MGDDY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hermes International SA has a net margin of -- compared to Michelin's net margin of --. Michelin's return on equity of 10.73% beat Hermes International SA's return on equity of 30.37%.

Michelin has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Hermes International SA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Michelin has higher upside potential than Hermes International SA, analysts believe Michelin is more attractive than Hermes International SA.

Michelin has a beta of 1.082, which suggesting that the stock is 8.196% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hermes International SA has a beta of 1.079, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.922%.

Michelin has a quarterly dividend of $0.73 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.4%. Hermes International SA offers a yield of 0.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.32 per share. Michelin pays 45.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Hermes International SA pays out 32.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Michelin quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Hermes International SA quarterly revenues of --. Michelin's net income of -- is lower than Hermes International SA's net income of --. Notably, Michelin's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.59x while Hermes International SA's PE ratio is 52.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Michelin is 0.80x versus 16.36x for Hermes International SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lvmh Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE has a net margin of -- compared to Michelin's net margin of --. Michelin's return on equity of 10.73% beat Lvmh Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE's return on equity of 21.98%.

Michelin has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Lvmh Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 11.12%. Given that Lvmh Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE has higher upside potential than Michelin, analysts believe Lvmh Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE is more attractive than Michelin.

Michelin has a beta of 1.082, which suggesting that the stock is 8.196% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lvmh Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE has a beta of 1.101, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.085%.

Michelin has a quarterly dividend of $0.73 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.4%. Lvmh Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE offers a yield of 2.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.16 per share. Michelin pays 45.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Lvmh Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE pays out 41.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Michelin quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Lvmh Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE quarterly revenues of --. Michelin's net income of -- is lower than Lvmh Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE's net income of --. Notably, Michelin's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.59x while Lvmh Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE's PE ratio is 21.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Michelin is 0.80x versus 3.54x for Lvmh Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kering SA has a net margin of -- compared to Michelin's net margin of --. Michelin's return on equity of 10.73% beat Kering SA's return on equity of 13.08%.

Michelin has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kering SA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Michelin has higher upside potential than Kering SA, analysts believe Michelin is more attractive than Kering SA.

Michelin has a beta of 1.082, which suggesting that the stock is 8.196% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kering SA has a beta of 1.188, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.81%.

Michelin has a quarterly dividend of $0.73 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.4%. Kering SA offers a yield of 6.22% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.02 per share. Michelin pays 45.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Kering SA pays out 57.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Michelin quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Kering SA quarterly revenues of --. Michelin's net income of -- is lower than Kering SA's net income of --. Notably, Michelin's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.59x while Kering SA's PE ratio is 13.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Michelin is 0.80x versus 1.50x for Kering SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Valeo SA has a net margin of -- compared to Michelin's net margin of --. Michelin's return on equity of 10.73% beat Valeo SA's return on equity of 5.51%.

Michelin has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Valeo SA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 60.37%. Given that Valeo SA has higher upside potential than Michelin, analysts believe Valeo SA is more attractive than Michelin.

Michelin has a beta of 1.082, which suggesting that the stock is 8.196% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Valeo SA has a beta of 1.666, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 66.632%.

Michelin has a quarterly dividend of $0.73 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.4%. Valeo SA offers a yield of 4.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. Michelin pays 45.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Valeo SA pays out 41.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Michelin quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Valeo SA quarterly revenues of --. Michelin's net income of -- is lower than Valeo SA's net income of --. Notably, Michelin's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.59x while Valeo SA's PE ratio is 8.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Michelin is 0.80x versus 0.09x for Valeo SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.