LNC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Abacus Life has a net margin of -12.58% compared to Lincoln National's net margin of -18.21%. Lincoln National's return on equity of 5.12% beat Abacus Life's return on equity of -5.9%.

Lincoln National has a consensus price target of $36.09, signalling upside risk potential of 16.42%. On the other hand Abacus Life has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 86.45%. Given that Abacus Life has higher upside potential than Lincoln National, analysts believe Abacus Life is more attractive than Lincoln National.

Lincoln National has a beta of 1.774, which suggesting that the stock is 77.395% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Abacus Life has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Lincoln National has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.81%. Abacus Life offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lincoln National pays -51.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Abacus Life pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lincoln National quarterly revenues are $4.2B, which are larger than Abacus Life quarterly revenues of $28.1M. Lincoln National's net income of -$528M is lower than Abacus Life's net income of -$5.1M. Notably, Lincoln National's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.14x while Abacus Life's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lincoln National is 0.39x versus 5.12x for Abacus Life. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Brighthouse Financial has a net margin of -12.58% compared to Lincoln National's net margin of 8.97%. Lincoln National's return on equity of 5.12% beat Brighthouse Financial's return on equity of -25.86%.

Lincoln National has a consensus price target of $36.09, signalling upside risk potential of 16.42%. On the other hand Brighthouse Financial has an analysts' consensus of $52.25 which suggests that it could grow by 8.79%. Given that Lincoln National has higher upside potential than Brighthouse Financial, analysts believe Lincoln National is more attractive than Brighthouse Financial.

Lincoln National has a beta of 1.774, which suggesting that the stock is 77.395% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Brighthouse Financial has a beta of 1.058, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.798%.

Lincoln National has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.81%. Brighthouse Financial offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lincoln National pays -51.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Brighthouse Financial pays out -9.17% of its earnings as a dividend.

Lincoln National quarterly revenues are $4.2B, which are larger than Brighthouse Financial quarterly revenues of $2B. Lincoln National's net income of -$528M is lower than Brighthouse Financial's net income of $176M. Notably, Lincoln National's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.14x while Brighthouse Financial's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lincoln National is 0.39x versus -- for Brighthouse Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Citizens has a net margin of -12.58% compared to Lincoln National's net margin of 4.52%. Lincoln National's return on equity of 5.12% beat Citizens's return on equity of 11.99%.

Lincoln National has a consensus price target of $36.09, signalling upside risk potential of 16.42%. On the other hand Citizens has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 25%. Given that Citizens has higher upside potential than Lincoln National, analysts believe Citizens is more attractive than Lincoln National.

Lincoln National has a beta of 1.774, which suggesting that the stock is 77.395% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Citizens has a beta of 0.090, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 91.012%.

Lincoln National has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.81%. Citizens offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lincoln National pays -51.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Citizens pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lincoln National quarterly revenues are $4.2B, which are larger than Citizens quarterly revenues of $61.7M. Lincoln National's net income of -$528M is lower than Citizens's net income of $2.8M. Notably, Lincoln National's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.14x while Citizens's PE ratio is 9.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lincoln National is 0.39x versus 0.82x for Citizens. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MetLife has a net margin of -12.58% compared to Lincoln National's net margin of 7.35%. Lincoln National's return on equity of 5.12% beat MetLife's return on equity of 13.1%.

Lincoln National has a consensus price target of $36.09, signalling upside risk potential of 16.42%. On the other hand MetLife has an analysts' consensus of $92.54 which suggests that it could grow by 13.74%. Given that Lincoln National has higher upside potential than MetLife, analysts believe Lincoln National is more attractive than MetLife.

Lincoln National has a beta of 1.774, which suggesting that the stock is 77.395% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MetLife has a beta of 1.065, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.465%.

Lincoln National has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.81%. MetLife offers a yield of 2.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share. Lincoln National pays -51.46% of its earnings as a dividend. MetLife pays out 111.79% of its earnings as a dividend.

Lincoln National quarterly revenues are $4.2B, which are smaller than MetLife quarterly revenues of $18.3B. Lincoln National's net income of -$528M is lower than MetLife's net income of $1.3B. Notably, Lincoln National's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.14x while MetLife's PE ratio is 16.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lincoln National is 0.39x versus 0.83x for MetLife. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.