AFL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

AMERISAFE has a net margin of 34.59% compared to Aflac's net margin of 17.82%. Aflac's return on equity of 22.22% beat AMERISAFE's return on equity of 18.9%.

Aflac has a consensus price target of $105.07, signalling downside risk potential of -4.86%. On the other hand AMERISAFE has an analysts' consensus of $57.67 which suggests that it could grow by 9.82%. Given that AMERISAFE has higher upside potential than Aflac, analysts believe AMERISAFE is more attractive than Aflac.

Aflac has a beta of 0.934, which suggesting that the stock is 6.56% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AMERISAFE has a beta of 0.331, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 66.941%.

Aflac has a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.88%. AMERISAFE offers a yield of 2.86% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. Aflac pays 19.97% of its earnings as a dividend. AMERISAFE pays out 154.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Aflac's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but AMERISAFE's is not.

Aflac quarterly revenues are $5.5B, which are larger than AMERISAFE quarterly revenues of $74M. Aflac's net income of $1.9B is higher than AMERISAFE's net income of $13.2M. Notably, Aflac's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.50x while AMERISAFE's PE ratio is 18.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aflac is 3.26x versus 3.25x for AMERISAFE. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Employers Holdings has a net margin of 34.59% compared to Aflac's net margin of 13.07%. Aflac's return on equity of 22.22% beat Employers Holdings's return on equity of 11.37%.

Aflac has a consensus price target of $105.07, signalling downside risk potential of -4.86%. On the other hand Employers Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $55.50 which suggests that it could grow by 9.81%. Given that Employers Holdings has higher upside potential than Aflac, analysts believe Employers Holdings is more attractive than Aflac.

Aflac has a beta of 0.934, which suggesting that the stock is 6.56% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Employers Holdings has a beta of 0.210, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 78.953%.

Aflac has a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.88%. Employers Holdings offers a yield of 2.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Aflac pays 19.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Employers Holdings pays out 25.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Aflac quarterly revenues are $5.5B, which are larger than Employers Holdings quarterly revenues of $216.6M. Aflac's net income of $1.9B is higher than Employers Holdings's net income of $28.3M. Notably, Aflac's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.50x while Employers Holdings's PE ratio is 10.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aflac is 3.26x versus 1.45x for Employers Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Trupanion has a net margin of 34.59% compared to Aflac's net margin of 0.49%. Aflac's return on equity of 22.22% beat Trupanion's return on equity of -3.1%.

Aflac has a consensus price target of $105.07, signalling downside risk potential of -4.86%. On the other hand Trupanion has an analysts' consensus of $52.60 which suggests that it could grow by 38.79%. Given that Trupanion has higher upside potential than Aflac, analysts believe Trupanion is more attractive than Aflac.

Aflac has a beta of 0.934, which suggesting that the stock is 6.56% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Trupanion has a beta of 1.697, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.691%.

Aflac has a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.88%. Trupanion offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Aflac pays 19.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Trupanion pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Aflac's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Aflac quarterly revenues are $5.5B, which are larger than Trupanion quarterly revenues of $337.3M. Aflac's net income of $1.9B is higher than Trupanion's net income of $1.7M. Notably, Aflac's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.50x while Trupanion's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aflac is 3.26x versus 1.25x for Trupanion. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Unum Group has a net margin of 34.59% compared to Aflac's net margin of 10.88%. Aflac's return on equity of 22.22% beat Unum Group's return on equity of 17.03%.

Aflac has a consensus price target of $105.07, signalling downside risk potential of -4.86%. On the other hand Unum Group has an analysts' consensus of $91.85 which suggests that it could grow by 11.56%. Given that Unum Group has higher upside potential than Aflac, analysts believe Unum Group is more attractive than Aflac.

Aflac has a beta of 0.934, which suggesting that the stock is 6.56% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Unum Group has a beta of 0.745, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.503%.

Aflac has a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.88%. Unum Group offers a yield of 1.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. Aflac pays 19.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Unum Group pays out 16.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Aflac quarterly revenues are $5.5B, which are larger than Unum Group quarterly revenues of $3.2B. Aflac's net income of $1.9B is higher than Unum Group's net income of $348.7M. Notably, Aflac's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.50x while Unum Group's PE ratio is 8.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aflac is 3.26x versus 1.21x for Unum Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.