VMHG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Drive Shack has a net margin of -- compared to Victory Marine Holdings's net margin of --. Victory Marine Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Drive Shack's return on equity of --.

Victory Marine Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Drive Shack has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1498.72%. Given that Drive Shack has higher upside potential than Victory Marine Holdings, analysts believe Drive Shack is more attractive than Victory Marine Holdings.

Victory Marine Holdings has a beta of 7.989, which suggesting that the stock is 698.882% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Drive Shack has a beta of 2.114, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 111.352%.

Victory Marine Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Drive Shack offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Victory Marine Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Drive Shack pays out -3.32% of its earnings as a dividend.

Victory Marine Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Drive Shack quarterly revenues of --. Victory Marine Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Drive Shack's net income of --. Notably, Victory Marine Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Drive Shack's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Victory Marine Holdings is -- versus 0.04x for Drive Shack. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

HWH International has a net margin of -- compared to Victory Marine Holdings's net margin of -158.74%. Victory Marine Holdings's return on equity of -- beat HWH International's return on equity of --.

Victory Marine Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand HWH International has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Victory Marine Holdings has higher upside potential than HWH International, analysts believe Victory Marine Holdings is more attractive than HWH International.

Victory Marine Holdings has a beta of 7.989, which suggesting that the stock is 698.882% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison HWH International has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Victory Marine Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. HWH International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Victory Marine Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. HWH International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Victory Marine Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than HWH International quarterly revenues of $345.5K. Victory Marine Holdings's net income of -- is lower than HWH International's net income of -$548.5K. Notably, Victory Marine Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while HWH International's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Victory Marine Holdings is -- versus -- for HWH International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kenilworth Systems has a net margin of -- compared to Victory Marine Holdings's net margin of -1628.26%. Victory Marine Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Kenilworth Systems's return on equity of --.

Victory Marine Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kenilworth Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Victory Marine Holdings has higher upside potential than Kenilworth Systems, analysts believe Victory Marine Holdings is more attractive than Kenilworth Systems.

Victory Marine Holdings has a beta of 7.989, which suggesting that the stock is 698.882% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kenilworth Systems has a beta of 4.941, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 394.144%.

Victory Marine Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kenilworth Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Victory Marine Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kenilworth Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Victory Marine Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Kenilworth Systems quarterly revenues of $5K. Victory Marine Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Kenilworth Systems's net income of -$82.5K. Notably, Victory Marine Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Kenilworth Systems's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Victory Marine Holdings is -- versus -- for Kenilworth Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Planet Fitness has a net margin of -- compared to Victory Marine Holdings's net margin of 14.38%. Victory Marine Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Planet Fitness's return on equity of --.

Victory Marine Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Planet Fitness has an analysts' consensus of $105.46 which suggests that it could grow by 6.24%. Given that Planet Fitness has higher upside potential than Victory Marine Holdings, analysts believe Planet Fitness is more attractive than Victory Marine Holdings.

Victory Marine Holdings has a beta of 7.989, which suggesting that the stock is 698.882% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Planet Fitness has a beta of 1.527, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.692%.

Victory Marine Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Planet Fitness offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Victory Marine Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Planet Fitness pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Victory Marine Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Planet Fitness quarterly revenues of $292.2M. Victory Marine Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Planet Fitness's net income of $42M. Notably, Victory Marine Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Planet Fitness's PE ratio is 53.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Victory Marine Holdings is -- versus 7.60x for Planet Fitness. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.