ESSA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Broadway Financial has a net margin of 24.42% compared to ESSA Bancorp's net margin of 15.71%. ESSA Bancorp's return on equity of 7.32% beat Broadway Financial's return on equity of 0.68%.

ESSA Bancorp has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 0.11%. On the other hand Broadway Financial has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ESSA Bancorp has higher upside potential than Broadway Financial, analysts believe ESSA Bancorp is more attractive than Broadway Financial.

ESSA Bancorp has a beta of 0.321, which suggesting that the stock is 67.898% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Broadway Financial has a beta of 0.734, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.616%.

ESSA Bancorp has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.16%. Broadway Financial offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ESSA Bancorp pays 34.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Broadway Financial pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. ESSA Bancorp's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ESSA Bancorp quarterly revenues are $16.2M, which are larger than Broadway Financial quarterly revenues of $8.3M. ESSA Bancorp's net income of $4M is higher than Broadway Financial's net income of $1.3M. Notably, ESSA Bancorp's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.91x while Broadway Financial's PE ratio is 169.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ESSA Bancorp is 2.73x versus 1.78x for Broadway Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Carver Bancorp has a net margin of 24.42% compared to ESSA Bancorp's net margin of -149.1%. ESSA Bancorp's return on equity of 7.32% beat Carver Bancorp's return on equity of -25.28%.

ESSA Bancorp has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 0.11%. On the other hand Carver Bancorp has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 20879.01%. Given that Carver Bancorp has higher upside potential than ESSA Bancorp, analysts believe Carver Bancorp is more attractive than ESSA Bancorp.

ESSA Bancorp has a beta of 0.321, which suggesting that the stock is 67.898% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Carver Bancorp has a beta of 1.110, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.009%.

ESSA Bancorp has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.16%. Carver Bancorp offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ESSA Bancorp pays 34.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Carver Bancorp pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. ESSA Bancorp's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ESSA Bancorp quarterly revenues are $16.2M, which are larger than Carver Bancorp quarterly revenues of $3.8M. ESSA Bancorp's net income of $4M is higher than Carver Bancorp's net income of -$5.6M. Notably, ESSA Bancorp's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.91x while Carver Bancorp's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ESSA Bancorp is 2.73x versus 0.30x for Carver Bancorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pathward Financial has a net margin of 24.42% compared to ESSA Bancorp's net margin of 25.42%. ESSA Bancorp's return on equity of 7.32% beat Pathward Financial's return on equity of 22.35%.

ESSA Bancorp has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 0.11%. On the other hand Pathward Financial has an analysts' consensus of $86.00 which suggests that it could grow by 17.33%. Given that Pathward Financial has higher upside potential than ESSA Bancorp, analysts believe Pathward Financial is more attractive than ESSA Bancorp.

ESSA Bancorp has a beta of 0.321, which suggesting that the stock is 67.898% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pathward Financial has a beta of 0.445, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.503%.

ESSA Bancorp has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.16%. Pathward Financial offers a yield of 0.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. ESSA Bancorp pays 34.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Pathward Financial pays out 3.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ESSA Bancorp quarterly revenues are $16.2M, which are smaller than Pathward Financial quarterly revenues of $123.7M. ESSA Bancorp's net income of $4M is lower than Pathward Financial's net income of $31.4M. Notably, ESSA Bancorp's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.91x while Pathward Financial's PE ratio is 11.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ESSA Bancorp is 2.73x versus 3.12x for Pathward Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CNB Financial has a net margin of 24.42% compared to ESSA Bancorp's net margin of 25.96%. ESSA Bancorp's return on equity of 7.32% beat CNB Financial's return on equity of 9.24%.

ESSA Bancorp has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 0.11%. On the other hand CNB Financial has an analysts' consensus of $28.00 which suggests that it could grow by 24.39%. Given that CNB Financial has higher upside potential than ESSA Bancorp, analysts believe CNB Financial is more attractive than ESSA Bancorp.

ESSA Bancorp has a beta of 0.321, which suggesting that the stock is 67.898% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CNB Financial has a beta of 0.528, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.18%.

ESSA Bancorp has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.16%. CNB Financial offers a yield of 3.18% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. ESSA Bancorp pays 34.75% of its earnings as a dividend. CNB Financial pays out 35.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ESSA Bancorp quarterly revenues are $16.2M, which are smaller than CNB Financial quarterly revenues of $58M. ESSA Bancorp's net income of $4M is lower than CNB Financial's net income of $15.1M. Notably, ESSA Bancorp's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.91x while CNB Financial's PE ratio is 9.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ESSA Bancorp is 2.73x versus 2.12x for CNB Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.