DNB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Intercontinental Exchange has a net margin of 0.53% compared to Dun & Bradstreet Holdings's net margin of 21.66%. Dun & Bradstreet Holdings's return on equity of -1.03% beat Intercontinental Exchange's return on equity of 9.23%.

Dun & Bradstreet Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 16.26%. On the other hand Intercontinental Exchange has an analysts' consensus of $183.50 which suggests that it could grow by 22.08%. Given that Intercontinental Exchange has higher upside potential than Dun & Bradstreet Holdings, analysts believe Intercontinental Exchange is more attractive than Dun & Bradstreet Holdings.

Dun & Bradstreet Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intercontinental Exchange has a beta of 1.082, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.177%.

Dun & Bradstreet Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.62%. Intercontinental Exchange offers a yield of 1.2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Dun & Bradstreet Holdings pays -183.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Intercontinental Exchange pays out 40.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Intercontinental Exchange's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Dun & Bradstreet Holdings quarterly revenues are $609.1M, which are smaller than Intercontinental Exchange quarterly revenues of $3B. Dun & Bradstreet Holdings's net income of $3.2M is lower than Intercontinental Exchange's net income of $657M. Notably, Dun & Bradstreet Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Intercontinental Exchange's PE ratio is 35.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dun & Bradstreet Holdings is 2.25x versus 7.59x for Intercontinental Exchange. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Morningstar has a net margin of 0.53% compared to Dun & Bradstreet Holdings's net margin of 21.02%. Dun & Bradstreet Holdings's return on equity of -1.03% beat Morningstar's return on equity of 23.47%.

Dun & Bradstreet Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 16.26%. On the other hand Morningstar has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 10.18%. Given that Dun & Bradstreet Holdings has higher upside potential than Morningstar, analysts believe Dun & Bradstreet Holdings is more attractive than Morningstar.

Dun & Bradstreet Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Morningstar has a beta of 1.193, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.256%.

Dun & Bradstreet Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.62%. Morningstar offers a yield of 0.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share. Dun & Bradstreet Holdings pays -183.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Morningstar pays out 45.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Morningstar's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Dun & Bradstreet Holdings quarterly revenues are $609.1M, which are larger than Morningstar quarterly revenues of $569.4M. Dun & Bradstreet Holdings's net income of $3.2M is lower than Morningstar's net income of $119.7M. Notably, Dun & Bradstreet Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Morningstar's PE ratio is 44.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dun & Bradstreet Holdings is 2.25x versus 6.60x for Morningstar. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nasdaq has a net margin of 0.53% compared to Dun & Bradstreet Holdings's net margin of 16.09%. Dun & Bradstreet Holdings's return on equity of -1.03% beat Nasdaq's return on equity of 9.57%.

Dun & Bradstreet Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 16.26%. On the other hand Nasdaq has an analysts' consensus of $84.17 which suggests that it could grow by 8.32%. Given that Dun & Bradstreet Holdings has higher upside potential than Nasdaq, analysts believe Dun & Bradstreet Holdings is more attractive than Nasdaq.

Dun & Bradstreet Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nasdaq has a beta of 0.968, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.25%.

Dun & Bradstreet Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.62%. Nasdaq offers a yield of 1.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Dun & Bradstreet Holdings pays -183.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Nasdaq pays out 41.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Nasdaq's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Dun & Bradstreet Holdings quarterly revenues are $609.1M, which are smaller than Nasdaq quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Dun & Bradstreet Holdings's net income of $3.2M is lower than Nasdaq's net income of $306M. Notably, Dun & Bradstreet Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Nasdaq's PE ratio is 46.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dun & Bradstreet Holdings is 2.25x versus 6.34x for Nasdaq. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Value Line has a net margin of 0.53% compared to Dun & Bradstreet Holdings's net margin of 64.3%. Dun & Bradstreet Holdings's return on equity of -1.03% beat Value Line's return on equity of 24.37%.

Dun & Bradstreet Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 16.26%. On the other hand Value Line has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Dun & Bradstreet Holdings has higher upside potential than Value Line, analysts believe Dun & Bradstreet Holdings is more attractive than Value Line.

Dun & Bradstreet Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Value Line has a beta of 0.807, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.301%.

Dun & Bradstreet Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.62%. Value Line offers a yield of 2.18% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Dun & Bradstreet Holdings pays -183.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Value Line pays out 55.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Value Line's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Dun & Bradstreet Holdings quarterly revenues are $609.1M, which are larger than Value Line quarterly revenues of $8.8M. Dun & Bradstreet Holdings's net income of $3.2M is lower than Value Line's net income of $5.7M. Notably, Dun & Bradstreet Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Value Line's PE ratio is 23.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dun & Bradstreet Holdings is 2.25x versus 14.23x for Value Line. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.