ORCL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Asana has a net margin of 20.78% compared to Oracle's net margin of -33.08%. Oracle's return on equity of 104.49% beat Asana's return on equity of -90.94%.

Oracle has a consensus price target of $186.16, signalling upside risk potential of 20.94%. On the other hand Asana has an analysts' consensus of $15.61 which suggests that it could grow by 1.44%. Given that Oracle has higher upside potential than Asana, analysts believe Oracle is more attractive than Asana.

Oracle has a beta of 1.071, which suggesting that the stock is 7.149% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Asana has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Oracle has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.04%. Asana offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Oracle pays 41.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Asana pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oracle's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Oracle quarterly revenues are $14.1B, which are larger than Asana quarterly revenues of $188.3M. Oracle's net income of $2.9B is higher than Asana's net income of -$62.3M. Notably, Oracle's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.13x while Asana's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oracle is 7.88x versus 4.88x for Asana. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Salesforce has a net margin of 20.78% compared to Oracle's net margin of 17.09%. Oracle's return on equity of 104.49% beat Salesforce's return on equity of 10.45%.

Oracle has a consensus price target of $186.16, signalling upside risk potential of 20.94%. On the other hand Salesforce has an analysts' consensus of $375.36 which suggests that it could grow by 30.06%. Given that Salesforce has higher upside potential than Oracle, analysts believe Salesforce is more attractive than Oracle.

Oracle has a beta of 1.071, which suggesting that the stock is 7.149% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Salesforce has a beta of 1.353, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.323%.

Oracle has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.04%. Salesforce offers a yield of 0.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Oracle pays 41.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Salesforce pays out 24.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Oracle quarterly revenues are $14.1B, which are larger than Salesforce quarterly revenues of $10B. Oracle's net income of $2.9B is higher than Salesforce's net income of $1.7B. Notably, Oracle's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.13x while Salesforce's PE ratio is 45.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oracle is 7.88x versus 7.41x for Salesforce. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Microsoft has a net margin of 20.78% compared to Oracle's net margin of 34.62%. Oracle's return on equity of 104.49% beat Microsoft's return on equity of 34.34%.

Oracle has a consensus price target of $186.16, signalling upside risk potential of 20.94%. On the other hand Microsoft has an analysts' consensus of $506.24 which suggests that it could grow by 28.11%. Given that Microsoft has higher upside potential than Oracle, analysts believe Microsoft is more attractive than Oracle.

Oracle has a beta of 1.071, which suggesting that the stock is 7.149% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Microsoft has a beta of 0.918, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.215%.

Oracle has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.04%. Microsoft offers a yield of 0.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Oracle pays 41.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft pays out 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Oracle quarterly revenues are $14.1B, which are smaller than Microsoft quarterly revenues of $69.6B. Oracle's net income of $2.9B is lower than Microsoft's net income of $24.1B. Notably, Oracle's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.13x while Microsoft's PE ratio is 31.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oracle is 7.88x versus 11.28x for Microsoft. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Snowflake has a net margin of 20.78% compared to Oracle's net margin of -33.19%. Oracle's return on equity of 104.49% beat Snowflake's return on equity of -32.41%.

Oracle has a consensus price target of $186.16, signalling upside risk potential of 20.94%. On the other hand Snowflake has an analysts' consensus of $206.08 which suggests that it could grow by 26.56%. Given that Snowflake has higher upside potential than Oracle, analysts believe Snowflake is more attractive than Oracle.

Oracle has a beta of 1.071, which suggesting that the stock is 7.149% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Snowflake has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Oracle has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.04%. Snowflake offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Oracle pays 41.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Snowflake pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oracle's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Oracle quarterly revenues are $14.1B, which are larger than Snowflake quarterly revenues of $986.8M. Oracle's net income of $2.9B is higher than Snowflake's net income of -$327.5M. Notably, Oracle's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.13x while Snowflake's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oracle is 7.88x versus 14.94x for Snowflake. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.