Financhill
Buy
60

PWR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$274.31
Seasonality move :
8.98%
Day range:
$269.67 - $277.70
52-week range:
$227.08 - $365.88
Dividend yield:
0.14%
P/E ratio:
45.49x
P/S ratio:
1.74x
P/B ratio:
5.56x
Volume:
1.1M
Avg. volume:
1.7M
1-year change:
7.7%
Market cap:
$40.7B
Revenue:
$23.7B
EPS (TTM):
$6.03

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
PWR
Quanta Services
$5.9B $1.70 16.84% 119.68% $327.81
ECG
Everus Construction Group
$676.4M $0.43 -3.84% -43.76% $57.67
EME
EMCOR Group
$3.8B $4.63 11.41% 9.18% $486.60
FAST
Fastenal
$2B $0.52 7.47% 9.15% $76.11
IESC
IES Holdings
-- -- -- -- --
SVLT
Sunvault Energy
-- -- -- -- --
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
PWR
Quanta Services
$274.30 $327.81 $40.7B 45.49x $0.10 0.14% 1.74x
ECG
Everus Construction Group
$37.51 $57.67 $1.9B 12.63x $0.00 0% 0.67x
EME
EMCOR Group
$385.79 $486.60 $17.5B 17.91x $0.25 0.26% 1.24x
FAST
Fastenal
$81.30 $76.11 $46.6B 40.45x $0.43 1.97% 6.14x
IESC
IES Holdings
$188.78 -- $3.8B 17.58x $0.00 0% 1.28x
SVLT
Sunvault Energy
$0.0057 -- $792.5K -- $0.00 0% 0.17x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
PWR
Quanta Services
36.26% 1.160 8.92% 1.18x
ECG
Everus Construction Group
41.16% 0.000 8.82% 1.64x
EME
EMCOR Group
-- 1.489 -- 1.25x
FAST
Fastenal
5.14% 0.573 0.45% 1.92x
IESC
IES Holdings
-- 3.121 -- 1.43x
SVLT
Sunvault Energy
-- -0.951 -- --
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
PWR
Quanta Services
$1.1B $441.4M 8.39% 13.45% 7.21% $565M
ECG
Everus Construction Group
$86.3M $46M 22.15% 35.18% 6.21% $48.2M
EME
EMCOR Group
$757M $388.6M 37.22% 37.22% 11.27% $451.8M
FAST
Fastenal
$883.9M $393.9M 30.46% 32.3% 20.15% $206.5M
IESC
IES Holdings
$178M $75M 37.95% 37.95% 10.42% $24.1M
SVLT
Sunvault Energy
-- -- -- -- -- --

Quanta Services vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns PWR or ECG?

    Everus Construction Group has a net margin of 4.66% compared to Quanta Services's net margin of 4.54%. Quanta Services's return on equity of 13.45% beat Everus Construction Group's return on equity of 35.18%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    PWR
    Quanta Services
    16.23% $2.03 $11.5B
    ECG
    Everus Construction Group
    11.36% $0.67 $718.3M
  • What do Analysts Say About PWR or ECG?

    Quanta Services has a consensus price target of $327.81, signalling upside risk potential of 19.51%. On the other hand Everus Construction Group has an analysts' consensus of $57.67 which suggests that it could grow by 53.74%. Given that Everus Construction Group has higher upside potential than Quanta Services, analysts believe Everus Construction Group is more attractive than Quanta Services.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    PWR
    Quanta Services
    16 7 0
    ECG
    Everus Construction Group
    2 2 0
  • Is PWR or ECG More Risky?

    Quanta Services has a beta of 1.038, which suggesting that the stock is 3.809% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Everus Construction Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock PWR or ECG?

    Quanta Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.14%. Everus Construction Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Quanta Services pays 5.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Everus Construction Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Quanta Services's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios PWR or ECG?

