is lower than Citi Trends's net income of -$7.2M. Notably, 1-800-Flowers.com's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Citi Trends's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for 1-800-Flowers.com is 0.26x versus 0.29x for Citi Trends. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Envela has a net margin of -14.12% compared to 1-800-Flowers.com's net margin of 3.59%. 1-800-Flowers.com's return on equity of -1.94% beat Envela's return on equity of 13.11%.

1-800-Flowers.com has a consensus price target of $10.88, signalling upside risk potential of 46.96%. On the other hand Envela has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 18.34%. Given that 1-800-Flowers.com has higher upside potential than Envela, analysts believe 1-800-Flowers.com is more attractive than Envela.

1-800-Flowers.com has a beta of 1.580, which suggesting that the stock is 57.975% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Envela has a beta of 0.310, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.042%.

1-800-Flowers.com has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Envela offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. 1-800-Flowers.com pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Envela pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

1-800-Flowers.com quarterly revenues are $242.1M, which are larger than Envela quarterly revenues of $46.9M. 1-800-Flowers.com's net income of -$34.2M is lower than Envela's net income of $1.7M. Notably, 1-800-Flowers.com's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Envela's PE ratio is 28.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for 1-800-Flowers.com is 0.26x versus 1.07x for Envela. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kirkland's has a net margin of -14.12% compared to 1-800-Flowers.com's net margin of -6.71%. 1-800-Flowers.com's return on equity of -1.94% beat Kirkland's's return on equity of -1677.68%.

1-800-Flowers.com has a consensus price target of $10.88, signalling upside risk potential of 46.96%. On the other hand Kirkland's has an analysts' consensus of $4.50 which suggests that it could grow by 196.05%. Given that Kirkland's has higher upside potential than 1-800-Flowers.com, analysts believe Kirkland's is more attractive than 1-800-Flowers.com.

1-800-Flowers.com has a beta of 1.580, which suggesting that the stock is 57.975% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kirkland's has a beta of 2.463, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 146.323%.

1-800-Flowers.com has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kirkland's offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. 1-800-Flowers.com pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kirkland's pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

1-800-Flowers.com quarterly revenues are $242.1M, which are larger than Kirkland's quarterly revenues of $114.4M. 1-800-Flowers.com's net income of -$34.2M is lower than Kirkland's's net income of -$7.7M. Notably, 1-800-Flowers.com's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Kirkland's's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for 1-800-Flowers.com is 0.26x versus 0.04x for Kirkland's. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

O'Reilly Automotive has a net margin of -14.12% compared to 1-800-Flowers.com's net margin of 15.25%. 1-800-Flowers.com's return on equity of -1.94% beat O'Reilly Automotive's return on equity of --.

1-800-Flowers.com has a consensus price target of $10.88, signalling upside risk potential of 46.96%. On the other hand O'Reilly Automotive has an analysts' consensus of $1,272.67 which suggests that it could grow by 5.68%. Given that 1-800-Flowers.com has higher upside potential than O'Reilly Automotive, analysts believe 1-800-Flowers.com is more attractive than O'Reilly Automotive.

1-800-Flowers.com has a beta of 1.580, which suggesting that the stock is 57.975% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison O'Reilly Automotive has a beta of 0.938, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.198%.

1-800-Flowers.com has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. O'Reilly Automotive offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. 1-800-Flowers.com pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. O'Reilly Automotive pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

1-800-Flowers.com quarterly revenues are $242.1M, which are smaller than O'Reilly Automotive quarterly revenues of $4.4B. 1-800-Flowers.com's net income of -$34.2M is lower than O'Reilly Automotive's net income of $665.5M. Notably, 1-800-Flowers.com's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while O'Reilly Automotive's PE ratio is 29.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for 1-800-Flowers.com is 0.26x versus 4.33x for O'Reilly Automotive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.