APD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

DuPont de Nemours has a net margin of 21.06% compared to Air Products & Chemicals's net margin of -3.82%. Air Products & Chemicals's return on equity of 22.16% beat DuPont de Nemours's return on equity of 2.91%.

Air Products & Chemicals has a consensus price target of $354.97, signalling upside risk potential of 21.21%. On the other hand DuPont de Nemours has an analysts' consensus of $97.24 which suggests that it could grow by 29.81%. Given that DuPont de Nemours has higher upside potential than Air Products & Chemicals, analysts believe DuPont de Nemours is more attractive than Air Products & Chemicals.

Air Products & Chemicals has a beta of 0.854, which suggesting that the stock is 14.626% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DuPont de Nemours has a beta of 1.294, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.398%.

Air Products & Chemicals has a quarterly dividend of $1.77 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.42%. DuPont de Nemours offers a yield of 2.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share. Air Products & Chemicals pays 40.88% of its earnings as a dividend. DuPont de Nemours pays out 90.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Air Products & Chemicals quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are smaller than DuPont de Nemours quarterly revenues of $3.1B. Air Products & Chemicals's net income of $617.4M is higher than DuPont de Nemours's net income of -$118M. Notably, Air Products & Chemicals's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.01x while DuPont de Nemours's PE ratio is 44.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Air Products & Chemicals is 5.42x versus 2.54x for DuPont de Nemours. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hudson Technologies has a net margin of 21.06% compared to Air Products & Chemicals's net margin of -7.4%. Air Products & Chemicals's return on equity of 22.16% beat Hudson Technologies's return on equity of 10.03%.

Air Products & Chemicals has a consensus price target of $354.97, signalling upside risk potential of 21.21%. On the other hand Hudson Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $6.56 which suggests that it could grow by 10.29%. Given that Air Products & Chemicals has higher upside potential than Hudson Technologies, analysts believe Air Products & Chemicals is more attractive than Hudson Technologies.

Air Products & Chemicals has a beta of 0.854, which suggesting that the stock is 14.626% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hudson Technologies has a beta of 1.124, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.405%.

Air Products & Chemicals has a quarterly dividend of $1.77 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.42%. Hudson Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Air Products & Chemicals pays 40.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Hudson Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Air Products & Chemicals's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Air Products & Chemicals quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are larger than Hudson Technologies quarterly revenues of $34.6M. Air Products & Chemicals's net income of $617.4M is higher than Hudson Technologies's net income of -$2.6M. Notably, Air Products & Chemicals's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.01x while Hudson Technologies's PE ratio is 11.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Air Products & Chemicals is 5.42x versus 1.17x for Hudson Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Linde PLC has a net margin of 21.06% compared to Air Products & Chemicals's net margin of 20.83%. Air Products & Chemicals's return on equity of 22.16% beat Linde PLC's return on equity of 16.33%.

Air Products & Chemicals has a consensus price target of $354.97, signalling upside risk potential of 21.21%. On the other hand Linde PLC has an analysts' consensus of $496.05 which suggests that it could grow by 9.44%. Given that Air Products & Chemicals has higher upside potential than Linde PLC, analysts believe Air Products & Chemicals is more attractive than Linde PLC.

Air Products & Chemicals has a beta of 0.854, which suggesting that the stock is 14.626% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Linde PLC has a beta of 0.943, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.702%.

Air Products & Chemicals has a quarterly dividend of $1.77 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.42%. Linde PLC offers a yield of 1.25% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share. Air Products & Chemicals pays 40.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Linde PLC pays out 40.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Air Products & Chemicals quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are smaller than Linde PLC quarterly revenues of $8.3B. Air Products & Chemicals's net income of $617.4M is lower than Linde PLC's net income of $1.7B. Notably, Air Products & Chemicals's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.01x while Linde PLC's PE ratio is 33.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Air Products & Chemicals is 5.42x versus 6.62x for Linde PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nano Magic has a net margin of 21.06% compared to Air Products & Chemicals's net margin of -220.08%. Air Products & Chemicals's return on equity of 22.16% beat Nano Magic's return on equity of -709.6%.

Air Products & Chemicals has a consensus price target of $354.97, signalling upside risk potential of 21.21%. On the other hand Nano Magic has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Air Products & Chemicals has higher upside potential than Nano Magic, analysts believe Air Products & Chemicals is more attractive than Nano Magic.

Air Products & Chemicals has a beta of 0.854, which suggesting that the stock is 14.626% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nano Magic has a beta of 39.210, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3820.961%.

Air Products & Chemicals has a quarterly dividend of $1.77 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.42%. Nano Magic offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Air Products & Chemicals pays 40.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Nano Magic pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Air Products & Chemicals's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Air Products & Chemicals quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are larger than Nano Magic quarterly revenues of $640.3K. Air Products & Chemicals's net income of $617.4M is higher than Nano Magic's net income of -$1.4M. Notably, Air Products & Chemicals's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.01x while Nano Magic's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Air Products & Chemicals is 5.42x versus 2.62x for Nano Magic. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.