IBM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Ibotta has a net margin of 16.6% compared to International Business Machines's net margin of 77.43%. International Business Machines's return on equity of 24.69% beat Ibotta's return on equity of 27.13%.

International Business Machines has a consensus price target of $254.51, signalling upside risk potential of 4.31%. On the other hand Ibotta has an analysts' consensus of $51.00 which suggests that it could grow by 19.33%. Given that Ibotta has higher upside potential than International Business Machines, analysts believe Ibotta is more attractive than International Business Machines.

International Business Machines has a beta of 0.745, which suggesting that the stock is 25.546% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ibotta has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

International Business Machines has a quarterly dividend of $1.67 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.74%. Ibotta offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. International Business Machines pays 102.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Ibotta pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

International Business Machines quarterly revenues are $17.6B, which are larger than Ibotta quarterly revenues of $98.4M. International Business Machines's net income of $2.9B is higher than Ibotta's net income of $76.2M. Notably, International Business Machines's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.07x while Ibotta's PE ratio is 24.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for International Business Machines is 3.63x versus 3.50x for Ibotta. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Leidos Holdings has a net margin of 16.6% compared to International Business Machines's net margin of 6.51%. International Business Machines's return on equity of 24.69% beat Leidos Holdings's return on equity of 28.23%.

International Business Machines has a consensus price target of $254.51, signalling upside risk potential of 4.31%. On the other hand Leidos Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $171.87 which suggests that it could grow by 28.21%. Given that Leidos Holdings has higher upside potential than International Business Machines, analysts believe Leidos Holdings is more attractive than International Business Machines.

International Business Machines has a beta of 0.745, which suggesting that the stock is 25.546% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Leidos Holdings has a beta of 0.717, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.334%.

International Business Machines has a quarterly dividend of $1.67 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.74%. Leidos Holdings offers a yield of 1.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. International Business Machines pays 102.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Leidos Holdings pays out 16.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Leidos Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but International Business Machines's is not.

International Business Machines quarterly revenues are $17.6B, which are larger than Leidos Holdings quarterly revenues of $4.4B. International Business Machines's net income of $2.9B is higher than Leidos Holdings's net income of $284M. Notably, International Business Machines's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.07x while Leidos Holdings's PE ratio is 14.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for International Business Machines is 3.63x versus 1.10x for Leidos Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MongoDB has a net margin of 16.6% compared to International Business Machines's net margin of 2.89%. International Business Machines's return on equity of 24.69% beat MongoDB's return on equity of -8.08%.

International Business Machines has a consensus price target of $254.51, signalling upside risk potential of 4.31%. On the other hand MongoDB has an analysts' consensus of $302.92 which suggests that it could grow by 70.15%. Given that MongoDB has higher upside potential than International Business Machines, analysts believe MongoDB is more attractive than International Business Machines.

International Business Machines has a beta of 0.745, which suggesting that the stock is 25.546% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MongoDB has a beta of 1.297, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.701%.

International Business Machines has a quarterly dividend of $1.67 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.74%. MongoDB offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. International Business Machines pays 102.06% of its earnings as a dividend. MongoDB pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

International Business Machines quarterly revenues are $17.6B, which are larger than MongoDB quarterly revenues of $548.4M. International Business Machines's net income of $2.9B is higher than MongoDB's net income of $15.8M. Notably, International Business Machines's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.07x while MongoDB's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for International Business Machines is 3.63x versus 6.68x for MongoDB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Palantir Technologies has a net margin of 16.6% compared to International Business Machines's net margin of 9.55%. International Business Machines's return on equity of 24.69% beat Palantir Technologies's return on equity of 10.88%.

International Business Machines has a consensus price target of $254.51, signalling upside risk potential of 4.31%. On the other hand Palantir Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $86.61 which suggests that it could grow by 0.89%. Given that International Business Machines has higher upside potential than Palantir Technologies, analysts believe International Business Machines is more attractive than Palantir Technologies.

International Business Machines has a beta of 0.745, which suggesting that the stock is 25.546% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Palantir Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

International Business Machines has a quarterly dividend of $1.67 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.74%. Palantir Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. International Business Machines pays 102.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Palantir Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

International Business Machines quarterly revenues are $17.6B, which are larger than Palantir Technologies quarterly revenues of $827.5M. International Business Machines's net income of $2.9B is higher than Palantir Technologies's net income of $79M. Notably, International Business Machines's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.07x while Palantir Technologies's PE ratio is 451.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for International Business Machines is 3.63x versus 73.42x for Palantir Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.