NKE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Deckers Outdoor has a net margin of 7.05% compared to Nike's net margin of 25%. Nike's return on equity of 31.91% beat Deckers Outdoor's return on equity of 42.29%.

Nike has a consensus price target of $77.64, signalling upside risk potential of 44.99%. On the other hand Deckers Outdoor has an analysts' consensus of $189.99 which suggests that it could grow by 84.42%. Given that Deckers Outdoor has higher upside potential than Nike, analysts believe Deckers Outdoor is more attractive than Nike.

Nike has a beta of 1.147, which suggesting that the stock is 14.681% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Deckers Outdoor has a beta of 1.068, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.83%.

Nike has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.88%. Deckers Outdoor offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nike pays 38.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Deckers Outdoor pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nike's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Nike quarterly revenues are $11.3B, which are larger than Deckers Outdoor quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Nike's net income of $794M is higher than Deckers Outdoor's net income of $456.7M. Notably, Nike's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.79x while Deckers Outdoor's PE ratio is 16.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nike is 1.68x versus 3.21x for Deckers Outdoor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Steven Madden has a net margin of 7.05% compared to Nike's net margin of 5.98%. Nike's return on equity of 31.91% beat Steven Madden's return on equity of 19.88%.

Nike has a consensus price target of $77.64, signalling upside risk potential of 44.99%. On the other hand Steven Madden has an analysts' consensus of $34.78 which suggests that it could grow by 77.98%. Given that Steven Madden has higher upside potential than Nike, analysts believe Steven Madden is more attractive than Nike.

Nike has a beta of 1.147, which suggesting that the stock is 14.681% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Steven Madden has a beta of 0.979, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.131%.

Nike has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.88%. Steven Madden offers a yield of 4.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. Nike pays 38.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Steven Madden pays out 36.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Nike quarterly revenues are $11.3B, which are larger than Steven Madden quarterly revenues of $582.3M. Nike's net income of $794M is higher than Steven Madden's net income of $34.8M. Notably, Nike's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.79x while Steven Madden's PE ratio is 8.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nike is 1.68x versus 0.62x for Steven Madden. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Skechers USA has a net margin of 7.05% compared to Nike's net margin of 4.49%. Nike's return on equity of 31.91% beat Skechers USA's return on equity of 13.73%.

Nike has a consensus price target of $77.64, signalling upside risk potential of 44.99%. On the other hand Skechers USA has an analysts' consensus of $71.27 which suggests that it could grow by 55.15%. Given that Skechers USA has higher upside potential than Nike, analysts believe Skechers USA is more attractive than Nike.

Nike has a beta of 1.147, which suggesting that the stock is 14.681% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Skechers USA has a beta of 1.082, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.179%.

Nike has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.88%. Skechers USA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nike pays 38.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Skechers USA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nike's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Nike quarterly revenues are $11.3B, which are larger than Skechers USA quarterly revenues of $2.2B. Nike's net income of $794M is higher than Skechers USA's net income of $99.3M. Notably, Nike's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.79x while Skechers USA's PE ratio is 11.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nike is 1.68x versus 0.80x for Skechers USA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Wolverine World Wide has a net margin of 7.05% compared to Nike's net margin of 4.97%. Nike's return on equity of 31.91% beat Wolverine World Wide's return on equity of 16.59%.

Nike has a consensus price target of $77.64, signalling upside risk potential of 44.99%. On the other hand Wolverine World Wide has an analysts' consensus of $19.67 which suggests that it could grow by 86.59%. Given that Wolverine World Wide has higher upside potential than Nike, analysts believe Wolverine World Wide is more attractive than Nike.

Nike has a beta of 1.147, which suggesting that the stock is 14.681% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wolverine World Wide has a beta of 1.738, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.751%.

Nike has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.88%. Wolverine World Wide offers a yield of 3.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Nike pays 38.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Wolverine World Wide pays out 67.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Nike quarterly revenues are $11.3B, which are larger than Wolverine World Wide quarterly revenues of $494.7M. Nike's net income of $794M is higher than Wolverine World Wide's net income of $24.6M. Notably, Nike's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.79x while Wolverine World Wide's PE ratio is 19.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nike is 1.68x versus 0.48x for Wolverine World Wide. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.