PX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Blackstone has a net margin of 1.89% compared to P10's net margin of 27.05%. P10's return on equity of 3.02% beat Blackstone's return on equity of 11.9%.

P10 has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 14.56%. On the other hand Blackstone has an analysts' consensus of $178.70 which suggests that it could grow by 1.71%. Given that P10 has higher upside potential than Blackstone, analysts believe P10 is more attractive than Blackstone.

P10 has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Blackstone has a beta of 1.510, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.041%.

P10 has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.08%. Blackstone offers a yield of 1.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.86 per share. P10 pays -215.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Blackstone pays out 306.89% of its earnings as a dividend.

P10 quarterly revenues are $74.2M, which are smaller than Blackstone quarterly revenues of $2.9B. P10's net income of $1.4M is lower than Blackstone's net income of $780.8M. Notably, P10's price-to-earnings ratio is 127.20x while Blackstone's PE ratio is 60.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for P10 is 5.54x versus 14.38x for Blackstone. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

US Global Investors has a net margin of 1.89% compared to P10's net margin of 14.6%. P10's return on equity of 3.02% beat US Global Investors's return on equity of 3.67%.

P10 has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 14.56%. On the other hand US Global Investors has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that P10 has higher upside potential than US Global Investors, analysts believe P10 is more attractive than US Global Investors.

P10 has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison US Global Investors has a beta of 1.836, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 83.562%.

P10 has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.08%. US Global Investors offers a yield of 3.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. P10 pays -215.98% of its earnings as a dividend. US Global Investors pays out 95.87% of its earnings as a dividend. US Global Investors's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

P10 quarterly revenues are $74.2M, which are larger than US Global Investors quarterly revenues of $2.2M. P10's net income of $1.4M is higher than US Global Investors's net income of $315K. Notably, P10's price-to-earnings ratio is 127.20x while US Global Investors's PE ratio is 18.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for P10 is 5.54x versus 3.38x for US Global Investors. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Principal Financial Group has a net margin of 1.89% compared to P10's net margin of -7.31%. P10's return on equity of 3.02% beat Principal Financial Group's return on equity of -1.82%.

P10 has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 14.56%. On the other hand Principal Financial Group has an analysts' consensus of $88.67 which suggests that it could grow by 14.56%. Given that Principal Financial Group has higher upside potential than P10, analysts believe Principal Financial Group is more attractive than P10.

P10 has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Principal Financial Group has a beta of 1.202, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.231%.

P10 has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.08%. Principal Financial Group offers a yield of 3.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.73 per share. P10 pays -215.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Principal Financial Group pays out 100.37% of its earnings as a dividend.

P10 quarterly revenues are $74.2M, which are smaller than Principal Financial Group quarterly revenues of $3B. P10's net income of $1.4M is higher than Principal Financial Group's net income of -$220M. Notably, P10's price-to-earnings ratio is 127.20x while Principal Financial Group's PE ratio is 14.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for P10 is 5.54x versus 1.30x for Principal Financial Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SEI Investments has a net margin of 1.89% compared to P10's net margin of 28.82%. P10's return on equity of 3.02% beat SEI Investments's return on equity of 24.65%.

P10 has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 14.56%. On the other hand SEI Investments has an analysts' consensus of $80.80 which suggests that it could fall by -2.77%. Given that P10 has higher upside potential than SEI Investments, analysts believe P10 is more attractive than SEI Investments.

P10 has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SEI Investments has a beta of 0.983, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.657%.

P10 has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.08%. SEI Investments offers a yield of 1.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share. P10 pays -215.98% of its earnings as a dividend. SEI Investments pays out 24.84% of its earnings as a dividend. SEI Investments's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

P10 quarterly revenues are $74.2M, which are smaller than SEI Investments quarterly revenues of $537.4M. P10's net income of $1.4M is lower than SEI Investments's net income of $154.9M. Notably, P10's price-to-earnings ratio is 127.20x while SEI Investments's PE ratio is 20.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for P10 is 5.54x versus 5.34x for SEI Investments. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.