R Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

DriveItAway Holdings has a net margin of 4.46% compared to Ryder System's net margin of -479.76%. Ryder System's return on equity of 15.55% beat DriveItAway Holdings's return on equity of --.

Ryder System has a consensus price target of $163.70, signalling upside risk potential of 4.42%. On the other hand DriveItAway Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ryder System has higher upside potential than DriveItAway Holdings, analysts believe Ryder System is more attractive than DriveItAway Holdings.

Ryder System has a beta of 1.298, which suggesting that the stock is 29.778% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DriveItAway Holdings has a beta of -5.913, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 691.252%.

Ryder System has a quarterly dividend of $0.81 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.94%. DriveItAway Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ryder System pays 31.53% of its earnings as a dividend. DriveItAway Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ryder System's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ryder System quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are larger than DriveItAway Holdings quarterly revenues of $110.4K. Ryder System's net income of $142M is higher than DriveItAway Holdings's net income of -$529.7K. Notably, Ryder System's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.67x while DriveItAway Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ryder System is 0.56x versus 5.13x for DriveItAway Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

H&E Equipment Services has a net margin of 4.46% compared to Ryder System's net margin of 8.07%. Ryder System's return on equity of 15.55% beat H&E Equipment Services's return on equity of 26.17%.

Ryder System has a consensus price target of $163.70, signalling upside risk potential of 4.42%. On the other hand H&E Equipment Services has an analysts' consensus of $69.40 which suggests that it could grow by 31.1%. Given that H&E Equipment Services has higher upside potential than Ryder System, analysts believe H&E Equipment Services is more attractive than Ryder System.

Ryder System has a beta of 1.298, which suggesting that the stock is 29.778% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison H&E Equipment Services has a beta of 1.844, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 84.439%.

Ryder System has a quarterly dividend of $0.81 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.94%. H&E Equipment Services offers a yield of 2.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Ryder System pays 31.53% of its earnings as a dividend. H&E Equipment Services pays out 23.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ryder System quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are larger than H&E Equipment Services quarterly revenues of $384.9M. Ryder System's net income of $142M is higher than H&E Equipment Services's net income of $31.1M. Notably, Ryder System's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.67x while H&E Equipment Services's PE ratio is 12.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ryder System is 0.56x versus 1.18x for H&E Equipment Services. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hertz Global Holdings has a net margin of 4.46% compared to Ryder System's net margin of -51.71%. Ryder System's return on equity of 15.55% beat Hertz Global Holdings's return on equity of -114.43%.

Ryder System has a consensus price target of $163.70, signalling upside risk potential of 4.42%. On the other hand Hertz Global Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $8.57 which suggests that it could grow by 2.13%. Given that Ryder System has higher upside potential than Hertz Global Holdings, analysts believe Ryder System is more attractive than Hertz Global Holdings.

Ryder System has a beta of 1.298, which suggesting that the stock is 29.778% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hertz Global Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Ryder System has a quarterly dividend of $0.81 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.94%. Hertz Global Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ryder System pays 31.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Hertz Global Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ryder System's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ryder System quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are larger than Hertz Global Holdings quarterly revenues of $2.6B. Ryder System's net income of $142M is higher than Hertz Global Holdings's net income of -$1.3B. Notably, Ryder System's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.67x while Hertz Global Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ryder System is 0.56x versus 0.11x for Hertz Global Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

U-Haul Holding has a net margin of 4.46% compared to Ryder System's net margin of 11.27%. Ryder System's return on equity of 15.55% beat U-Haul Holding's return on equity of 6.65%.

Ryder System has a consensus price target of $163.70, signalling upside risk potential of 4.42%. On the other hand U-Haul Holding has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 42.23%. Given that U-Haul Holding has higher upside potential than Ryder System, analysts believe U-Haul Holding is more attractive than Ryder System.

Ryder System has a beta of 1.298, which suggesting that the stock is 29.778% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison U-Haul Holding has a beta of 1.091, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.09%.

Ryder System has a quarterly dividend of $0.81 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.94%. U-Haul Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ryder System pays 31.53% of its earnings as a dividend. U-Haul Holding pays out 5.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ryder System quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are larger than U-Haul Holding quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Ryder System's net income of $142M is lower than U-Haul Holding's net income of $186.8M. Notably, Ryder System's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.67x while U-Haul Holding's PE ratio is 30.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ryder System is 0.56x versus 2.41x for U-Haul Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.