Why Caesars’ Digital Arm May Be the Gaming Giant’s Best-Kept Secret
It’s not often that a company with the scale and…
Buy
87
YZCFF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$0.07
Seasonality move
:
10.59%
Day range:
$0.07 - $0.07
52-week range:
$0.03 - $0.07
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
10.93x
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
0.96x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
--
1-year change:
-0.4%
Market cap:
$1.2B
Revenue:
$11.3B
EPS (TTM):
$0.01
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
YZCFF
Sinopec Oilfield Service
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LSE
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PCCYF
PetroChina
|
$112.3B | -- | 14.12% | -- | -- |
|
RCON
Recon Technology
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SEGYY
SPT Energy Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SNPMF
China Petroleum & Chemical
|
$115.2B | -- | 13.73% | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
YZCFF
Sinopec Oilfield Service
|
$0.07 | -- | $1.2B | 10.93x | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
LSE
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
PCCYF
PetroChina
|
$0.73 | -- | $134.3B | 5.98x | $0.03 | 8.61% | 0.32x |
|
RCON
Recon Technology
|
$2.13 | -- | $59.5M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 1.98x |
|
SEGYY
SPT Energy Group
|
$0.51 | -- | $49.5M | 19.98x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.19x |
|
SNPMF
China Petroleum & Chemical
|
$0.53 | -- | $64.6B | 9.35x | $0.02 | 9.11% | 0.15x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
YZCFF
Sinopec Oilfield Service
|
74.04% | -0.068 | 320.04% | 0.57x |
|
LSE
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
PCCYF
PetroChina
|
13.12% | 0.257 | 18.45% | 0.57x |
|
RCON
Recon Technology
|
6.06% | 2.495 | 22.17% | 9.49x |
|
SEGYY
SPT Energy Group
|
33.38% | -3.567 | 180.49% | 0.94x |
|
SNPMF
China Petroleum & Chemical
|
26.52% | -0.061 | -- | 0.35x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
YZCFF
Sinopec Oilfield Service
|
$194.5M | $84.6M | 2.65% | 9.65% | 3.41% | -$55.1M |
|
LSE
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PCCYF
PetroChina
|
$22.5B | $8.7B | 8.45% | 9.77% | 9.78% | -$40B |
|
RCON
Recon Technology
|
-- | -- | -10.39% | -11.14% | -- | -- |
|
SEGYY
SPT Energy Group
|
-- | -- | -3.12% | -4.38% | -- | -- |
|
SNPMF
China Petroleum & Chemical
|
$16.3B | $1.8B | 3.94% | 6.14% | 2.08% | $4.1B |
Sinopec Oilfield Service vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns YZCFF or LSE?
has a net margin of 1.24% compared to Sinopec Oilfield Service's net margin of --. Sinopec Oilfield Service's return on equity of 9.65% beat 's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital YZCFFSinopec Oilfield Service7.71% $0.00 $5B LSE-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About YZCFF or LSE?
Sinopec Oilfield Service has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sinopec Oilfield Service has higher upside potential than , analysts believe Sinopec Oilfield Service is more attractive than .
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings YZCFFSinopec Oilfield Service0 0 0 LSE0 0 0 -
Is YZCFF or LSE More Risky?
Sinopec Oilfield Service has a beta of 0.382, which suggesting that the stock is 61.79% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock YZCFF or LSE?
Sinopec Oilfield Service has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sinopec Oilfield Service pays 120.95% of its earnings as a dividend. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios YZCFF or LSE?
Sinopec Oilfield Service quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than quarterly revenues of --. Sinopec Oilfield Service's net income of $31.3M is higher than 's net income of --. Notably, Sinopec Oilfield Service's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.93x while 's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sinopec Oilfield Service is -- versus -- for . Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income YZCFFSinopec Oilfield Service-- 10.93x $2.5B $31.3M LSE-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns YZCFF or PCCYF?
PetroChina has a net margin of 1.24% compared to Sinopec Oilfield Service's net margin of 6.25%. Sinopec Oilfield Service's return on equity of 9.65% beat PetroChina's return on equity of 9.77%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital YZCFFSinopec Oilfield Service7.71% $0.00 $5B PCCYFPetroChina22.93% $0.03 $271.5B -
What do Analysts Say About YZCFF or PCCYF?
Sinopec Oilfield Service has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand PetroChina has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sinopec Oilfield Service has higher upside potential than PetroChina, analysts believe Sinopec Oilfield Service is more attractive than PetroChina.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings YZCFFSinopec Oilfield Service0 0 0 PCCYFPetroChina0 0 0 -
Is YZCFF or PCCYF More Risky?
Sinopec Oilfield Service has a beta of 0.382, which suggesting that the stock is 61.79% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PetroChina has a beta of 0.781, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.939%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock YZCFF or PCCYF?
Sinopec Oilfield Service has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. PetroChina offers a yield of 8.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Sinopec Oilfield Service pays 120.95% of its earnings as a dividend. PetroChina pays out 60.33% of its earnings as a dividend. PetroChina's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Sinopec Oilfield Service's is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios YZCFF or PCCYF?
Sinopec Oilfield Service quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are smaller than PetroChina quarterly revenues of $98.1B. Sinopec Oilfield Service's net income of $31.3M is lower than PetroChina's net income of $6.1B. Notably, Sinopec Oilfield Service's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.93x while PetroChina's PE ratio is 5.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sinopec Oilfield Service is -- versus 0.32x for PetroChina. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income YZCFFSinopec Oilfield Service-- 10.93x $2.5B $31.3M PCCYFPetroChina0.32x 5.98x $98.1B $6.1B
-
Which has Higher Returns YZCFF or RCON?
