HOG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Luminar Technologies has a net margin of -17% compared to Harley-Davidson's net margin of -196.68%. Harley-Davidson's return on equity of 13.71% beat Luminar Technologies's return on equity of --.

Harley-Davidson has a consensus price target of $30.11, signalling upside risk potential of 44.63%. On the other hand Luminar Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $22.40 which suggests that it could grow by 384.85%. Given that Luminar Technologies has higher upside potential than Harley-Davidson, analysts believe Luminar Technologies is more attractive than Harley-Davidson.

Harley-Davidson has a beta of 1.283, which suggesting that the stock is 28.296% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Luminar Technologies has a beta of 1.865, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 86.529%.

Harley-Davidson has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.35%. Luminar Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Harley-Davidson pays 20.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Luminar Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Harley-Davidson's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Harley-Davidson quarterly revenues are $687.6M, which are larger than Luminar Technologies quarterly revenues of $22.5M. Harley-Davidson's net income of -$116.9M is lower than Luminar Technologies's net income of -$44.2M. Notably, Harley-Davidson's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.25x while Luminar Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Harley-Davidson is 0.53x versus 1.94x for Luminar Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Malibu Boats has a net margin of -17% compared to Harley-Davidson's net margin of 1.18%. Harley-Davidson's return on equity of 13.71% beat Malibu Boats's return on equity of -16.06%.

Harley-Davidson has a consensus price target of $30.11, signalling upside risk potential of 44.63%. On the other hand Malibu Boats has an analysts' consensus of $41.14 which suggests that it could grow by 63.46%. Given that Malibu Boats has higher upside potential than Harley-Davidson, analysts believe Malibu Boats is more attractive than Harley-Davidson.

Harley-Davidson has a beta of 1.283, which suggesting that the stock is 28.296% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Malibu Boats has a beta of 1.266, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.623%.

Harley-Davidson has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.35%. Malibu Boats offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Harley-Davidson pays 20.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Malibu Boats pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Harley-Davidson's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Harley-Davidson quarterly revenues are $687.6M, which are larger than Malibu Boats quarterly revenues of $200.3M. Harley-Davidson's net income of -$116.9M is lower than Malibu Boats's net income of $2.4M. Notably, Harley-Davidson's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.25x while Malibu Boats's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Harley-Davidson is 0.53x versus 0.69x for Malibu Boats. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Polaris has a net margin of -17% compared to Harley-Davidson's net margin of 0.6%. Harley-Davidson's return on equity of 13.71% beat Polaris's return on equity of 8.17%.

Harley-Davidson has a consensus price target of $30.11, signalling upside risk potential of 44.63%. On the other hand Polaris has an analysts' consensus of $47.58 which suggests that it could grow by 48.84%. Given that Polaris has higher upside potential than Harley-Davidson, analysts believe Polaris is more attractive than Harley-Davidson.

Harley-Davidson has a beta of 1.283, which suggesting that the stock is 28.296% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Polaris has a beta of 1.318, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.843%.

Harley-Davidson has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.35%. Polaris offers a yield of 8.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.67 per share. Harley-Davidson pays 20.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Polaris pays out 133.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Harley-Davidson's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Polaris's is not.

Harley-Davidson quarterly revenues are $687.6M, which are smaller than Polaris quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Harley-Davidson's net income of -$116.9M is lower than Polaris's net income of $10.6M. Notably, Harley-Davidson's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.25x while Polaris's PE ratio is 16.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Harley-Davidson is 0.53x versus 0.25x for Polaris. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Worksport has a net margin of -17% compared to Harley-Davidson's net margin of -132.43%. Harley-Davidson's return on equity of 13.71% beat Worksport's return on equity of -87.2%.

Harley-Davidson has a consensus price target of $30.11, signalling upside risk potential of 44.63%. On the other hand Worksport has an analysts' consensus of $11.00 which suggests that it could grow by 280.62%. Given that Worksport has higher upside potential than Harley-Davidson, analysts believe Worksport is more attractive than Harley-Davidson.

Harley-Davidson has a beta of 1.283, which suggesting that the stock is 28.296% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Worksport has a beta of 2.074, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 107.355%.

Harley-Davidson has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.35%. Worksport offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Harley-Davidson pays 20.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Worksport pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Harley-Davidson's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Harley-Davidson quarterly revenues are $687.6M, which are larger than Worksport quarterly revenues of $3.1M. Harley-Davidson's net income of -$116.9M is lower than Worksport's net income of -$4.1M. Notably, Harley-Davidson's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.25x while Worksport's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Harley-Davidson is 0.53x versus 0.94x for Worksport. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.