SLG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

National Health Investors has a net margin of 6.2% compared to SL Green Realty's net margin of 50.43%. SL Green Realty's return on equity of 0.72% beat National Health Investors's return on equity of 10.72%.

SL Green Realty has a consensus price target of $67.61, signalling upside risk potential of 33.54%. On the other hand National Health Investors has an analysts' consensus of $82.14 which suggests that it could grow by 14.98%. Given that SL Green Realty has higher upside potential than National Health Investors, analysts believe SL Green Realty is more attractive than National Health Investors.

SL Green Realty has a beta of 1.599, which suggesting that the stock is 59.918% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison National Health Investors has a beta of 0.788, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.162%.

SL Green Realty has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.99%. National Health Investors offers a yield of 5.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.90 per share. SL Green Realty pays 713.87% of its earnings as a dividend. National Health Investors pays out 113.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SL Green Realty quarterly revenues are $245.9M, which are larger than National Health Investors quarterly revenues of $85.8M. SL Green Realty's net income of $15.3M is lower than National Health Investors's net income of $43.2M. Notably, SL Green Realty's price-to-earnings ratio is 632.88x while National Health Investors's PE ratio is 22.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SL Green Realty is 3.90x versus 9.40x for National Health Investors. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Prologis has a net margin of 6.2% compared to SL Green Realty's net margin of 58.11%. SL Green Realty's return on equity of 0.72% beat Prologis's return on equity of 6.44%.

SL Green Realty has a consensus price target of $67.61, signalling upside risk potential of 33.54%. On the other hand Prologis has an analysts' consensus of $129.70 which suggests that it could grow by 32.04%. Given that SL Green Realty has higher upside potential than Prologis, analysts believe SL Green Realty is more attractive than Prologis.

SL Green Realty has a beta of 1.599, which suggesting that the stock is 59.918% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Prologis has a beta of 1.206, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.608%.

SL Green Realty has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.99%. Prologis offers a yield of 3.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.01 per share. SL Green Realty pays 713.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Prologis pays out 95.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Prologis's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but SL Green Realty's is not.

SL Green Realty quarterly revenues are $245.9M, which are smaller than Prologis quarterly revenues of $2.2B. SL Green Realty's net income of $15.3M is lower than Prologis's net income of $1.3B. Notably, SL Green Realty's price-to-earnings ratio is 632.88x while Prologis's PE ratio is 24.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SL Green Realty is 3.90x versus 11.42x for Prologis. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vornado Realty Trust has a net margin of 6.2% compared to SL Green Realty's net margin of 3.65%. SL Green Realty's return on equity of 0.72% beat Vornado Realty Trust's return on equity of 1.12%.

SL Green Realty has a consensus price target of $67.61, signalling upside risk potential of 33.54%. On the other hand Vornado Realty Trust has an analysts' consensus of $39.21 which suggests that it could grow by 18.83%. Given that SL Green Realty has higher upside potential than Vornado Realty Trust, analysts believe SL Green Realty is more attractive than Vornado Realty Trust.

SL Green Realty has a beta of 1.599, which suggesting that the stock is 59.918% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vornado Realty Trust has a beta of 1.497, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.712%.

SL Green Realty has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.99%. Vornado Realty Trust offers a yield of 2.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.74 per share. SL Green Realty pays 713.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Vornado Realty Trust pays out 288.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SL Green Realty quarterly revenues are $245.9M, which are smaller than Vornado Realty Trust quarterly revenues of $457.8M. SL Green Realty's net income of $15.3M is lower than Vornado Realty Trust's net income of $16.7M. Notably, SL Green Realty's price-to-earnings ratio is 632.88x while Vornado Realty Trust's PE ratio is 825.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SL Green Realty is 3.90x versus 3.58x for Vornado Realty Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Welltower has a net margin of 6.2% compared to SL Green Realty's net margin of 5.41%. SL Green Realty's return on equity of 0.72% beat Welltower's return on equity of 3.21%.

SL Green Realty has a consensus price target of $67.61, signalling upside risk potential of 33.54%. On the other hand Welltower has an analysts' consensus of $165.16 which suggests that it could grow by 15.26%. Given that SL Green Realty has higher upside potential than Welltower, analysts believe SL Green Realty is more attractive than Welltower.

SL Green Realty has a beta of 1.599, which suggesting that the stock is 59.918% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Welltower has a beta of 0.932, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.829%.

SL Green Realty has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.99%. Welltower offers a yield of 1.83% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.67 per share. SL Green Realty pays 713.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Welltower pays out 162.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SL Green Realty quarterly revenues are $245.9M, which are smaller than Welltower quarterly revenues of $2.2B. SL Green Realty's net income of $15.3M is lower than Welltower's net income of $120M. Notably, SL Green Realty's price-to-earnings ratio is 632.88x while Welltower's PE ratio is 91.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SL Green Realty is 3.90x versus 11.11x for Welltower. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.