RYCEY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

nVent Electric PLC has a net margin of -- compared to Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC's net margin of 1.42%. Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC's return on equity of -- beat nVent Electric PLC's return on equity of 10.26%.

Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand nVent Electric PLC has an analysts' consensus of $77.77 which suggests that it could grow by 42.47%. Given that nVent Electric PLC has higher upside potential than Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC, analysts believe nVent Electric PLC is more attractive than Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC.

Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC has a beta of 1.706, which suggesting that the stock is 70.604% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison nVent Electric PLC has a beta of 1.315, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.461%.

Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. nVent Electric PLC offers a yield of 1.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. nVent Electric PLC pays out 38.22% of its earnings as a dividend. nVent Electric PLC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than nVent Electric PLC quarterly revenues of $752.2M. Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC's net income of -- is lower than nVent Electric PLC's net income of $10.7M. Notably, Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.35x while nVent Electric PLC's PE ratio is 27.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC is 3.65x versus 2.79x for nVent Electric PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pentair PLC has a net margin of -- compared to Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC's net margin of 17.1%. Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC's return on equity of -- beat Pentair PLC's return on equity of 18.35%.

Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Pentair PLC has an analysts' consensus of $112.08 which suggests that it could grow by 25.49%. Given that Pentair PLC has higher upside potential than Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC, analysts believe Pentair PLC is more attractive than Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC.

Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC has a beta of 1.706, which suggesting that the stock is 70.604% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pentair PLC has a beta of 1.227, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.735%.

Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Pentair PLC offers a yield of 1.05% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pentair PLC pays out 24.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Pentair PLC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Pentair PLC quarterly revenues of $972.9M. Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC's net income of -- is lower than Pentair PLC's net income of $166.4M. Notably, Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.35x while Pentair PLC's PE ratio is 23.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC is 3.65x versus 3.65x for Pentair PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RELX PLC has a net margin of -- compared to Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC's net margin of --. Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC's return on equity of -- beat RELX PLC's return on equity of 57.59%.

Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand RELX PLC has an analysts' consensus of $53.23 which suggests that it could grow by 6.3%. Given that RELX PLC has higher upside potential than Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC, analysts believe RELX PLC is more attractive than Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC.

Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC has a beta of 1.706, which suggesting that the stock is 70.604% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RELX PLC has a beta of 0.897, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.322%.

Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. RELX PLC offers a yield of 1.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. RELX PLC pays out 57.96% of its earnings as a dividend. RELX PLC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than RELX PLC quarterly revenues of --. Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC's net income of -- is lower than RELX PLC's net income of --. Notably, Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.35x while RELX PLC's PE ratio is 38.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC is 3.65x versus 7.84x for RELX PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rentokil Initial PLC has a net margin of -- compared to Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC's net margin of --. Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC's return on equity of -- beat Rentokil Initial PLC's return on equity of 7.4%.

Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Rentokil Initial PLC has an analysts' consensus of $34.30 which suggests that it could grow by 48.1%. Given that Rentokil Initial PLC has higher upside potential than Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC, analysts believe Rentokil Initial PLC is more attractive than Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC.

Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC has a beta of 1.706, which suggesting that the stock is 70.604% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rentokil Initial PLC has a beta of 1.129, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.919%.

Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rentokil Initial PLC offers a yield of 2.51% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rentokil Initial PLC pays out 74.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Rentokil Initial PLC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Rentokil Initial PLC quarterly revenues of --. Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC's net income of -- is lower than Rentokil Initial PLC's net income of --. Notably, Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.35x while Rentokil Initial PLC's PE ratio is 30.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC is 3.65x versus 1.69x for Rentokil Initial PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.