IVFH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

The Chefs' Warehouse has a net margin of -0.2% compared to Innovative Food Holdings's net margin of 2.32%. Innovative Food Holdings's return on equity of 51.48% beat The Chefs' Warehouse's return on equity of 11.64%.

Innovative Food Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand The Chefs' Warehouse has an analysts' consensus of $69.00 which suggests that it could grow by 29.92%. Given that The Chefs' Warehouse has higher upside potential than Innovative Food Holdings, analysts believe The Chefs' Warehouse is more attractive than Innovative Food Holdings.

Innovative Food Holdings has a beta of 0.011, which suggesting that the stock is 98.896% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Chefs' Warehouse has a beta of 1.894, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 89.418%.

Innovative Food Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The Chefs' Warehouse offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Innovative Food Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The Chefs' Warehouse pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Innovative Food Holdings quarterly revenues are $22.7M, which are smaller than The Chefs' Warehouse quarterly revenues of $1B. Innovative Food Holdings's net income of -$45.9K is lower than The Chefs' Warehouse's net income of $23.9M. Notably, Innovative Food Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.94x while The Chefs' Warehouse's PE ratio is 40.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Innovative Food Holdings is 1.21x versus 0.62x for The Chefs' Warehouse. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Amcon Distributing has a net margin of -0.2% compared to Innovative Food Holdings's net margin of -0.26%. Innovative Food Holdings's return on equity of 51.48% beat Amcon Distributing's return on equity of 1.34%.

Innovative Food Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Amcon Distributing has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Innovative Food Holdings has higher upside potential than Amcon Distributing, analysts believe Innovative Food Holdings is more attractive than Amcon Distributing.

Innovative Food Holdings has a beta of 0.011, which suggesting that the stock is 98.896% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Amcon Distributing has a beta of 0.536, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.361%.

Innovative Food Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Amcon Distributing offers a yield of 0.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Innovative Food Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Amcon Distributing pays out 14.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Amcon Distributing's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Innovative Food Holdings quarterly revenues are $22.7M, which are smaller than Amcon Distributing quarterly revenues of $619.5M. Innovative Food Holdings's net income of -$45.9K is higher than Amcon Distributing's net income of -$1.6M. Notably, Innovative Food Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.94x while Amcon Distributing's PE ratio is 43.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Innovative Food Holdings is 1.21x versus 0.02x for Amcon Distributing. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SpartanNash has a net margin of -0.2% compared to Innovative Food Holdings's net margin of -1.55%. Innovative Food Holdings's return on equity of 51.48% beat SpartanNash's return on equity of 0.04%.

Innovative Food Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SpartanNash has an analysts' consensus of $20.50 which suggests that it could grow by 2.71%. Given that SpartanNash has higher upside potential than Innovative Food Holdings, analysts believe SpartanNash is more attractive than Innovative Food Holdings.

Innovative Food Holdings has a beta of 0.011, which suggesting that the stock is 98.896% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SpartanNash has a beta of 0.531, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.937%.

Innovative Food Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SpartanNash offers a yield of 4.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. Innovative Food Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SpartanNash pays out 10003.01% of its earnings as a dividend.

Innovative Food Holdings quarterly revenues are $22.7M, which are smaller than SpartanNash quarterly revenues of $2.3B. Innovative Food Holdings's net income of -$45.9K is higher than SpartanNash's net income of -$35.1M. Notably, Innovative Food Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.94x while SpartanNash's PE ratio is 15.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Innovative Food Holdings is 1.21x versus 0.07x for SpartanNash. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

United Natural Foods has a net margin of -0.2% compared to Innovative Food Holdings's net margin of -0.04%. Innovative Food Holdings's return on equity of 51.48% beat United Natural Foods's return on equity of -4.96%.

Innovative Food Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand United Natural Foods has an analysts' consensus of $30.00 which suggests that it could grow by 14.46%. Given that United Natural Foods has higher upside potential than Innovative Food Holdings, analysts believe United Natural Foods is more attractive than Innovative Food Holdings.

Innovative Food Holdings has a beta of 0.011, which suggesting that the stock is 98.896% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison United Natural Foods has a beta of 1.078, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.767%.

Innovative Food Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. United Natural Foods offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Innovative Food Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. United Natural Foods pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Innovative Food Holdings quarterly revenues are $22.7M, which are smaller than United Natural Foods quarterly revenues of $8.2B. Innovative Food Holdings's net income of -$45.9K is higher than United Natural Foods's net income of -$3M. Notably, Innovative Food Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.94x while United Natural Foods's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Innovative Food Holdings is 1.21x versus 0.05x for United Natural Foods. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.