VRSN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Castellum has a net margin of 51.54% compared to VeriSign's net margin of -11.03%. VeriSign's return on equity of -- beat Castellum's return on equity of -74.03%.

VeriSign has a consensus price target of $219.78, signalling upside risk potential of 4.32%. On the other hand Castellum has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -21.77%. Given that VeriSign has higher upside potential than Castellum, analysts believe VeriSign is more attractive than Castellum.

VeriSign has a beta of 0.887, which suggesting that the stock is 11.3% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Castellum has a beta of -2.951, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 395.117%.

VeriSign has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Castellum offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. VeriSign pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Castellum pays out -0.66% of its earnings as a dividend.

VeriSign quarterly revenues are $390.6M, which are larger than Castellum quarterly revenues of $11.6M. VeriSign's net income of $201.3M is higher than Castellum's net income of -$1.3M. Notably, VeriSign's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.50x while Castellum's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VeriSign is 13.63x versus 1.76x for Castellum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Exodus Movement has a net margin of 51.54% compared to VeriSign's net margin of 4.19%. VeriSign's return on equity of -- beat Exodus Movement's return on equity of 23.63%.

VeriSign has a consensus price target of $219.78, signalling upside risk potential of 4.32%. On the other hand Exodus Movement has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that VeriSign has higher upside potential than Exodus Movement, analysts believe VeriSign is more attractive than Exodus Movement.

VeriSign has a beta of 0.887, which suggesting that the stock is 11.3% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Exodus Movement has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

VeriSign has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Exodus Movement offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. VeriSign pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Exodus Movement pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

VeriSign quarterly revenues are $390.6M, which are larger than Exodus Movement quarterly revenues of $20.1M. VeriSign's net income of $201.3M is higher than Exodus Movement's net income of $843K. Notably, VeriSign's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.50x while Exodus Movement's PE ratio is 28.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VeriSign is 13.63x versus 13.73x for Exodus Movement. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Grid Dynamics Holdings has a net margin of 51.54% compared to VeriSign's net margin of 4.9%. VeriSign's return on equity of -- beat Grid Dynamics Holdings's return on equity of 0.63%.

VeriSign has a consensus price target of $219.78, signalling upside risk potential of 4.32%. On the other hand Grid Dynamics Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $19.75 which suggests that it could fall by -5.32%. Given that VeriSign has higher upside potential than Grid Dynamics Holdings, analysts believe VeriSign is more attractive than Grid Dynamics Holdings.

VeriSign has a beta of 0.887, which suggesting that the stock is 11.3% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Grid Dynamics Holdings has a beta of 1.010, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.95000000000001%.

VeriSign has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Grid Dynamics Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. VeriSign pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Grid Dynamics Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

VeriSign quarterly revenues are $390.6M, which are larger than Grid Dynamics Holdings quarterly revenues of $87.4M. VeriSign's net income of $201.3M is higher than Grid Dynamics Holdings's net income of $4.3M. Notably, VeriSign's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.50x while Grid Dynamics Holdings's PE ratio is 739.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VeriSign is 13.63x versus 5.19x for Grid Dynamics Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marti Technologies has a net margin of 51.54% compared to VeriSign's net margin of --. VeriSign's return on equity of -- beat Marti Technologies's return on equity of --.

VeriSign has a consensus price target of $219.78, signalling upside risk potential of 4.32%. On the other hand Marti Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -14.77%. Given that VeriSign has higher upside potential than Marti Technologies, analysts believe VeriSign is more attractive than Marti Technologies.

VeriSign has a beta of 0.887, which suggesting that the stock is 11.3% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marti Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

VeriSign has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Marti Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. VeriSign pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Marti Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

VeriSign quarterly revenues are $390.6M, which are larger than Marti Technologies quarterly revenues of --. VeriSign's net income of $201.3M is higher than Marti Technologies's net income of --. Notably, VeriSign's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.50x while Marti Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VeriSign is 13.63x versus 10.46x for Marti Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.