PEG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Exelon has a net margin of 19.68% compared to Public Service Enterprise Group's net margin of 11.49%. Public Service Enterprise Group's return on equity of 12.98% beat Exelon's return on equity of 9.34%.

Public Service Enterprise Group has a consensus price target of $89.01, signalling upside risk potential of 4.64%. On the other hand Exelon has an analysts' consensus of $42.73 which suggests that it could grow by 15.41%. Given that Exelon has higher upside potential than Public Service Enterprise Group, analysts believe Exelon is more attractive than Public Service Enterprise Group.

Public Service Enterprise Group has a beta of 0.627, which suggesting that the stock is 37.333% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Exelon has a beta of 0.544, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.588%.

Public Service Enterprise Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.82%. Exelon offers a yield of 4.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. Public Service Enterprise Group pays 44.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Exelon pays out 61.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Public Service Enterprise Group quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are smaller than Exelon quarterly revenues of $6.2B. Public Service Enterprise Group's net income of $520M is lower than Exelon's net income of $707M. Notably, Public Service Enterprise Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.94x while Exelon's PE ratio is 15.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Public Service Enterprise Group is 4.08x versus 1.62x for Exelon. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NRG Energy has a net margin of 19.68% compared to Public Service Enterprise Group's net margin of -10.62%. Public Service Enterprise Group's return on equity of 12.98% beat NRG Energy's return on equity of 30.38%.

Public Service Enterprise Group has a consensus price target of $89.01, signalling upside risk potential of 4.64%. On the other hand NRG Energy has an analysts' consensus of $98.64 which suggests that it could grow by 9.06%. Given that NRG Energy has higher upside potential than Public Service Enterprise Group, analysts believe NRG Energy is more attractive than Public Service Enterprise Group.

Public Service Enterprise Group has a beta of 0.627, which suggesting that the stock is 37.333% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NRG Energy has a beta of 1.122, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.152%.

Public Service Enterprise Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.82%. NRG Energy offers a yield of 1.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share. Public Service Enterprise Group pays 44.36% of its earnings as a dividend. NRG Energy pays out -188.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Public Service Enterprise Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Public Service Enterprise Group quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are smaller than NRG Energy quarterly revenues of $7.2B. Public Service Enterprise Group's net income of $520M is higher than NRG Energy's net income of -$767M. Notably, Public Service Enterprise Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.94x while NRG Energy's PE ratio is 23.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Public Service Enterprise Group is 4.08x versus 0.69x for NRG Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Southern has a net margin of 19.68% compared to Public Service Enterprise Group's net margin of 21.1%. Public Service Enterprise Group's return on equity of 12.98% beat Southern's return on equity of 13.18%.

Public Service Enterprise Group has a consensus price target of $89.01, signalling upside risk potential of 4.64%. On the other hand Southern has an analysts' consensus of $91.33 which suggests that it could grow by 10.22%. Given that Southern has higher upside potential than Public Service Enterprise Group, analysts believe Southern is more attractive than Public Service Enterprise Group.

Public Service Enterprise Group has a beta of 0.627, which suggesting that the stock is 37.333% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Southern has a beta of 0.507, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.333%.

Public Service Enterprise Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.82%. Southern offers a yield of 3.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.72 per share. Public Service Enterprise Group pays 44.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Southern pays out 76.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Public Service Enterprise Group quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are smaller than Southern quarterly revenues of $7.3B. Public Service Enterprise Group's net income of $520M is lower than Southern's net income of $1.5B. Notably, Public Service Enterprise Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.94x while Southern's PE ratio is 19.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Public Service Enterprise Group is 4.08x versus 3.45x for Southern. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vistra has a net margin of 19.68% compared to Public Service Enterprise Group's net margin of 30.03%. Public Service Enterprise Group's return on equity of 12.98% beat Vistra's return on equity of --.

Public Service Enterprise Group has a consensus price target of $89.01, signalling upside risk potential of 4.64%. On the other hand Vistra has an analysts' consensus of $160.46 which suggests that it could grow by 14.66%. Given that Vistra has higher upside potential than Public Service Enterprise Group, analysts believe Vistra is more attractive than Public Service Enterprise Group.

Public Service Enterprise Group has a beta of 0.627, which suggesting that the stock is 37.333% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vistra has a beta of 1.160, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.026%.

Public Service Enterprise Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.82%. Vistra offers a yield of 0.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. Public Service Enterprise Group pays 44.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Vistra pays out 31.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Public Service Enterprise Group quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are smaller than Vistra quarterly revenues of $6.3B. Public Service Enterprise Group's net income of $520M is lower than Vistra's net income of $1.9B. Notably, Public Service Enterprise Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.94x while Vistra's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Public Service Enterprise Group is 4.08x versus -- for Vistra. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.