    Quanta Services quarterly revenues are $6.6B, which are larger than Everus Construction Group quarterly revenues of $759.6M. Quanta Services's net income of $305.1M is higher than Everus Construction Group's net income of $34.5M. Notably, Quanta Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 45.49x while Everus Construction Group's PE ratio is 12.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Quanta Services is 1.74x versus 0.67x for Everus Construction Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    PWR
    Quanta Services
    1.74x 45.49x $6.6B $305.1M
    ECG
    Everus Construction Group
    0.67x 12.63x $759.6M $34.5M
  • Which has Higher Returns PWR or EME?

    EMCOR Group has a net margin of 4.66% compared to Quanta Services's net margin of 7.75%. Quanta Services's return on equity of 13.45% beat EMCOR Group's return on equity of 37.22%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    PWR
    Quanta Services
    16.23% $2.03 $11.5B
    EME
    EMCOR Group
    20.08% $6.32 $2.9B
  • What do Analysts Say About PWR or EME?

    Quanta Services has a consensus price target of $327.81, signalling upside risk potential of 19.51%. On the other hand EMCOR Group has an analysts' consensus of $486.60 which suggests that it could grow by 26.13%. Given that EMCOR Group has higher upside potential than Quanta Services, analysts believe EMCOR Group is more attractive than Quanta Services.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    PWR
    Quanta Services
    16 7 0
    EME
    EMCOR Group
    4 1 0
  • Is PWR or EME More Risky?

    Quanta Services has a beta of 1.038, which suggesting that the stock is 3.809% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EMCOR Group has a beta of 1.082, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.233%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock PWR or EME?

    Quanta Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.14%. EMCOR Group offers a yield of 0.26% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Quanta Services pays 5.99% of its earnings as a dividend. EMCOR Group pays out 4.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios PWR or EME?

    Quanta Services quarterly revenues are $6.6B, which are larger than EMCOR Group quarterly revenues of $3.8B. Quanta Services's net income of $305.1M is higher than EMCOR Group's net income of $292.2M. Notably, Quanta Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 45.49x while EMCOR Group's PE ratio is 17.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Quanta Services is 1.74x versus 1.24x for EMCOR Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    PWR
    Quanta Services
    1.74x 45.49x $6.6B $305.1M
    EME
    EMCOR Group
    1.24x 17.91x $3.8B $292.2M
  • Which has Higher Returns PWR or FAST?

    Fastenal has a net margin of 4.66% compared to Quanta Services's net margin of 15.25%. Quanta Services's return on equity of 13.45% beat Fastenal's return on equity of 32.3%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    PWR
    Quanta Services
    16.23% $2.03 $11.5B
    FAST
    Fastenal
    45.11% $0.52 $3.9B
  • What do Analysts Say About PWR or FAST?

    Quanta Services has a consensus price target of $327.81, signalling upside risk potential of 19.51%. On the other hand Fastenal has an analysts' consensus of $76.11 which suggests that it could fall by -6.38%. Given that Quanta Services has higher upside potential than Fastenal, analysts believe Quanta Services is more attractive than Fastenal.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    PWR
    Quanta Services
    16 7 0
    FAST
    Fastenal
    3 11 2
  • Is PWR or FAST More Risky?

    Quanta Services has a beta of 1.038, which suggesting that the stock is 3.809% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fastenal has a beta of 1.046, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.641%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock PWR or FAST?

    Quanta Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.14%. Fastenal offers a yield of 1.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share. Quanta Services pays 5.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Fastenal pays out 77.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios PWR or FAST?

    Quanta Services quarterly revenues are $6.6B, which are larger than Fastenal quarterly revenues of $2B. Quanta Services's net income of $305.1M is higher than Fastenal's net income of $298.7M. Notably, Quanta Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 45.49x while Fastenal's PE ratio is 40.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Quanta Services is 1.74x versus 6.14x for Fastenal. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    PWR
    Quanta Services
    1.74x 45.49x $6.6B $305.1M
    FAST
    Fastenal
    6.14x 40.45x $2B $298.7M
  • Which has Higher Returns PWR or IESC?

