NRG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CenterPoint Energy has a net margin of 9.43% compared to NRG Energy's net margin of 10.96%. NRG Energy's return on equity of 37.95% beat CenterPoint Energy's return on equity of 9.95%.

NRG Energy has a consensus price target of $113.90, signalling upside risk potential of 16.11%. On the other hand CenterPoint Energy has an analysts' consensus of $35.74 which suggests that it could fall by -2.82%. Given that NRG Energy has higher upside potential than CenterPoint Energy, analysts believe NRG Energy is more attractive than CenterPoint Energy.

NRG Energy has a beta of 1.105, which suggesting that the stock is 10.525% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CenterPoint Energy has a beta of 0.647, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.326%.

NRG Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.7%. CenterPoint Energy offers a yield of 2.26% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. NRG Energy pays 36% of its earnings as a dividend. CenterPoint Energy pays out 51.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

NRG Energy quarterly revenues are $6.8B, which are larger than CenterPoint Energy quarterly revenues of $2.3B. NRG Energy's net income of $643M is higher than CenterPoint Energy's net income of $248M. Notably, NRG Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.18x while CenterPoint Energy's PE ratio is 23.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NRG Energy is 0.74x versus 2.74x for CenterPoint Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Duke Energy has a net margin of 9.43% compared to NRG Energy's net margin of 16.37%. NRG Energy's return on equity of 37.95% beat Duke Energy's return on equity of 8.94%.

NRG Energy has a consensus price target of $113.90, signalling upside risk potential of 16.11%. On the other hand Duke Energy has an analysts' consensus of $124.33 which suggests that it could grow by 3.31%. Given that NRG Energy has higher upside potential than Duke Energy, analysts believe NRG Energy is more attractive than Duke Energy.

NRG Energy has a beta of 1.105, which suggesting that the stock is 10.525% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Duke Energy has a beta of 0.387, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.348%.

NRG Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.7%. Duke Energy offers a yield of 3.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.05 per share. NRG Energy pays 36% of its earnings as a dividend. Duke Energy pays out 71.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

NRG Energy quarterly revenues are $6.8B, which are smaller than Duke Energy quarterly revenues of $7.4B. NRG Energy's net income of $643M is lower than Duke Energy's net income of $1.2B. Notably, NRG Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.18x while Duke Energy's PE ratio is 21.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NRG Energy is 0.74x versus 3.06x for Duke Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

GE Vernova has a net margin of 9.43% compared to NRG Energy's net margin of 4.58%. NRG Energy's return on equity of 37.95% beat GE Vernova's return on equity of 15.67%.

NRG Energy has a consensus price target of $113.90, signalling upside risk potential of 16.11%. On the other hand GE Vernova has an analysts' consensus of $395.79 which suggests that it could grow by 20.61%. Given that GE Vernova has higher upside potential than NRG Energy, analysts believe GE Vernova is more attractive than NRG Energy.

NRG Energy has a beta of 1.105, which suggesting that the stock is 10.525% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GE Vernova has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

NRG Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.7%. GE Vernova offers a yield of 0.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. NRG Energy pays 36% of its earnings as a dividend. GE Vernova pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. NRG Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

NRG Energy quarterly revenues are $6.8B, which are smaller than GE Vernova quarterly revenues of $10.6B. NRG Energy's net income of $643M is higher than GE Vernova's net income of $484M. Notably, NRG Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.18x while GE Vernova's PE ratio is 59.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NRG Energy is 0.74x versus 2.60x for GE Vernova. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vistra has a net margin of 9.43% compared to NRG Energy's net margin of 10.92%. NRG Energy's return on equity of 37.95% beat Vistra's return on equity of 38.93%.

NRG Energy has a consensus price target of $113.90, signalling upside risk potential of 16.11%. On the other hand Vistra has an analysts' consensus of $167.67 which suggests that it could grow by 44.7%. Given that Vistra has higher upside potential than NRG Energy, analysts believe Vistra is more attractive than NRG Energy.

NRG Energy has a beta of 1.105, which suggesting that the stock is 10.525% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vistra has a beta of 1.216, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.619%.

NRG Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.7%. Vistra offers a yield of 0.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. NRG Energy pays 36% of its earnings as a dividend. Vistra pays out 17.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

NRG Energy quarterly revenues are $6.8B, which are larger than Vistra quarterly revenues of $4B. NRG Energy's net income of $643M is higher than Vistra's net income of $441M. Notably, NRG Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.18x while Vistra's PE ratio is 16.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NRG Energy is 0.74x versus 2.36x for Vistra. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.