Recon Technology has a net margin of 1.24% compared to Sinopec Oilfield Service's net margin of --. Sinopec Oilfield Service's return on equity of 9.65% beat Recon Technology's return on equity of -11.14%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital YZCFFSinopec Oilfield Service7.71% $0.00 $5B RCONRecon Technology-- -- $72M -
What do Analysts Say About YZCFF or RCON?
Sinopec Oilfield Service has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Recon Technology has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sinopec Oilfield Service has higher upside potential than Recon Technology, analysts believe Sinopec Oilfield Service is more attractive than Recon Technology.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings YZCFFSinopec Oilfield Service0 0 0 RCONRecon Technology0 0 0 -
Is YZCFF or RCON More Risky?
Sinopec Oilfield Service has a beta of 0.382, which suggesting that the stock is 61.79% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Recon Technology has a beta of 2.393, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 139.347%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock YZCFF or RCON?
Sinopec Oilfield Service has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Recon Technology offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sinopec Oilfield Service pays 120.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Recon Technology pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios YZCFF or RCON?
Sinopec Oilfield Service quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than Recon Technology quarterly revenues of --. Sinopec Oilfield Service's net income of $31.3M is higher than Recon Technology's net income of --. Notably, Sinopec Oilfield Service's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.93x while Recon Technology's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sinopec Oilfield Service is -- versus 1.98x for Recon Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income YZCFFSinopec Oilfield Service-- 10.93x $2.5B $31.3M RCONRecon Technology1.98x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns YZCFF or SEGYY?
SPT Energy Group has a net margin of 1.24% compared to Sinopec Oilfield Service's net margin of --. Sinopec Oilfield Service's return on equity of 9.65% beat SPT Energy Group's return on equity of -4.38%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital YZCFFSinopec Oilfield Service7.71% $0.00 $5B SEGYYSPT Energy Group-- -- $252.8M -
What do Analysts Say About YZCFF or SEGYY?
Sinopec Oilfield Service has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SPT Energy Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sinopec Oilfield Service has higher upside potential than SPT Energy Group, analysts believe Sinopec Oilfield Service is more attractive than SPT Energy Group.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings YZCFFSinopec Oilfield Service0 0 0 SEGYYSPT Energy Group0 0 0 -
Is YZCFF or SEGYY More Risky?
Sinopec Oilfield Service has a beta of 0.382, which suggesting that the stock is 61.79% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SPT Energy Group has a beta of -0.331, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 133.144%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock YZCFF or SEGYY?
Sinopec Oilfield Service has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SPT Energy Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sinopec Oilfield Service pays 120.95% of its earnings as a dividend. SPT Energy Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios YZCFF or SEGYY?
Sinopec Oilfield Service quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than SPT Energy Group quarterly revenues of --. Sinopec Oilfield Service's net income of $31.3M is higher than SPT Energy Group's net income of --. Notably, Sinopec Oilfield Service's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.93x while SPT Energy Group's PE ratio is 19.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sinopec Oilfield Service is -- versus 0.19x for SPT Energy Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income YZCFFSinopec Oilfield Service-- 10.93x $2.5B $31.3M SEGYYSPT Energy Group0.19x 19.98x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns YZCFF or SNPMF?
China Petroleum & Chemical has a net margin of 1.24% compared to Sinopec Oilfield Service's net margin of 1.02%. Sinopec Oilfield Service's return on equity of 9.65% beat China Petroleum & Chemical's return on equity of 6.14%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital YZCFFSinopec Oilfield Service7.71% $0.00 $5B SNPMFChina Petroleum & Chemical14.79% $0.01 $176.4B -
What do Analysts Say About YZCFF or SNPMF?
Sinopec Oilfield Service has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand China Petroleum & Chemical has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sinopec Oilfield Service has higher upside potential than China Petroleum & Chemical, analysts believe Sinopec Oilfield Service is more attractive than China Petroleum & Chemical.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings YZCFFSinopec Oilfield Service0 0 0 SNPMFChina Petroleum & Chemical0 0 0 -
Is YZCFF or SNPMF More Risky?
Sinopec Oilfield Service has a beta of 0.382, which suggesting that the stock is 61.79% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Petroleum & Chemical has a beta of 0.478, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.191%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock YZCFF or SNPMF?
Sinopec Oilfield Service has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. China Petroleum & Chemical offers a yield of 9.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. Sinopec Oilfield Service pays 120.95% of its earnings as a dividend. China Petroleum & Chemical pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios YZCFF or SNPMF?
Sinopec Oilfield Service quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are smaller than China Petroleum & Chemical quarterly revenues of $110.4B. Sinopec Oilfield Service's net income of $31.3M is lower than China Petroleum & Chemical's net income of $1.1B. Notably, Sinopec Oilfield Service's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.93x while China Petroleum & Chemical's PE ratio is 9.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sinopec Oilfield Service is -- versus 0.15x for China Petroleum & Chemical. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income YZCFFSinopec Oilfield Service-- 10.93x $2.5B $31.3M SNPMFChina Petroleum & Chemical0.15x 9.35x $110.4B $1.1B
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will Tyson Foods Stock Bounce Back?
Tyson Foods, Inc. (NYSE:TSN) is one of the biggest food…
Will Iovance Biotherapeutics Stock Bounce Back?
Iovance Biotherapeutics (NASDAQ:IOVA) is a fledgling pharmaceutical company that specializes…
Stock Ideas
Buy
64
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 113x
Buy
55
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Buy
61
QMCO alert for Dec 21
Quantum [QMCO] is up 26.28% over the past day.
Sell
46
NUKK alert for Dec 21
Nukkleus [NUKK] is down 22.94% over the past day.
Sell
1
IIPR alert for Dec 21
Innovative Industrial Properties [IIPR] is down 22.7% over the past day.