    IES Holdings has a net margin of 4.66% compared to Quanta Services's net margin of 7.51%. Quanta Services's return on equity of 13.45% beat IES Holdings's return on equity of 37.95%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    PWR
    Quanta Services
    16.23% $2.03 $11.5B
    IESC
    IES Holdings
    23.75% $2.72 $692.4M
  • What do Analysts Say About PWR or IESC?

    Quanta Services has a consensus price target of $327.81, signalling upside risk potential of 19.51%. On the other hand IES Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Quanta Services has higher upside potential than IES Holdings, analysts believe Quanta Services is more attractive than IES Holdings.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    PWR
    Quanta Services
    16 7 0
    IESC
    IES Holdings
    0 0 0
  • Is PWR or IESC More Risky?

    Quanta Services has a beta of 1.038, which suggesting that the stock is 3.809% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison IES Holdings has a beta of 1.507, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.702%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock PWR or IESC?

    Quanta Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.14%. IES Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Quanta Services pays 5.99% of its earnings as a dividend. IES Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Quanta Services's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios PWR or IESC?

    Quanta Services quarterly revenues are $6.6B, which are larger than IES Holdings quarterly revenues of $749.5M. Quanta Services's net income of $305.1M is higher than IES Holdings's net income of $56.3M. Notably, Quanta Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 45.49x while IES Holdings's PE ratio is 17.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Quanta Services is 1.74x versus 1.28x for IES Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    PWR
    Quanta Services
    1.74x 45.49x $6.6B $305.1M
    IESC
    IES Holdings
    1.28x 17.58x $749.5M $56.3M
  • Which has Higher Returns PWR or SVLT?

    Sunvault Energy has a net margin of 4.66% compared to Quanta Services's net margin of --. Quanta Services's return on equity of 13.45% beat Sunvault Energy's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    PWR
    Quanta Services
    16.23% $2.03 $11.5B
    SVLT
    Sunvault Energy
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About PWR or SVLT?

    Quanta Services has a consensus price target of $327.81, signalling upside risk potential of 19.51%. On the other hand Sunvault Energy has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Quanta Services has higher upside potential than Sunvault Energy, analysts believe Quanta Services is more attractive than Sunvault Energy.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    PWR
    Quanta Services
    16 7 0
    SVLT
    Sunvault Energy
    0 0 0
  • Is PWR or SVLT More Risky?

    Quanta Services has a beta of 1.038, which suggesting that the stock is 3.809% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sunvault Energy has a beta of 0.783, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.662%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock PWR or SVLT?

    Quanta Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.14%. Sunvault Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Quanta Services pays 5.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Sunvault Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Quanta Services's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios PWR or SVLT?

    Quanta Services quarterly revenues are $6.6B, which are larger than Sunvault Energy quarterly revenues of --. Quanta Services's net income of $305.1M is higher than Sunvault Energy's net income of --. Notably, Quanta Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 45.49x while Sunvault Energy's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Quanta Services is 1.74x versus 0.17x for Sunvault Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    PWR
    Quanta Services
    1.74x 45.49x $6.6B $305.1M
    SVLT
    Sunvault Energy
    0.17x -- -- --

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Will NVIDIA Stock Bounce Back?
Will NVIDIA Stock Bounce Back?

After the wild market moves during February and March, investors…

Is Energy Transfer a Good Dividend Stock to Buy Now?
Is Energy Transfer a Good Dividend Stock to Buy Now?

Energy Transfer (NYSE:ET) offers an impressive yield, to say the…

Did the Market Bottom Already?
Did the Market Bottom Already?

The past few weeks have been among the most volatile…

Stock Ideas

Buy
53
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3T
P/E Ratio: 33x

Buy
54
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 33x

Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $2.7T
P/E Ratio: 38x

Alerts

Buy
78
BMA alert for Apr 15

Banco Macro SA [BMA] is down 1.92% over the past day.

Buy
72
BKTI alert for Apr 15

BK Technologies [BKTI] is down 0.9% over the past day.

Buy
71
GGAL alert for Apr 15

Grupo Financiero Galicia SA [GGAL] is down 0.73% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock