MGDDY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hermes International SA has a net margin of -- compared to Michelin's net margin of --. Michelin's return on equity of 10.73% beat Hermes International SA's return on equity of 29.01%.

Michelin has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Hermes International SA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Michelin has higher upside potential than Hermes International SA, analysts believe Michelin is more attractive than Hermes International SA.

Michelin has a beta of 1.014, which suggesting that the stock is 1.437% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hermes International SA has a beta of 1.196, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.6%.

Michelin has a quarterly dividend of $0.73 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.32%. Hermes International SA offers a yield of 0.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share. Michelin pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hermes International SA pays out 58.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Hermes International SA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Michelin quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Hermes International SA quarterly revenues of --. Michelin's net income of -- is lower than Hermes International SA's net income of --. Notably, Michelin's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.98x while Hermes International SA's PE ratio is 56.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Michelin is 0.83x versus 17.20x for Hermes International SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lvmh Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE has a net margin of -- compared to Michelin's net margin of --. Michelin's return on equity of 10.73% beat Lvmh Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE's return on equity of 18.98%.

Michelin has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Lvmh Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE has an analysts' consensus of $160.37 which suggests that it could grow by 32.27%. Given that Lvmh Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE has higher upside potential than Michelin, analysts believe Lvmh Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE is more attractive than Michelin.

Michelin has a beta of 1.014, which suggesting that the stock is 1.437% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lvmh Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE has a beta of 1.182, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.248%.

Michelin has a quarterly dividend of $0.73 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.32%. Lvmh Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE offers a yield of 2.28% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.16 per share. Michelin pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lvmh Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE pays out 51.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Lvmh Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Michelin quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Lvmh Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE quarterly revenues of --. Michelin's net income of -- is lower than Lvmh Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE's net income of --. Notably, Michelin's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.98x while Lvmh Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE's PE ratio is 22.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Michelin is 0.83x versus 3.34x for Lvmh Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kering SA has a net margin of -- compared to Michelin's net margin of --. Michelin's return on equity of 10.73% beat Kering SA's return on equity of 7.17%.

Michelin has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kering SA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Michelin has higher upside potential than Kering SA, analysts believe Michelin is more attractive than Kering SA.

Michelin has a beta of 1.014, which suggesting that the stock is 1.437% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kering SA has a beta of 1.336, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.611%.

Michelin has a quarterly dividend of $0.73 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.32%. Kering SA offers a yield of 6.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. Michelin pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kering SA pays out 151.46% of its earnings as a dividend.

Michelin quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Kering SA quarterly revenues of --. Michelin's net income of -- is lower than Kering SA's net income of --. Notably, Michelin's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.98x while Kering SA's PE ratio is 19.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Michelin is 0.83x versus 1.30x for Kering SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Valeo SA has a net margin of -- compared to Michelin's net margin of --. Michelin's return on equity of 10.73% beat Valeo SA's return on equity of 3.67%.

Michelin has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Valeo SA has an analysts' consensus of $7.30 which suggests that it could grow by 66.29%. Given that Valeo SA has higher upside potential than Michelin, analysts believe Valeo SA is more attractive than Michelin.

Michelin has a beta of 1.014, which suggesting that the stock is 1.437% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Valeo SA has a beta of 1.507, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.714%.

Michelin has a quarterly dividend of $0.73 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.32%. Valeo SA offers a yield of 4.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. Michelin pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Valeo SA pays out 59.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Valeo SA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Michelin quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Valeo SA quarterly revenues of --. Michelin's net income of -- is lower than Valeo SA's net income of --. Notably, Michelin's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.98x while Valeo SA's PE ratio is 12.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Michelin is 0.83x versus 0.09x for Valeo SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.