CTCX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Church & Dwight has a net margin of -14028.37% compared to Carmell's net margin of -4.97%. Carmell's return on equity of -- beat Church & Dwight's return on equity of 13.41%.

Carmell has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Church & Dwight has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -0.17%. Given that Church & Dwight has higher upside potential than Carmell, analysts believe Church & Dwight is more attractive than Carmell.

Carmell has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Church & Dwight has a beta of 0.574, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.585%.

Carmell has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Church & Dwight offers a yield of 1.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Carmell pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Church & Dwight pays out 35.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Church & Dwight's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Carmell quarterly revenues are $20.5K, which are smaller than Church & Dwight quarterly revenues of $1.5B. Carmell's net income of -$2.9M is higher than Church & Dwight's net income of -$75.1M. Notably, Carmell's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Church & Dwight's PE ratio is 47.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Carmell is -- versus 4.32x for Church & Dwight. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Colgate-Palmolive has a net margin of -14028.37% compared to Carmell's net margin of 14.64%. Carmell's return on equity of -- beat Colgate-Palmolive's return on equity of 434.96%.

Carmell has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Colgate-Palmolive has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 14.1%. Given that Colgate-Palmolive has higher upside potential than Carmell, analysts believe Colgate-Palmolive is more attractive than Carmell.

Carmell has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Colgate-Palmolive has a beta of 0.425, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.48%.

Carmell has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Colgate-Palmolive offers a yield of 2.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Carmell pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Colgate-Palmolive pays out 76.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Colgate-Palmolive's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Carmell quarterly revenues are $20.5K, which are smaller than Colgate-Palmolive quarterly revenues of $5B. Carmell's net income of -$2.9M is lower than Colgate-Palmolive's net income of $737M. Notably, Carmell's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Colgate-Palmolive's PE ratio is 26.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Carmell is -- versus 3.77x for Colgate-Palmolive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RegalWorks Media has a net margin of -14028.37% compared to Carmell's net margin of --. Carmell's return on equity of -- beat RegalWorks Media's return on equity of --.

Carmell has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand RegalWorks Media has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Carmell has higher upside potential than RegalWorks Media, analysts believe Carmell is more attractive than RegalWorks Media.

Carmell has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RegalWorks Media has a beta of 0.010, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 99.048%.

Carmell has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. RegalWorks Media offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Carmell pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. RegalWorks Media pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Carmell quarterly revenues are $20.5K, which are larger than RegalWorks Media quarterly revenues of --. Carmell's net income of -$2.9M is higher than RegalWorks Media's net income of --. Notably, Carmell's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while RegalWorks Media's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Carmell is -- versus -- for RegalWorks Media. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Spectrum Brands Holdings has a net margin of -14028.37% compared to Carmell's net margin of 3.7%. Carmell's return on equity of -- beat Spectrum Brands Holdings's return on equity of 5.52%.

Carmell has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Spectrum Brands Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 22.76%. Given that Spectrum Brands Holdings has higher upside potential than Carmell, analysts believe Spectrum Brands Holdings is more attractive than Carmell.

Carmell has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Spectrum Brands Holdings has a beta of 1.193, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.272%.

Carmell has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Spectrum Brands Holdings offers a yield of 2.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. Carmell pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Spectrum Brands Holdings pays out 40.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Spectrum Brands Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Carmell quarterly revenues are $20.5K, which are smaller than Spectrum Brands Holdings quarterly revenues of $773.7M. Carmell's net income of -$2.9M is lower than Spectrum Brands Holdings's net income of $28.6M. Notably, Carmell's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Spectrum Brands Holdings's PE ratio is 20.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Carmell is -- versus 0.88x for Spectrum Brands Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.