CHCI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

American Realty Investors has a net margin of 18.29% compared to Comstock Holding's net margin of -150.43%. Comstock Holding's return on equity of 15.96% beat American Realty Investors's return on equity of -2.04%.

Comstock Holding has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -14.63%. On the other hand American Realty Investors has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Comstock Holding has higher upside potential than American Realty Investors, analysts believe Comstock Holding is more attractive than American Realty Investors.

Comstock Holding has a beta of 0.656, which suggesting that the stock is 34.366% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison American Realty Investors has a beta of 0.653, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.734%.

Comstock Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. American Realty Investors offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Comstock Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. American Realty Investors pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Comstock Holding quarterly revenues are $13M, which are larger than American Realty Investors quarterly revenues of $11.6M. Comstock Holding's net income of $2.4M is higher than American Realty Investors's net income of -$17.5M. Notably, Comstock Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.90x while American Realty Investors's PE ratio is 82.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Comstock Holding is 1.85x versus 5.08x for American Realty Investors. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Diversified Healthcare Trust has a net margin of 18.29% compared to Comstock Holding's net margin of -26.41%. Comstock Holding's return on equity of 15.96% beat Diversified Healthcare Trust's return on equity of -17.17%.

Comstock Holding has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -14.63%. On the other hand Diversified Healthcare Trust has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 54.19%. Given that Diversified Healthcare Trust has higher upside potential than Comstock Holding, analysts believe Diversified Healthcare Trust is more attractive than Comstock Holding.

Comstock Holding has a beta of 0.656, which suggesting that the stock is 34.366% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Diversified Healthcare Trust has a beta of 2.174, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 117.372%.

Comstock Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Diversified Healthcare Trust offers a yield of 1.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Comstock Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Diversified Healthcare Trust pays out -3.27% of its earnings as a dividend.

Comstock Holding quarterly revenues are $13M, which are smaller than Diversified Healthcare Trust quarterly revenues of $373.6M. Comstock Holding's net income of $2.4M is higher than Diversified Healthcare Trust's net income of -$98.7M. Notably, Comstock Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.90x while Diversified Healthcare Trust's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Comstock Holding is 1.85x versus 0.37x for Diversified Healthcare Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

New England Realty Associates LP has a net margin of 18.29% compared to Comstock Holding's net margin of 19.35%. Comstock Holding's return on equity of 15.96% beat New England Realty Associates LP's return on equity of --.

Comstock Holding has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -14.63%. On the other hand New England Realty Associates LP has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Comstock Holding has higher upside potential than New England Realty Associates LP, analysts believe Comstock Holding is more attractive than New England Realty Associates LP.

Comstock Holding has a beta of 0.656, which suggesting that the stock is 34.366% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison New England Realty Associates LP has a beta of 0.334, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 66.591%.

Comstock Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. New England Realty Associates LP offers a yield of 1.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Comstock Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. New England Realty Associates LP pays out 117.75% of its earnings as a dividend.

Comstock Holding quarterly revenues are $13M, which are smaller than New England Realty Associates LP quarterly revenues of $20.2M. Comstock Holding's net income of $2.4M is lower than New England Realty Associates LP's net income of $3.9M. Notably, Comstock Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.90x while New England Realty Associates LP's PE ratio is 21.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Comstock Holding is 1.85x versus 3.68x for New England Realty Associates LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Star Holdings has a net margin of 18.29% compared to Comstock Holding's net margin of -113.92%. Comstock Holding's return on equity of 15.96% beat Star Holdings's return on equity of 20.77%.

Comstock Holding has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -14.63%. On the other hand Star Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Comstock Holding has higher upside potential than Star Holdings, analysts believe Comstock Holding is more attractive than Star Holdings.

Comstock Holding has a beta of 0.656, which suggesting that the stock is 34.366% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Star Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Comstock Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Star Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Comstock Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Star Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Comstock Holding quarterly revenues are $13M, which are smaller than Star Holdings quarterly revenues of $17.6M. Comstock Holding's net income of $2.4M is lower than Star Holdings's net income of $91.9M. Notably, Comstock Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.90x while Star Holdings's PE ratio is 1.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Comstock Holding is 1.85x versus 1.35x for Star Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.