SOIEF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Kirby has a net margin of 13.54% compared to Stolt-Nielsen's net margin of 10.83%. Stolt-Nielsen's return on equity of 20.03% beat Kirby's return on equity of 9.47%.

Stolt-Nielsen has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kirby has an analysts' consensus of $137.17 which suggests that it could grow by 32.02%. Given that Kirby has higher upside potential than Stolt-Nielsen, analysts believe Kirby is more attractive than Stolt-Nielsen.

Stolt-Nielsen has a beta of 0.553, which suggesting that the stock is 44.668% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kirby has a beta of 1.208, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.812%.

Stolt-Nielsen has a quarterly dividend of $1.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.7%. Kirby offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Stolt-Nielsen pays 40.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Kirby pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Stolt-Nielsen's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Stolt-Nielsen quarterly revenues are $732.8M, which are smaller than Kirby quarterly revenues of $831.1M. Stolt-Nielsen's net income of $99.2M is higher than Kirby's net income of $90M. Notably, Stolt-Nielsen's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.43x while Kirby's PE ratio is 19.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Stolt-Nielsen is 0.48x versus 1.87x for Kirby. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Matson has a net margin of 13.54% compared to Stolt-Nielsen's net margin of 20.7%. Stolt-Nielsen's return on equity of 20.03% beat Matson's return on equity of 16.95%.

Stolt-Nielsen has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Matson has an analysts' consensus of $150.50 which suggests that it could grow by 10.18%. Given that Matson has higher upside potential than Stolt-Nielsen, analysts believe Matson is more attractive than Stolt-Nielsen.

Stolt-Nielsen has a beta of 0.553, which suggesting that the stock is 44.668% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Matson has a beta of 1.066, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.595%.

Stolt-Nielsen has a quarterly dividend of $1.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.7%. Matson offers a yield of 0.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. Stolt-Nielsen pays 40.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Matson pays out 15.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Stolt-Nielsen quarterly revenues are $732.8M, which are smaller than Matson quarterly revenues of $962M. Stolt-Nielsen's net income of $99.2M is lower than Matson's net income of $199.1M. Notably, Stolt-Nielsen's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.43x while Matson's PE ratio is 11.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Stolt-Nielsen is 0.48x versus 1.42x for Matson. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pangaea Logistics Solutions has a net margin of 13.54% compared to Stolt-Nielsen's net margin of 3.34%. Stolt-Nielsen's return on equity of 20.03% beat Pangaea Logistics Solutions's return on equity of 5.74%.

Stolt-Nielsen has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Pangaea Logistics Solutions has an analysts' consensus of $9.82 which suggests that it could grow by 80.79%. Given that Pangaea Logistics Solutions has higher upside potential than Stolt-Nielsen, analysts believe Pangaea Logistics Solutions is more attractive than Stolt-Nielsen.

Stolt-Nielsen has a beta of 0.553, which suggesting that the stock is 44.668% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pangaea Logistics Solutions has a beta of 0.845, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.528%.

Stolt-Nielsen has a quarterly dividend of $1.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.7%. Pangaea Logistics Solutions offers a yield of 7.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Stolt-Nielsen pays 40.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Pangaea Logistics Solutions pays out 68.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Stolt-Nielsen quarterly revenues are $732.8M, which are larger than Pangaea Logistics Solutions quarterly revenues of $153.1M. Stolt-Nielsen's net income of $99.2M is higher than Pangaea Logistics Solutions's net income of $5.1M. Notably, Stolt-Nielsen's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.43x while Pangaea Logistics Solutions's PE ratio is 11.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Stolt-Nielsen is 0.48x versus 0.48x for Pangaea Logistics Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SFL has a net margin of 13.54% compared to Stolt-Nielsen's net margin of 17.58%. Stolt-Nielsen's return on equity of 20.03% beat SFL's return on equity of 13.36%.

Stolt-Nielsen has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SFL has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 19.8%. Given that SFL has higher upside potential than Stolt-Nielsen, analysts believe SFL is more attractive than Stolt-Nielsen.

Stolt-Nielsen has a beta of 0.553, which suggesting that the stock is 44.668% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SFL has a beta of 0.676, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.419%.

Stolt-Nielsen has a quarterly dividend of $1.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.7%. SFL offers a yield of 9.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. Stolt-Nielsen pays 40.62% of its earnings as a dividend. SFL pays out 146.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Stolt-Nielsen's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but SFL's is not.

Stolt-Nielsen quarterly revenues are $732.8M, which are larger than SFL quarterly revenues of $253.2M. Stolt-Nielsen's net income of $99.2M is higher than SFL's net income of $44.5M. Notably, Stolt-Nielsen's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.43x while SFL's PE ratio is 9.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Stolt-Nielsen is 0.48x versus 1.58x for SFL. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.