WM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Casella Waste Systems has a net margin of 13.55% compared to Waste Management's net margin of 1.4%. Waste Management's return on equity of 36.31% beat Casella Waste Systems's return on equity of 0.61%.

Waste Management has a consensus price target of $231.85, signalling upside risk potential of 12.23%. On the other hand Casella Waste Systems has an analysts' consensus of $103.57 which suggests that it could grow by 7.99%. Given that Waste Management has higher upside potential than Casella Waste Systems, analysts believe Waste Management is more attractive than Casella Waste Systems.

Waste Management has a beta of 0.771, which suggesting that the stock is 22.869% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Casella Waste Systems has a beta of 1.031, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.054%.

Waste Management has a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.45%. Casella Waste Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Waste Management pays 49.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Casella Waste Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Waste Management's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Waste Management quarterly revenues are $5.6B, which are larger than Casella Waste Systems quarterly revenues of $411.6M. Waste Management's net income of $760M is higher than Casella Waste Systems's net income of $5.8M. Notably, Waste Management's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.59x while Casella Waste Systems's PE ratio is 895.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Waste Management is 3.90x versus 4.21x for Casella Waste Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pacific Green Technologies has a net margin of 13.55% compared to Waste Management's net margin of --. Waste Management's return on equity of 36.31% beat Pacific Green Technologies's return on equity of --.

Waste Management has a consensus price target of $231.85, signalling upside risk potential of 12.23%. On the other hand Pacific Green Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Waste Management has higher upside potential than Pacific Green Technologies, analysts believe Waste Management is more attractive than Pacific Green Technologies.

Waste Management has a beta of 0.771, which suggesting that the stock is 22.869% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pacific Green Technologies has a beta of 1.069, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.928%.

Waste Management has a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.45%. Pacific Green Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Waste Management pays 49.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Pacific Green Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Waste Management's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Waste Management quarterly revenues are $5.6B, which are larger than Pacific Green Technologies quarterly revenues of --. Waste Management's net income of $760M is higher than Pacific Green Technologies's net income of --. Notably, Waste Management's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.59x while Pacific Green Technologies's PE ratio is 3.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Waste Management is 3.90x versus 0.22x for Pacific Green Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Plastic2Oil has a net margin of 13.55% compared to Waste Management's net margin of --. Waste Management's return on equity of 36.31% beat Plastic2Oil's return on equity of --.

Waste Management has a consensus price target of $231.85, signalling upside risk potential of 12.23%. On the other hand Plastic2Oil has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Waste Management has higher upside potential than Plastic2Oil, analysts believe Waste Management is more attractive than Plastic2Oil.

Waste Management has a beta of 0.771, which suggesting that the stock is 22.869% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Plastic2Oil has a beta of -0.177, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 117.709%.

Waste Management has a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.45%. Plastic2Oil offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Waste Management pays 49.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Plastic2Oil pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Waste Management's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Waste Management quarterly revenues are $5.6B, which are larger than Plastic2Oil quarterly revenues of --. Waste Management's net income of $760M is higher than Plastic2Oil's net income of --. Notably, Waste Management's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.59x while Plastic2Oil's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Waste Management is 3.90x versus -- for Plastic2Oil. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Republic Services has a net margin of 13.55% compared to Waste Management's net margin of 13.88%. Waste Management's return on equity of 36.31% beat Republic Services's return on equity of 18.27%.

Waste Management has a consensus price target of $231.85, signalling upside risk potential of 12.23%. On the other hand Republic Services has an analysts' consensus of $222.67 which suggests that it could grow by 7.59%. Given that Waste Management has higher upside potential than Republic Services, analysts believe Waste Management is more attractive than Republic Services.

Waste Management has a beta of 0.771, which suggesting that the stock is 22.869% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Republic Services has a beta of 0.732, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.841%.

Waste Management has a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.45%. Republic Services offers a yield of 1.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share. Waste Management pays 49.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Republic Services pays out 36.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Waste Management quarterly revenues are $5.6B, which are larger than Republic Services quarterly revenues of $4.1B. Waste Management's net income of $760M is higher than Republic Services's net income of $565.7M. Notably, Waste Management's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.59x while Republic Services's PE ratio is 33.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Waste Management is 3.90x versus 4.13x for Republic Services. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.