HTHIY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Kubota has a net margin of 5.62% compared to Hitachi's net margin of 6.75%. Hitachi's return on equity of 11.45% beat Kubota's return on equity of 9.86%.

Hitachi has a consensus price target of $30.67, signalling upside risk potential of 24.31%. On the other hand Kubota has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 27.96%. Given that Kubota has higher upside potential than Hitachi, analysts believe Kubota is more attractive than Hitachi.

Hitachi has a beta of 0.758, which suggesting that the stock is 24.215% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kubota has a beta of 0.962, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.756%.

Hitachi has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.09%. Kubota offers a yield of 2.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Hitachi pays 24.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Kubota pays out 24.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hitachi quarterly revenues are $16.2B, which are larger than Kubota quarterly revenues of $4.7B. Hitachi's net income of $908.1M is higher than Kubota's net income of $317.2M. Notably, Hitachi's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.70x while Kubota's PE ratio is 8.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hitachi is 1.71x versus 0.75x for Kubota. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kyocera has a net margin of 5.62% compared to Hitachi's net margin of -3.6%. Hitachi's return on equity of 11.45% beat Kyocera's return on equity of 1.45%.

Hitachi has a consensus price target of $30.67, signalling upside risk potential of 24.31%. On the other hand Kyocera has an analysts' consensus of $11.40 which suggests that it could fall by -2.56%. Given that Hitachi has higher upside potential than Kyocera, analysts believe Hitachi is more attractive than Kyocera.

Hitachi has a beta of 0.758, which suggesting that the stock is 24.215% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kyocera has a beta of 0.241, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 75.921%.

Hitachi has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.09%. Kyocera offers a yield of 2.75% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Hitachi pays 24.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Kyocera pays out 73.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hitachi quarterly revenues are $16.2B, which are larger than Kyocera quarterly revenues of $3.2B. Hitachi's net income of $908.1M is higher than Kyocera's net income of -$116.4M. Notably, Hitachi's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.70x while Kyocera's PE ratio is 51.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hitachi is 1.71x versus 1.21x for Kyocera. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SBC Medical Group Holdings has a net margin of 5.62% compared to Hitachi's net margin of 5.34%. Hitachi's return on equity of 11.45% beat SBC Medical Group Holdings's return on equity of 25.89%.

Hitachi has a consensus price target of $30.67, signalling upside risk potential of 24.31%. On the other hand SBC Medical Group Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $10.00 which suggests that it could grow by 166.67%. Given that SBC Medical Group Holdings has higher upside potential than Hitachi, analysts believe SBC Medical Group Holdings is more attractive than Hitachi.

Hitachi has a beta of 0.758, which suggesting that the stock is 24.215% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SBC Medical Group Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Hitachi has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.09%. SBC Medical Group Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hitachi pays 24.47% of its earnings as a dividend. SBC Medical Group Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hitachi's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hitachi quarterly revenues are $16.2B, which are larger than SBC Medical Group Holdings quarterly revenues of $53.1M. Hitachi's net income of $908.1M is higher than SBC Medical Group Holdings's net income of $2.8M. Notably, Hitachi's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.70x while SBC Medical Group Holdings's PE ratio is 8.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hitachi is 1.71x versus 1.73x for SBC Medical Group Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SECOM has a net margin of 5.62% compared to Hitachi's net margin of 9.53%. Hitachi's return on equity of 11.45% beat SECOM's return on equity of 7.56%.

Hitachi has a consensus price target of $30.67, signalling upside risk potential of 24.31%. On the other hand SECOM has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Hitachi has higher upside potential than SECOM, analysts believe Hitachi is more attractive than SECOM.

Hitachi has a beta of 0.758, which suggesting that the stock is 24.215% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SECOM has a beta of 0.351, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 64.883%.

Hitachi has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.09%. SECOM offers a yield of 1.75% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Hitachi pays 24.47% of its earnings as a dividend. SECOM pays out 39.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hitachi quarterly revenues are $16.2B, which are larger than SECOM quarterly revenues of $2B. Hitachi's net income of $908.1M is higher than SECOM's net income of $190.3M. Notably, Hitachi's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.70x while SECOM's PE ratio is 20.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hitachi is 1.71x versus 2.74x for SECOM. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.