SWK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

ESAB has a net margin of 5.24% compared to Stanley Black & Decker's net margin of 8.01%. Stanley Black & Decker's return on equity of 3.33% beat ESAB's return on equity of 15.11%.

Stanley Black & Decker has a consensus price target of $101.34, signalling upside risk potential of 27.37%. On the other hand ESAB has an analysts' consensus of $133.80 which suggests that it could grow by 12.48%. Given that Stanley Black & Decker has higher upside potential than ESAB, analysts believe Stanley Black & Decker is more attractive than ESAB.

Stanley Black & Decker has a beta of 1.257, which suggesting that the stock is 25.721% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ESAB has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Stanley Black & Decker has a quarterly dividend of $0.82 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.11%. ESAB offers a yield of 0.25% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Stanley Black & Decker pays 166.91% of its earnings as a dividend. ESAB pays out 6.42% of its earnings as a dividend. ESAB's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Stanley Black & Decker's is not.

Stanley Black & Decker quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are larger than ESAB quarterly revenues of $670.8M. Stanley Black & Decker's net income of $194.9M is higher than ESAB's net income of $53.7M. Notably, Stanley Black & Decker's price-to-earnings ratio is 41.01x while ESAB's PE ratio is 27.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Stanley Black & Decker is 0.78x versus 2.65x for ESAB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kennametal has a net margin of 5.24% compared to Stanley Black & Decker's net margin of 3.72%. Stanley Black & Decker's return on equity of 3.33% beat Kennametal's return on equity of 7.4%.

Stanley Black & Decker has a consensus price target of $101.34, signalling upside risk potential of 27.37%. On the other hand Kennametal has an analysts' consensus of $23.00 which suggests that it could grow by 6.33%. Given that Stanley Black & Decker has higher upside potential than Kennametal, analysts believe Stanley Black & Decker is more attractive than Kennametal.

Stanley Black & Decker has a beta of 1.257, which suggesting that the stock is 25.721% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kennametal has a beta of 1.694, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.41%.

Stanley Black & Decker has a quarterly dividend of $0.82 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.11%. Kennametal offers a yield of 3.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Stanley Black & Decker pays 166.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Kennametal pays out 58.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Kennametal's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Stanley Black & Decker's is not.

Stanley Black & Decker quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are larger than Kennametal quarterly revenues of $482.1M. Stanley Black & Decker's net income of $194.9M is higher than Kennametal's net income of $17.9M. Notably, Stanley Black & Decker's price-to-earnings ratio is 41.01x while Kennametal's PE ratio is 17.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Stanley Black & Decker is 0.78x versus 0.85x for Kennametal. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Proto Labs has a net margin of 5.24% compared to Stanley Black & Decker's net margin of -0.33%. Stanley Black & Decker's return on equity of 3.33% beat Proto Labs's return on equity of 2.43%.

Stanley Black & Decker has a consensus price target of $101.34, signalling upside risk potential of 27.37%. On the other hand Proto Labs has an analysts' consensus of $44.33 which suggests that it could grow by 22.2%. Given that Stanley Black & Decker has higher upside potential than Proto Labs, analysts believe Stanley Black & Decker is more attractive than Proto Labs.

Stanley Black & Decker has a beta of 1.257, which suggesting that the stock is 25.721% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Proto Labs has a beta of 1.447, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.658%.

Stanley Black & Decker has a quarterly dividend of $0.82 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.11%. Proto Labs offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Stanley Black & Decker pays 166.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Proto Labs pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Stanley Black & Decker quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are larger than Proto Labs quarterly revenues of $121.8M. Stanley Black & Decker's net income of $194.9M is higher than Proto Labs's net income of -$404K. Notably, Stanley Black & Decker's price-to-earnings ratio is 41.01x while Proto Labs's PE ratio is 55.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Stanley Black & Decker is 0.78x versus 1.83x for Proto Labs. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RM2 International has a net margin of 5.24% compared to Stanley Black & Decker's net margin of --. Stanley Black & Decker's return on equity of 3.33% beat RM2 International's return on equity of --.

Stanley Black & Decker has a consensus price target of $101.34, signalling upside risk potential of 27.37%. On the other hand RM2 International has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 4900%. Given that RM2 International has higher upside potential than Stanley Black & Decker, analysts believe RM2 International is more attractive than Stanley Black & Decker.

Stanley Black & Decker has a beta of 1.257, which suggesting that the stock is 25.721% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RM2 International has a beta of 0.658, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.164%.

Stanley Black & Decker has a quarterly dividend of $0.82 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.11%. RM2 International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Stanley Black & Decker pays 166.91% of its earnings as a dividend. RM2 International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Stanley Black & Decker quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are larger than RM2 International quarterly revenues of --. Stanley Black & Decker's net income of $194.9M is higher than RM2 International's net income of --. Notably, Stanley Black & Decker's price-to-earnings ratio is 41.01x while RM2 International's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Stanley Black & Decker is 0.78x versus 0.02x for RM2 International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.