NAVI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP has a net margin of -1.13% compared to Navient's net margin of -1816.14%. Navient's return on equity of 2.85% beat Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP's return on equity of 4.22%.

Navient has a consensus price target of $14.56, signalling upside risk potential of 10.86%. On the other hand Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 52.83%. Given that Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP has higher upside potential than Navient, analysts believe Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP is more attractive than Navient.

Navient has a beta of 1.434, which suggesting that the stock is 43.405% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP has a beta of 0.708, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.151%.

Navient has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.87%. Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP offers a yield of 13.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share. Navient pays 34.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP pays out 78.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Navient quarterly revenues are $177M, which are larger than Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP quarterly revenues of $255.3K. Navient's net income of -$2M is higher than Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP's net income of -$4.6M. Notably, Navient's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.03x while Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP's PE ratio is 17.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Navient is 1.57x versus 6.87x for Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

LM Funding America has a net margin of -1.13% compared to Navient's net margin of -490.99%. Navient's return on equity of 2.85% beat LM Funding America's return on equity of -32.38%.

Navient has a consensus price target of $14.56, signalling upside risk potential of 10.86%. On the other hand LM Funding America has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 151.05%. Given that LM Funding America has higher upside potential than Navient, analysts believe LM Funding America is more attractive than Navient.

Navient has a beta of 1.434, which suggesting that the stock is 43.405% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LM Funding America has a beta of 1.426, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.557%.

Navient has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.87%. LM Funding America offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Navient pays 34.21% of its earnings as a dividend. LM Funding America pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Navient's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Navient quarterly revenues are $177M, which are larger than LM Funding America quarterly revenues of $956.9K. Navient's net income of -$2M is higher than LM Funding America's net income of -$4.7M. Notably, Navient's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.03x while LM Funding America's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Navient is 1.57x versus 0.36x for LM Funding America. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PayPal Holdings has a net margin of -1.13% compared to Navient's net margin of 12.87%. Navient's return on equity of 2.85% beat PayPal Holdings's return on equity of 21.65%.

Navient has a consensus price target of $14.56, signalling upside risk potential of 10.86%. On the other hand PayPal Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $92.61 which suggests that it could grow by 6.96%. Given that Navient has higher upside potential than PayPal Holdings, analysts believe Navient is more attractive than PayPal Holdings.

Navient has a beta of 1.434, which suggesting that the stock is 43.405% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PayPal Holdings has a beta of 1.435, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.541%.

Navient has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.87%. PayPal Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Navient pays 34.21% of its earnings as a dividend. PayPal Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Navient's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Navient quarterly revenues are $177M, which are smaller than PayPal Holdings quarterly revenues of $7.8B. Navient's net income of -$2M is lower than PayPal Holdings's net income of $1B. Notably, Navient's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.03x while PayPal Holdings's PE ratio is 20.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Navient is 1.57x versus 2.94x for PayPal Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WTB Financial A has a net margin of -1.13% compared to Navient's net margin of 13.76%. Navient's return on equity of 2.85% beat WTB Financial A's return on equity of 5.07%.

Navient has a consensus price target of $14.56, signalling upside risk potential of 10.86%. On the other hand WTB Financial A has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Navient has higher upside potential than WTB Financial A, analysts believe Navient is more attractive than WTB Financial A.

Navient has a beta of 1.434, which suggesting that the stock is 43.405% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WTB Financial A has a beta of 0.187, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 81.265%.

Navient has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.87%. WTB Financial A offers a yield of 1.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.85 per share. Navient pays 34.21% of its earnings as a dividend. WTB Financial A pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Navient's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Navient quarterly revenues are $177M, which are larger than WTB Financial A quarterly revenues of $86.1M. Navient's net income of -$2M is lower than WTB Financial A's net income of $11.9M. Notably, Navient's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.03x while WTB Financial A's PE ratio is 27.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Navient is 1.57x versus 3.64x for WTB Financial A. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.