FXLV Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Life Time Group Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to F45 Training Holdings's net margin of 5.97%. F45 Training Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Life Time Group Holdings's return on equity of 6.1%.

F45 Training Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 4818.03%. On the other hand Life Time Group Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $28.54 which suggests that it could grow by 27.92%. Given that F45 Training Holdings has higher upside potential than Life Time Group Holdings, analysts believe F45 Training Holdings is more attractive than Life Time Group Holdings.

F45 Training Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Life Time Group Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

F45 Training Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Life Time Group Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. F45 Training Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Life Time Group Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

F45 Training Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Life Time Group Holdings quarterly revenues of $693.2M. F45 Training Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Life Time Group Holdings's net income of $41.4M. Notably, F45 Training Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Life Time Group Holdings's PE ratio is 32.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for F45 Training Holdings is 0.10x versus 1.83x for Life Time Group Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lucky Strike Entertainment has a net margin of -- compared to F45 Training Holdings's net margin of 8.88%. F45 Training Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Lucky Strike Entertainment's return on equity of -203.93%.

F45 Training Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 4818.03%. On the other hand Lucky Strike Entertainment has an analysts' consensus of $17.45 which suggests that it could grow by 67.95%. Given that F45 Training Holdings has higher upside potential than Lucky Strike Entertainment, analysts believe F45 Training Holdings is more attractive than Lucky Strike Entertainment.

F45 Training Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lucky Strike Entertainment has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

F45 Training Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lucky Strike Entertainment offers a yield of 2.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. F45 Training Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lucky Strike Entertainment pays out -29.86% of its earnings as a dividend.

F45 Training Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Lucky Strike Entertainment quarterly revenues of $260.2M. F45 Training Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Lucky Strike Entertainment's net income of $23.1M. Notably, F45 Training Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lucky Strike Entertainment's PE ratio is 19.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for F45 Training Holdings is 0.10x versus 1.33x for Lucky Strike Entertainment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Planet Fitness has a net margin of -- compared to F45 Training Holdings's net margin of 14.38%. F45 Training Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Planet Fitness's return on equity of --.

F45 Training Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 4818.03%. On the other hand Planet Fitness has an analysts' consensus of $105.46 which suggests that it could grow by 6.24%. Given that F45 Training Holdings has higher upside potential than Planet Fitness, analysts believe F45 Training Holdings is more attractive than Planet Fitness.

F45 Training Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Planet Fitness has a beta of 1.527, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.692%.

F45 Training Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Planet Fitness offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. F45 Training Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Planet Fitness pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

F45 Training Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Planet Fitness quarterly revenues of $292.2M. F45 Training Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Planet Fitness's net income of $42M. Notably, F45 Training Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Planet Fitness's PE ratio is 53.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for F45 Training Holdings is 0.10x versus 7.60x for Planet Fitness. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Xponential Fitness has a net margin of -- compared to F45 Training Holdings's net margin of -16.64%. F45 Training Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Xponential Fitness's return on equity of --.

F45 Training Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 4818.03%. On the other hand Xponential Fitness has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 38.19%. Given that F45 Training Holdings has higher upside potential than Xponential Fitness, analysts believe F45 Training Holdings is more attractive than Xponential Fitness.

F45 Training Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xponential Fitness has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

F45 Training Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Xponential Fitness offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. F45 Training Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Xponential Fitness pays out -40.58% of its earnings as a dividend.

F45 Training Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Xponential Fitness quarterly revenues of $80.5M. F45 Training Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Xponential Fitness's net income of -$13.4M. Notably, F45 Training Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Xponential Fitness's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for F45 Training Holdings is 0.10x versus 1.42x for Xponential Fitness. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.