MSCF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Grayscale Decentralized Finance (DeFi) Fund LLC has a net margin of 65.51% compared to MSC Income Fund's net margin of -539.07%. MSC Income Fund's return on equity of 9.28% beat Grayscale Decentralized Finance (DeFi) Fund LLC's return on equity of 24.88%.

MSC Income Fund has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Grayscale Decentralized Finance (DeFi) Fund LLC has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that MSC Income Fund has higher upside potential than Grayscale Decentralized Finance (DeFi) Fund LLC, analysts believe MSC Income Fund is more attractive than Grayscale Decentralized Finance (DeFi) Fund LLC.

MSC Income Fund has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Grayscale Decentralized Finance (DeFi) Fund LLC has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

MSC Income Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 6%. Grayscale Decentralized Finance (DeFi) Fund LLC offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MSC Income Fund pays 55.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Grayscale Decentralized Finance (DeFi) Fund LLC pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. MSC Income Fund's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MSC Income Fund quarterly revenues are $11.3M, which are larger than Grayscale Decentralized Finance (DeFi) Fund LLC quarterly revenues of -$23.6K. MSC Income Fund's net income of $7.4M is higher than Grayscale Decentralized Finance (DeFi) Fund LLC's net income of -$709.3K. Notably, MSC Income Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.90x while Grayscale Decentralized Finance (DeFi) Fund LLC's PE ratio is 51.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MSC Income Fund is 13.93x versus -- for Grayscale Decentralized Finance (DeFi) Fund LLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Chicago Atlantic BDC has a net margin of 65.51% compared to MSC Income Fund's net margin of -5.94%. MSC Income Fund's return on equity of 9.28% beat Chicago Atlantic BDC's return on equity of 4.89%.

MSC Income Fund has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Chicago Atlantic BDC has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 10.03%. Given that Chicago Atlantic BDC has higher upside potential than MSC Income Fund, analysts believe Chicago Atlantic BDC is more attractive than MSC Income Fund.

MSC Income Fund has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chicago Atlantic BDC has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

MSC Income Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 6%. Chicago Atlantic BDC offers a yield of 9.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. MSC Income Fund pays 55.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Chicago Atlantic BDC pays out 112.58% of its earnings as a dividend. MSC Income Fund's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Chicago Atlantic BDC's is not.

MSC Income Fund quarterly revenues are $11.3M, which are larger than Chicago Atlantic BDC quarterly revenues of $2.8M. MSC Income Fund's net income of $7.4M is higher than Chicago Atlantic BDC's net income of -$165K. Notably, MSC Income Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.90x while Chicago Atlantic BDC's PE ratio is 18.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MSC Income Fund is 13.93x versus 6.40x for Chicago Atlantic BDC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Northern Trust has a net margin of 65.51% compared to MSC Income Fund's net margin of 23.62%. MSC Income Fund's return on equity of 9.28% beat Northern Trust's return on equity of 13.79%.

MSC Income Fund has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Northern Trust has an analysts' consensus of $91.93 which suggests that it could grow by 4.53%. Given that Northern Trust has higher upside potential than MSC Income Fund, analysts believe Northern Trust is more attractive than MSC Income Fund.

MSC Income Fund has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Northern Trust has a beta of 1.068, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.817%.

MSC Income Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 6%. Northern Trust offers a yield of 2.89% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share. MSC Income Fund pays 55.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Northern Trust pays out 59.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MSC Income Fund quarterly revenues are $11.3M, which are smaller than Northern Trust quarterly revenues of $2B. MSC Income Fund's net income of $7.4M is lower than Northern Trust's net income of $464.9M. Notably, MSC Income Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.90x while Northern Trust's PE ratio is 12.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MSC Income Fund is 13.93x versus 2.69x for Northern Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

180 Degree Capital has a net margin of 65.51% compared to MSC Income Fund's net margin of --. MSC Income Fund's return on equity of 9.28% beat 180 Degree Capital's return on equity of -32.71%.

MSC Income Fund has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand 180 Degree Capital has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that MSC Income Fund has higher upside potential than 180 Degree Capital, analysts believe MSC Income Fund is more attractive than 180 Degree Capital.

MSC Income Fund has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison 180 Degree Capital has a beta of 0.865, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.544%.

MSC Income Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 6%. 180 Degree Capital offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MSC Income Fund pays 55.04% of its earnings as a dividend. 180 Degree Capital pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. MSC Income Fund's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MSC Income Fund quarterly revenues are $11.3M, which are larger than 180 Degree Capital quarterly revenues of --. MSC Income Fund's net income of $7.4M is higher than 180 Degree Capital's net income of --. Notably, MSC Income Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.90x while 180 Degree Capital's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MSC Income Fund is 13.93x versus -- for 180 Degree Capital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.