AKAM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

F5 has a net margin of 13.72% compared to Akamai Technologies's net margin of 21.72%. Akamai Technologies's return on equity of 10.67% beat F5's return on equity of 19.61%.

Akamai Technologies has a consensus price target of $105.04, signalling upside risk potential of 30.32%. On the other hand F5 has an analysts' consensus of $304.55 which suggests that it could grow by 13.04%. Given that Akamai Technologies has higher upside potential than F5, analysts believe Akamai Technologies is more attractive than F5.

Akamai Technologies has a beta of 0.800, which suggesting that the stock is 19.952% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison F5 has a beta of 1.139, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.901%.

Akamai Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. F5 offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Akamai Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. F5 pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Akamai Technologies quarterly revenues are $1B, which are larger than F5 quarterly revenues of $766.5M. Akamai Technologies's net income of $139.9M is lower than F5's net income of $166.4M. Notably, Akamai Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.72x while F5's PE ratio is 26.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Akamai Technologies is 3.12x versus 5.50x for F5. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Fidelity National Information Services has a net margin of 13.72% compared to Akamai Technologies's net margin of 10.81%. Akamai Technologies's return on equity of 10.67% beat Fidelity National Information Services's return on equity of 8.52%.

Akamai Technologies has a consensus price target of $105.04, signalling upside risk potential of 30.32%. On the other hand Fidelity National Information Services has an analysts' consensus of $84.70 which suggests that it could grow by 13.58%. Given that Akamai Technologies has higher upside potential than Fidelity National Information Services, analysts believe Akamai Technologies is more attractive than Fidelity National Information Services.

Akamai Technologies has a beta of 0.800, which suggesting that the stock is 19.952% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fidelity National Information Services has a beta of 1.064, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.437%.

Akamai Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Fidelity National Information Services offers a yield of 1.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Akamai Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fidelity National Information Services pays out 55.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Fidelity National Information Services's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Akamai Technologies quarterly revenues are $1B, which are smaller than Fidelity National Information Services quarterly revenues of $2.6B. Akamai Technologies's net income of $139.9M is lower than Fidelity National Information Services's net income of $281M. Notably, Akamai Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.72x while Fidelity National Information Services's PE ratio is 28.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Akamai Technologies is 3.12x versus 4.09x for Fidelity National Information Services. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cloudflare has a net margin of 13.72% compared to Akamai Technologies's net margin of -2.79%. Akamai Technologies's return on equity of 10.67% beat Cloudflare's return on equity of -8.83%.

Akamai Technologies has a consensus price target of $105.04, signalling upside risk potential of 30.32%. On the other hand Cloudflare has an analysts' consensus of $142.49 which suggests that it could grow by 23.2%. Given that Akamai Technologies has higher upside potential than Cloudflare, analysts believe Akamai Technologies is more attractive than Cloudflare.

Akamai Technologies has a beta of 0.800, which suggesting that the stock is 19.952% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cloudflare has a beta of 1.593, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.303%.

Akamai Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cloudflare offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Akamai Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cloudflare pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Akamai Technologies quarterly revenues are $1B, which are larger than Cloudflare quarterly revenues of $459.9M. Akamai Technologies's net income of $139.9M is higher than Cloudflare's net income of -$12.8M. Notably, Akamai Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.72x while Cloudflare's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Akamai Technologies is 3.12x versus 23.65x for Cloudflare. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Xerox Holdings has a net margin of 13.72% compared to Akamai Technologies's net margin of -1.3%. Akamai Technologies's return on equity of 10.67% beat Xerox Holdings's return on equity of -62.39%.

Akamai Technologies has a consensus price target of $105.04, signalling upside risk potential of 30.32%. On the other hand Xerox Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $9.48 which suggests that it could grow by 92.63%. Given that Xerox Holdings has higher upside potential than Akamai Technologies, analysts believe Xerox Holdings is more attractive than Akamai Technologies.

Akamai Technologies has a beta of 0.800, which suggesting that the stock is 19.952% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xerox Holdings has a beta of 1.562, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.239%.

Akamai Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Xerox Holdings offers a yield of 17.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Akamai Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Xerox Holdings pays out -10.67% of its earnings as a dividend.

Akamai Technologies quarterly revenues are $1B, which are smaller than Xerox Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Akamai Technologies's net income of $139.9M is higher than Xerox Holdings's net income of -$21M. Notably, Akamai Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.72x while Xerox Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Akamai Technologies is 3.12x versus 0.10x for Xerox Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.